Why does cost of the travel from zone 1 to zone 3 in London depend on means of transportation?










11















Wimbledon Station: zone 3



Waterloo Station: zone 1



The fastest way is to take a direct train that takes 16 minutes - Google Maps



The cheapest way is to take the Tube but it would take much longer.



https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/fares/single-fare-finder



enter image description here



I would assume that TFL (company operating Tube) and South West Trains are working together allowing commuters to use Oyster / contactless... So what is the rationale for different prices for the same distance covered?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

    – EdC
    May 5 '16 at 2:24















11















Wimbledon Station: zone 3



Waterloo Station: zone 1



The fastest way is to take a direct train that takes 16 minutes - Google Maps



The cheapest way is to take the Tube but it would take much longer.



https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/fares/single-fare-finder



enter image description here



I would assume that TFL (company operating Tube) and South West Trains are working together allowing commuters to use Oyster / contactless... So what is the rationale for different prices for the same distance covered?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

    – EdC
    May 5 '16 at 2:24













11












11








11


1






Wimbledon Station: zone 3



Waterloo Station: zone 1



The fastest way is to take a direct train that takes 16 minutes - Google Maps



The cheapest way is to take the Tube but it would take much longer.



https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/fares/single-fare-finder



enter image description here



I would assume that TFL (company operating Tube) and South West Trains are working together allowing commuters to use Oyster / contactless... So what is the rationale for different prices for the same distance covered?










share|improve this question
















Wimbledon Station: zone 3



Waterloo Station: zone 1



The fastest way is to take a direct train that takes 16 minutes - Google Maps



The cheapest way is to take the Tube but it would take much longer.



https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/fares/single-fare-finder



enter image description here



I would assume that TFL (company operating Tube) and South West Trains are working together allowing commuters to use Oyster / contactless... So what is the rationale for different prices for the same distance covered?







london london-underground national-rail oyster-card






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 4 '16 at 23:07







Michal Stefanow

















asked May 4 '16 at 22:01









Michal StefanowMichal Stefanow

7141713




7141713







  • 3





    You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

    – EdC
    May 5 '16 at 2:24












  • 3





    You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

    – EdC
    May 5 '16 at 2:24







3




3





You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

– EdC
May 5 '16 at 2:24





You're missing the Rail-only fare, which is £3.40 peak, but only £2.50 off peak (you have to search to London Waterloo, not Waterloo Underground to see that). In case it wasn't complicated enough already.

– EdC
May 5 '16 at 2:24










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















17














Your assumption that TfL and SWT are working together is wrong - at least so far as fare setting goes. And there are in fact four different fares available to you - although only the first two involve a reasonable journey; the two more expensive ones will be slower than at least one of the cheaper options.



State owned TfL in agreement with the Mayor sets fares for journeys that involve only the Underground, the Overground, or both. That's your £3.30 peak fare. There's a political incentive to keep fares relatively low, or you get voted out.



The privately owned train companies jointly (as ATOC) set the rail-only fares. These are also valid for journeys on rail + Overground, as historically the Overground was part of the rail. That's a £3.40 peak fare, but only £2.50 off peak. To see these prices, you'll have to search for a journey from Wimbledon to London Waterloo Rail Station. The train companies are limited in the fare rises they can make to certain fares, I believe including these ones.



To add to the confusion, the train only peak fare also applies in the evening; all the other fares only have a peak time in the morning.



The train companies and TfL both want their slice of the pie on the joint fare, which is the £5.00 one. This is for any journey involving both National Rail and Underground. The fare was really designed for those coming into the rail terminals on the train, then switching to the tube to head into the City (say). The rail companies don't want to accept significantly less from them them than someone leaving the system at Waterloo, and TfL don't want to accept significantly less than anyone else using the tube system (they also want to discourage you from using it for a short journey).



Your final option is the £4.80 one. This one's really two separate fares - a £2.40 Zone 2-3 rail fare, and a £2.40 Zone 1 tube fare - Elephant and Castle and Vauxhall are both on the Zone 1/2 boundary. They could charge you the £5.00 fare for this journey, but I guess they're being nice so they charge you the lower option.






share|improve this answer
































    4














    Aw, that's one of my old commutes (although I lived in Southfields, so pretty much had to take the tube).



    Without sitting in their pricing meetings, I'd suggest it's supply and demand.



    As you said, the tube takes longer, but is cheaper. People are prepared to pay more for timeliness / shorter journeys.



    In addition, there may be more people on one than the other, and people may be prepared to pay more for more comfort. Similarly, by raising prices you can spread load as people look for the cheaper options.



    Finally, it may cost a lot more to run one than the other, depending on maintenance, fuel and service costs. To offset this and keep it running, they may be required to charge more for it.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      So to add further confusion to the mix, I think it massively depends on the ATOC.



      For GWR services, if you travel from a NR station say Drayton Green (Zone 4) to Paddington NR (Zone 1) the cost is £3.90 peak and £2.80 off-peak.
      However if you then interchange onto the tube at Paddington and continuing to somewhere inside zone 1 like Oxford Circus the price is exactly the same.



      Doing the same on SWR services, from a NR station, say St. Margarets (Zone 4) to Waterloo NR (Zone 1) the cost is £4.10 peak & £3.00 off-peak, almost the same price.
      Interchanging onto the tube at Waterloo and continuing to Oxford Circus would mean the total journey price is £5.80 peak & £4.50 off-peak, around 50% for the same number of zones!



      So much for travelling by zones being equal pricing, no wonder TfL got rid of the fare PDF chart from their website as all these nuances are now hidden!






      share|improve this answer























      • Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

        – Michal Stefanow
        Nov 26 '18 at 4:00












      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "273"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67741%2fwhy-does-cost-of-the-travel-from-zone-1-to-zone-3-in-london-depend-on-means-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      17














      Your assumption that TfL and SWT are working together is wrong - at least so far as fare setting goes. And there are in fact four different fares available to you - although only the first two involve a reasonable journey; the two more expensive ones will be slower than at least one of the cheaper options.



      State owned TfL in agreement with the Mayor sets fares for journeys that involve only the Underground, the Overground, or both. That's your £3.30 peak fare. There's a political incentive to keep fares relatively low, or you get voted out.



      The privately owned train companies jointly (as ATOC) set the rail-only fares. These are also valid for journeys on rail + Overground, as historically the Overground was part of the rail. That's a £3.40 peak fare, but only £2.50 off peak. To see these prices, you'll have to search for a journey from Wimbledon to London Waterloo Rail Station. The train companies are limited in the fare rises they can make to certain fares, I believe including these ones.



      To add to the confusion, the train only peak fare also applies in the evening; all the other fares only have a peak time in the morning.



      The train companies and TfL both want their slice of the pie on the joint fare, which is the £5.00 one. This is for any journey involving both National Rail and Underground. The fare was really designed for those coming into the rail terminals on the train, then switching to the tube to head into the City (say). The rail companies don't want to accept significantly less from them them than someone leaving the system at Waterloo, and TfL don't want to accept significantly less than anyone else using the tube system (they also want to discourage you from using it for a short journey).



      Your final option is the £4.80 one. This one's really two separate fares - a £2.40 Zone 2-3 rail fare, and a £2.40 Zone 1 tube fare - Elephant and Castle and Vauxhall are both on the Zone 1/2 boundary. They could charge you the £5.00 fare for this journey, but I guess they're being nice so they charge you the lower option.






      share|improve this answer





























        17














        Your assumption that TfL and SWT are working together is wrong - at least so far as fare setting goes. And there are in fact four different fares available to you - although only the first two involve a reasonable journey; the two more expensive ones will be slower than at least one of the cheaper options.



        State owned TfL in agreement with the Mayor sets fares for journeys that involve only the Underground, the Overground, or both. That's your £3.30 peak fare. There's a political incentive to keep fares relatively low, or you get voted out.



        The privately owned train companies jointly (as ATOC) set the rail-only fares. These are also valid for journeys on rail + Overground, as historically the Overground was part of the rail. That's a £3.40 peak fare, but only £2.50 off peak. To see these prices, you'll have to search for a journey from Wimbledon to London Waterloo Rail Station. The train companies are limited in the fare rises they can make to certain fares, I believe including these ones.



        To add to the confusion, the train only peak fare also applies in the evening; all the other fares only have a peak time in the morning.



        The train companies and TfL both want their slice of the pie on the joint fare, which is the £5.00 one. This is for any journey involving both National Rail and Underground. The fare was really designed for those coming into the rail terminals on the train, then switching to the tube to head into the City (say). The rail companies don't want to accept significantly less from them them than someone leaving the system at Waterloo, and TfL don't want to accept significantly less than anyone else using the tube system (they also want to discourage you from using it for a short journey).



        Your final option is the £4.80 one. This one's really two separate fares - a £2.40 Zone 2-3 rail fare, and a £2.40 Zone 1 tube fare - Elephant and Castle and Vauxhall are both on the Zone 1/2 boundary. They could charge you the £5.00 fare for this journey, but I guess they're being nice so they charge you the lower option.






        share|improve this answer



























          17












          17








          17







          Your assumption that TfL and SWT are working together is wrong - at least so far as fare setting goes. And there are in fact four different fares available to you - although only the first two involve a reasonable journey; the two more expensive ones will be slower than at least one of the cheaper options.



          State owned TfL in agreement with the Mayor sets fares for journeys that involve only the Underground, the Overground, or both. That's your £3.30 peak fare. There's a political incentive to keep fares relatively low, or you get voted out.



          The privately owned train companies jointly (as ATOC) set the rail-only fares. These are also valid for journeys on rail + Overground, as historically the Overground was part of the rail. That's a £3.40 peak fare, but only £2.50 off peak. To see these prices, you'll have to search for a journey from Wimbledon to London Waterloo Rail Station. The train companies are limited in the fare rises they can make to certain fares, I believe including these ones.



          To add to the confusion, the train only peak fare also applies in the evening; all the other fares only have a peak time in the morning.



          The train companies and TfL both want their slice of the pie on the joint fare, which is the £5.00 one. This is for any journey involving both National Rail and Underground. The fare was really designed for those coming into the rail terminals on the train, then switching to the tube to head into the City (say). The rail companies don't want to accept significantly less from them them than someone leaving the system at Waterloo, and TfL don't want to accept significantly less than anyone else using the tube system (they also want to discourage you from using it for a short journey).



          Your final option is the £4.80 one. This one's really two separate fares - a £2.40 Zone 2-3 rail fare, and a £2.40 Zone 1 tube fare - Elephant and Castle and Vauxhall are both on the Zone 1/2 boundary. They could charge you the £5.00 fare for this journey, but I guess they're being nice so they charge you the lower option.






          share|improve this answer















          Your assumption that TfL and SWT are working together is wrong - at least so far as fare setting goes. And there are in fact four different fares available to you - although only the first two involve a reasonable journey; the two more expensive ones will be slower than at least one of the cheaper options.



          State owned TfL in agreement with the Mayor sets fares for journeys that involve only the Underground, the Overground, or both. That's your £3.30 peak fare. There's a political incentive to keep fares relatively low, or you get voted out.



          The privately owned train companies jointly (as ATOC) set the rail-only fares. These are also valid for journeys on rail + Overground, as historically the Overground was part of the rail. That's a £3.40 peak fare, but only £2.50 off peak. To see these prices, you'll have to search for a journey from Wimbledon to London Waterloo Rail Station. The train companies are limited in the fare rises they can make to certain fares, I believe including these ones.



          To add to the confusion, the train only peak fare also applies in the evening; all the other fares only have a peak time in the morning.



          The train companies and TfL both want their slice of the pie on the joint fare, which is the £5.00 one. This is for any journey involving both National Rail and Underground. The fare was really designed for those coming into the rail terminals on the train, then switching to the tube to head into the City (say). The rail companies don't want to accept significantly less from them them than someone leaving the system at Waterloo, and TfL don't want to accept significantly less than anyone else using the tube system (they also want to discourage you from using it for a short journey).



          Your final option is the £4.80 one. This one's really two separate fares - a £2.40 Zone 2-3 rail fare, and a £2.40 Zone 1 tube fare - Elephant and Castle and Vauxhall are both on the Zone 1/2 boundary. They could charge you the £5.00 fare for this journey, but I guess they're being nice so they charge you the lower option.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 6 '16 at 10:48

























          answered May 5 '16 at 3:18









          EdCEdC

          2,058618




          2,058618























              4














              Aw, that's one of my old commutes (although I lived in Southfields, so pretty much had to take the tube).



              Without sitting in their pricing meetings, I'd suggest it's supply and demand.



              As you said, the tube takes longer, but is cheaper. People are prepared to pay more for timeliness / shorter journeys.



              In addition, there may be more people on one than the other, and people may be prepared to pay more for more comfort. Similarly, by raising prices you can spread load as people look for the cheaper options.



              Finally, it may cost a lot more to run one than the other, depending on maintenance, fuel and service costs. To offset this and keep it running, they may be required to charge more for it.






              share|improve this answer



























                4














                Aw, that's one of my old commutes (although I lived in Southfields, so pretty much had to take the tube).



                Without sitting in their pricing meetings, I'd suggest it's supply and demand.



                As you said, the tube takes longer, but is cheaper. People are prepared to pay more for timeliness / shorter journeys.



                In addition, there may be more people on one than the other, and people may be prepared to pay more for more comfort. Similarly, by raising prices you can spread load as people look for the cheaper options.



                Finally, it may cost a lot more to run one than the other, depending on maintenance, fuel and service costs. To offset this and keep it running, they may be required to charge more for it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Aw, that's one of my old commutes (although I lived in Southfields, so pretty much had to take the tube).



                  Without sitting in their pricing meetings, I'd suggest it's supply and demand.



                  As you said, the tube takes longer, but is cheaper. People are prepared to pay more for timeliness / shorter journeys.



                  In addition, there may be more people on one than the other, and people may be prepared to pay more for more comfort. Similarly, by raising prices you can spread load as people look for the cheaper options.



                  Finally, it may cost a lot more to run one than the other, depending on maintenance, fuel and service costs. To offset this and keep it running, they may be required to charge more for it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Aw, that's one of my old commutes (although I lived in Southfields, so pretty much had to take the tube).



                  Without sitting in their pricing meetings, I'd suggest it's supply and demand.



                  As you said, the tube takes longer, but is cheaper. People are prepared to pay more for timeliness / shorter journeys.



                  In addition, there may be more people on one than the other, and people may be prepared to pay more for more comfort. Similarly, by raising prices you can spread load as people look for the cheaper options.



                  Finally, it may cost a lot more to run one than the other, depending on maintenance, fuel and service costs. To offset this and keep it running, they may be required to charge more for it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 4 '16 at 23:41









                  Mark MayoMark Mayo

                  130k785781295




                  130k785781295





















                      1














                      So to add further confusion to the mix, I think it massively depends on the ATOC.



                      For GWR services, if you travel from a NR station say Drayton Green (Zone 4) to Paddington NR (Zone 1) the cost is £3.90 peak and £2.80 off-peak.
                      However if you then interchange onto the tube at Paddington and continuing to somewhere inside zone 1 like Oxford Circus the price is exactly the same.



                      Doing the same on SWR services, from a NR station, say St. Margarets (Zone 4) to Waterloo NR (Zone 1) the cost is £4.10 peak & £3.00 off-peak, almost the same price.
                      Interchanging onto the tube at Waterloo and continuing to Oxford Circus would mean the total journey price is £5.80 peak & £4.50 off-peak, around 50% for the same number of zones!



                      So much for travelling by zones being equal pricing, no wonder TfL got rid of the fare PDF chart from their website as all these nuances are now hidden!






                      share|improve this answer























                      • Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                        – Michal Stefanow
                        Nov 26 '18 at 4:00
















                      1














                      So to add further confusion to the mix, I think it massively depends on the ATOC.



                      For GWR services, if you travel from a NR station say Drayton Green (Zone 4) to Paddington NR (Zone 1) the cost is £3.90 peak and £2.80 off-peak.
                      However if you then interchange onto the tube at Paddington and continuing to somewhere inside zone 1 like Oxford Circus the price is exactly the same.



                      Doing the same on SWR services, from a NR station, say St. Margarets (Zone 4) to Waterloo NR (Zone 1) the cost is £4.10 peak & £3.00 off-peak, almost the same price.
                      Interchanging onto the tube at Waterloo and continuing to Oxford Circus would mean the total journey price is £5.80 peak & £4.50 off-peak, around 50% for the same number of zones!



                      So much for travelling by zones being equal pricing, no wonder TfL got rid of the fare PDF chart from their website as all these nuances are now hidden!






                      share|improve this answer























                      • Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                        – Michal Stefanow
                        Nov 26 '18 at 4:00














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      So to add further confusion to the mix, I think it massively depends on the ATOC.



                      For GWR services, if you travel from a NR station say Drayton Green (Zone 4) to Paddington NR (Zone 1) the cost is £3.90 peak and £2.80 off-peak.
                      However if you then interchange onto the tube at Paddington and continuing to somewhere inside zone 1 like Oxford Circus the price is exactly the same.



                      Doing the same on SWR services, from a NR station, say St. Margarets (Zone 4) to Waterloo NR (Zone 1) the cost is £4.10 peak & £3.00 off-peak, almost the same price.
                      Interchanging onto the tube at Waterloo and continuing to Oxford Circus would mean the total journey price is £5.80 peak & £4.50 off-peak, around 50% for the same number of zones!



                      So much for travelling by zones being equal pricing, no wonder TfL got rid of the fare PDF chart from their website as all these nuances are now hidden!






                      share|improve this answer













                      So to add further confusion to the mix, I think it massively depends on the ATOC.



                      For GWR services, if you travel from a NR station say Drayton Green (Zone 4) to Paddington NR (Zone 1) the cost is £3.90 peak and £2.80 off-peak.
                      However if you then interchange onto the tube at Paddington and continuing to somewhere inside zone 1 like Oxford Circus the price is exactly the same.



                      Doing the same on SWR services, from a NR station, say St. Margarets (Zone 4) to Waterloo NR (Zone 1) the cost is £4.10 peak & £3.00 off-peak, almost the same price.
                      Interchanging onto the tube at Waterloo and continuing to Oxford Circus would mean the total journey price is £5.80 peak & £4.50 off-peak, around 50% for the same number of zones!



                      So much for travelling by zones being equal pricing, no wonder TfL got rid of the fare PDF chart from their website as all these nuances are now hidden!







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Nov 24 '18 at 10:33









                      Robin MarksRobin Marks

                      111




                      111












                      • Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                        – Michal Stefanow
                        Nov 26 '18 at 4:00


















                      • Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                        – Michal Stefanow
                        Nov 26 '18 at 4:00

















                      Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                      – Michal Stefanow
                      Nov 26 '18 at 4:00






                      Such an example, many WOW, double checked the facts: twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1066904297378467841

                      – Michal Stefanow
                      Nov 26 '18 at 4:00


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67741%2fwhy-does-cost-of-the-travel-from-zone-1-to-zone-3-in-london-depend-on-means-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                      Crossroads (UK TV series)

                      ữḛḳṊẴ ẋ,Ẩṙ,ỹḛẪẠứụỿṞṦ,Ṉẍừ,ứ Ị,Ḵ,ṏ ṇỪḎḰṰọửḊ ṾḨḮữẑỶṑỗḮṣṉẃ Ữẩụ,ṓ,ḹẕḪḫỞṿḭ ỒṱṨẁṋṜ ḅẈ ṉ ứṀḱṑỒḵ,ḏ,ḊḖỹẊ Ẻḷổ,ṥ ẔḲẪụḣể Ṱ ḭỏựẶ Ồ Ṩ,ẂḿṡḾồ ỗṗṡịṞẤḵṽẃ ṸḒẄẘ,ủẞẵṦṟầṓế