Catholic theology of sexuality
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
Part of a series on the |
Catholic Church |
---|
St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City |
Overview |
|
Background
|
Organisation
|
Theology
|
Philosophy
|
Worship
|
Rites
|
Controversies
|
Other topics
Relations with:
|
Links and resources
|
Catholicism portal |
Catholic theology of sexuality, like Catholic theology in general, is drawn from natural law, canonical scripture, divine revelation, and sacred tradition, as interpreted authoritatively by the magisterium of the Catholic Church.[1][2]Sexual morality evaluates sexual behavior according to standards laid out by Catholic moral theology, and often provides general principles by which Catholics are able to evaluate whether specific actions meet these standards. Much of the Church's detailed doctrines derive from the principle that "sexual pleasure is morally disordered when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive [between spouses] purposes".[3] At the same time, the Bishops at Vatican II decreed that the essential procreative end of marriage does not make "the other purposes of matrimony of less account."[4]
The Catholic Church teaches that human life and human sexuality are inseparable.[5] Because Catholics believe God created human beings in his own image and likeness and that he found everything he created to be "very good,"[6] the Catholic Church teaches that human body and sex must likewise be good. The Church considers the expression of love between husband and wife to be an elevated form of human activity, joining husband and wife in complete, mutual self-giving, and opening their relationship to new life. As Pope Paul VI wrote in Humanae vitae, “The sexual activity, in which husband and wife are intimately and chastely united with one another, through which human life is transmitted, is, as the recent Council recalled, ‘noble and worthy.’”[7] In cases in which sexual expression is sought outside sacramental marriage, or in which the procreative function of sexual expression within marriage is deliberately frustrated (e.g., the use of artificial contraception), the Catholic Church expresses grave moral concern.
The Church teaches that sexual intercourse has a purpose; and that outside marriage it is contrary to its purpose. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "conjugal love ... aims at a deeply personal unity, a unity that, beyond union in one flesh, leads to forming one heart and soul",[8] since the marriage bond is to be a sign of the love between God and humanity.[9]
Among what are considered sins gravely contrary to chastity are masturbation, fornication, pornography, homosexual practices,[10] and artificial contraception.[11] Procurement of abortion, in addition to being considered grave matter, carries, under the conditions envisaged by canon law, the penalty of excommunication, "by the very commission of the offense".[12]
Contents
1 Basis
1.1 Natural law
1.2 Scripture
1.3 Patristic theology
1.4 Medieval theology
1.5 Early modern theology
1.6 Magisterium since 1930
1.7 Dissent
2 Teachings on specific subjects
2.1 Adultery
2.2 Chastity
2.3 Contraception
2.3.1 Medical use
2.4 Fornication
2.5 Homosexuality
2.6 Lust
2.7 Masturbation
2.8 Pornography
2.9 Prostitution
2.10 Rape
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
Basis
Natural law
Natural law (Latin: lex naturalis) is an ethical theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by nature and that therefore has validity everywhere.[13] Despite pagan associations with natural law theory, a number (though not all) of the early Church Fathers sought to incorporate it into Christian theology.[citation needed]
In an influential passage of the Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas wrote:
the rational creature is subject to Divine providence in the most
excellent way, in so far as it partakes of a share of providence,
by being provident both for itself and for others. Wherefore it has
a share of the Eternal Reason, whereby it has a natural inclination
to its proper act and end: and this participation of the eternal law
in the rational creature is called the natural law.[14]
Natural law is a basic source for Catholic theology of sexuality.[citation needed]
Scripture
The Genesis creation narratives provide insights into anthropology that inform Catholic theology of sexuality. The following verses are frequently cited in Catholic studies of sexual morality:
- 1:27: "And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them."[15]
- 2:21–25: "Then the Lord God cast a deep sleep upon Adam: and when he was fast asleep, he took one of his ribs, and filled up flesh for it. And the Lord God built the rib which he took from Adam into a woman: and brought her to Adam. And Adam said: This now is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man. Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh. And they were both naked: to wit, Adam and his wife: and were not ashamed."[16]
- 3:16: "To the woman also he said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thou shalt be under thy husband's power, and he shall have dominion over thee."[17]
Two of the Ten Commandments directly address sexual morality, forbidding adultery[18][19] and covetousness of the wife of one's neighbor.[20][21]
Jesus comments on these commandments in the Gospel of Matthew:
You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not commit adultery. But I say to you, that whosoever shall look on a woman to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.[22]
Jesus also makes reference to the passages from Genesis in his teachings on marriage in Matthew:
Have ye not read, that he who made man from the beginning, Made them male and female? And he said: For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they two shall be in one flesh. Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder. They [the Pharisees] say to him: Why then did Moses command to give a bill of divorce, and to put away? He [Jesus] saith to them: Because Moses by reason of the hardness of your heart permitted you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.[23]
Patristic theology
Augustine of Hippo, considered a saint and church father by the Catholic Church, having lived a hedonistic lifestyle in his early youth, later followed the strictly dualistic religion of Manicheanism, which was deeply hostile to the material world, despising sexual activity. Eventually, under the influence of his Catholic Christian mother Monica, Augustine converted to Christianity, and later wrote movingly of this conversion in his Confessions, including details of the sexually-related aspects. The following passage from his autobiography describes a critical turning point in his change of sexual morality:
So quickly I returned to the place where Alypius was sitting; for there had I put down the volume of the apostles, when I rose thence. I grasped, opened, and in silence read that paragraph on which my eyes first fell: "Not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying; but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof." [Romans 13:13-14] No further would I read, nor did I need...[24]
Medieval theology
Thomas Aquinas dealt with sexual morality as an aspect of the virtue of temperance, and incorporates Scripture throughout his account. In his Summa Theologiae he writes about chastity:
The word "chastity" is employed in two ways. First, properly; and thus it is a special virtue having a special matter, namely the concupiscences relating to venereal pleasures. Secondly, the word "chastity" is employed metaphorically: for just as a mingling of bodies conduces to venereal pleasure which is the proper matter of chastity and of lust its contrary vice, so too the spiritual union of the mind with certain things conduces to a pleasure which is the matter of a spiritual chastity metaphorically speaking, as well as of a spiritual fornication likewise metaphorically so called. For if the human mind delight in the spiritual union with that to which it behooves it to be united, namely God, and refrains from delighting in union with other things against the requirements of the order established by God, this may be called a spiritual chastity, according to 2 Cor. 11:2, "I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ." If, on the other hand, the mind be united to any other things whatsoever, against the prescription of the Divine order, it will be called spiritual fornication, according to Jer. 3:1, "But thou hast prostituted thyself to many lovers." Taking chastity in this sense, it is a general virtue, because every virtue withdraws the human mind from delighting in a union with unlawful things. Nevertheless, the essence of this chastity consists principally in charity and the other theological virtues, whereby the human mind is united to God.[25]
In her Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven, Uta Ranke-Heinemann says that three discussions of marriage in the New Testament (Matthew 19, I Corinthians 7, and Ephesians 5:22-32) do not refer to generating children, which later became consistently emphasized in Catholic moral doctrine as the primary purpose of sexual relations, although, according to her, those texts does not indicate that conceiving children is excluded in marriage.[26]:43 The view that marriage is primarily intended for the purpose of procreation dominated early Christianity,[27] and held by many Church Fathers.[28][29] During the entire Middle Ages, the question of when intercourse was allowed and when it was not, was very important. Intercourse was prohibited on all Sundays and all the many feast days, as well as the 20 days before Christmas, the 40 days before Easter, and often the 20 days before Pentecost, as well as three or more days before receiving Communion (which at that time was offered only a few times a year). These forbidden days altogether totaled about 40% of each year.[26]:138 Some church leaders warned believers that children conceived on holy days would be born leprous, epileptic, diabolically possessed, or crippled. Penalties of 20 to 40 days of strict fasting on bread and water were imposed on transgressors.[26]:139–140 Intercourse was forbidden during the menstrual period and after childbirth, since "physicians mistakenly believed that the blood of a menstruating woman or one who has just given birth was poisonous".[26]:138 It was also forbidden during pregnancy, with concern for protecting the fetus as the main reason.[26]:151–152 "Christian theologians", including Pope Gregory I, held that abstinence should continue until a baby was weaned.[26]:143
Scholastic theologians from the 11th to 13th centuries shifted the time scheme to motives; the desire to procreate with "joy in a new servant of God" was considered the best motive for intercourse.[26]:143Bertold of Regensburg considered a woman innocent if she was forced to do it on the prohibited times by her husband and she did not will it.[26]:144 Because intercourse was only allowed for procreative reasons, various penitentials (rule books) also forbade intercourse between sterile or older partners, although never assigning a penalty.[26]:151 Heinemann says that oral and anal intercourse were often punished by more years of penance than for premeditated murder, as they prevented conception from occurring.[26]:149 Although practice varied, menstruating women were often forbidden to attend Mass or receive Communion, in which the Latin Church took a more moderate stance than the Eastern Churches.[26]:24 Since the blood from childbirth was believed more harmful than menstrual blood, the Synod of Trier (1227) ruled that women who had just given birth had to be "reconciled with the Church" before they allowed to enter church. They often could not buried in the cemetery if they died in childbirth before had undergone a purifying ritual, a policy which was rejected by several synods.[26]:25 The Council of Trent (1566), and several synods after that, did not impose abstinence from intercourse on certain times as an "obligation", but as an "admonition".[26]:145
Early modern theology
In the Counter-Reformation and early modern periods, theologians continued to write on issues relating to sexual morality and marriage, one example being Giovanni Maria Chiericato (Joannes Clericati) in his Decisiones de Matrimonio.[citation needed]
Magisterium since 1930
Casti connubii (1930) by Pope Pius XI
Casti connubii was written in part as a response to the decision of the Anglican Lambeth Conference in 1930 that taught the legitimacy of the use of contraception in some circumstances.- "Any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin."
Humanae vitae (1968) by Pope Paul VI
Persona humana (1975) by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Theology of the Body by Pope John Paul II
Evangelium vitae (1995) by Pope John Paul II- Donum Vitae (1987) by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Veritatis splendor (1993) by Pope John Paul II
Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)
Deus caritas est (2005)[citation needed]
Dissent
A study published in 1977,[30] titled Human Sexuality: New Directions in American Catholic Thought, after being commissioned in 1972 by the Catholic Theological Society of America (CTSA), which however did not approve the study, showed that dissent from the Holy See's teachings on sexuality was common among United States theologians. Reaction to the study showed that the dissent was not unanimous and brought about controversies inside the CTSA itself.[31][32]:73 In 1979, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith publicised an advisory that deplored the books's "erroneous conclusions", identified "numerous misreadings of the teaching of the Second Vatican Council" in it, and said that the book diminished "the morality of sexual love to a matter of 'personal sentiments, feelings, [and] customs ... .'"[32]:74[33]George Weigel restates that "these theological errors led to practical guidelines that 'either dissociate themselves from or directly contradict Catholic teaching' as taught by the Church's highest teaching authority."[32]:74
Teachings on specific subjects
Adultery
One of the ten commandments states: "Do not commit adultery".[34]
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that two partners commit adultery when they have sexual relations, even transient ones, while at least one of them is married to another party. There, adultery is defined as an injustice because it is an injury of the covenant of the marriage bond, a transgression of the other spouse, an undermining of the institution of marriage and a compromising of the welfare of children who need their parents' stable union.[35]
Chastity
The Catholic Church defines chastity as the virtue that moderates the sexual appetite.[36][37] Unmarried Catholics express chastity through sexual abstinence. Sexual intercourse within marriage is considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of union and procreation.[38]Pope John Paul II wrote:
At the center of the spirituality of marriage, therefore, there lies chastity not only as a moral virtue (formed by love), but likewise as a virtue connected with the gifts of the Holy Spirit—above all, the gift of respect for what comes from God (donum pietatis). This gift is in the mind of the author of the Ephesians when he exhorts married couples to "defer to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph 5:21). So the interior order of married life, which enables the manifestations of affection to develop according to their right proportion and meaning, is a fruit not only of the virtue which the couple practice, but also of the gifts of the Holy Spirit with which they cooperate.[39]
Because sex is considered chaste only within context of marriage, it has come to be called the "nuptial act" in Catholic discourse. Among Catholics, the nuptial act is considered to be the conjoining of a man and a woman through sexual intercourse, considered an act of love between two married persons, and is considered in this way, a gift from God. When discussing chastity, the Catechism lists several transgressions and sins against it.[40]
Contraception
The Church has been opposed to contraception for as far back as one can historically trace.[41][42] Many early Catholic Church Fathers made statements condemning the use of contraception including John Chrysostom, Jerome, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus of Rome, Augustine of Hippo and various others.[43][44][45] Among the condemnations is one by Jerome which refers to an apparent oral form of contraception: "Some go so far as to take potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human beings almost before their conception."[46]
The Catechism specifies that all sex acts must be both unitive and procreative.[47] In addition to condemning use of artificial birth control as intrinsically evil,[11] non-procreative sex acts such as mutual masturbation and anal sex are ruled out as ways to avoid pregnancy.[48]
Pope Paul VI, rejecting the majority report of the 1963–66 Pontifical Commission on Birth Control, confirmed the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on contraception, defined as "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible",[49] declaring it evil, and excluded. Prohibited acts with contraceptive effect include sterilization, condoms and other barrier methods, spermicides, coitus interruptus (withdrawal method), the Pill, and all other such methods.[50]
Restricting sexual activity to times when conception is unlikely (the "rhythm method" and similar practices) is not deemed sinful,[51] but only when it is practiced for "just reasons" and not "motivated by selfishness".[52]
John Paul II said in Familiaris consortio,
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality.... the difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality.[53]
In January 2015, during his return flight from a visit to the Philippines, Pope Francis was asked by a German journalist for his thoughts on the findings of some polls that most Filipinos think the population growth in the country, with each woman having on average three children, is one of the chief reasons for its poverty, and that many there disagree with Catholic teaching on contraception. He replied that the key is "responsible parenthood":
Some people think that—excuse my expression here—that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No. Responsible parenthood. This is clear and that is why in the Church there are marriage groups, there are experts in this matter, there are pastors, one can search; and I know so many ways that are licit and that have helped this.[54]
He also said that Pope Paul VI's teaching was prophetic, in view of the drop of the birth rate in some countries to little more than one child per woman.[55]
Medical use
The Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result therefrom, so long as the contraceptive effect is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever.[56] For example, the use of hormonal contraception as treatment for endometriosis rather than with contraceptive intent is not considered to conflict in any way with Catholic teaching.[57]
The use of condoms to prevent disease is a more controversial and more complex issue, with theologians arguing both sides.[58][59][60] Unlike drugs and surgical procedures, the Church's position as of 2013[update] was that using condoms during sex, for any purpose, is morally contraceptive and thus a sin.[citation needed]
Issues surrounding the Catholic Church and AIDS became highly controversial since 1990, primarily because many prominent Catholic leaders publicly declared their opposition to the use of condoms as a disease preventative. Other issues involve religious participation in global health care services and collaboration with secular organizations such as UNAIDS and the World Health Organization.[citation needed]
In November 2010 Pope Benedict said that it was a responsible act, though still not a truly moral solution, to use condoms in some very special cases as a device for the prevention of disease. He gave male prostitutes as an example, where the purpose is to "reduce the risk of infection" from HIV.[61] While still believing that contraceptive devices interfere with the creation of life, the Pope stated that in that particular case, it can be a responsible act to raise awareness of the nature of such an act, and as a benefit, to avoid death and save life, though only as a first step, not a truly moral solution, before convincing the male prostitute of a truly moral solution, which means ceasing prostitution and sexual activity outside of marriage. There was some confusion at first whether the statement applied only to homosexual prostitutes and thus not to heterosexual intercourse at all. However, Federico Lombardi, spokesman of the Vatican, clarified that it applied to heterosexual and transsexual prostitutes, both male and female, as well.[62] He also clarified that, in the interview, the Pope did not reverse the Church's centuries-old prohibition on contraceptive use in the context of heterosexual sexual acts, which the Church states must normally be open to the transmission of life,[61] and that he did not reverse his positions on homosexual acts and prostitution either.[citation needed]
Fornication
The Catholic Church disapproves of fornication (sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other), calling it "gravely contrary to the dignity of persons and of human sexuality".[63]
Homosexuality
The Catechism devotes a separate section to homosexuality within its explanation of the sixth commandment. The Church distinguishes between "homosexual attractions", which are not considered sinful, and "homosexual acts", which are considered sinful. Like all heterosexual acts outside of marriage, homosexual acts are considered sins against this commandment. The Catechism states that they "violate natural law, cannot bring forth life, and do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved."[64][65][66] The Church teaches that a homosexual inclination is "objectively disordered" and can be a great trial for the person for whom the Church teaches must be "accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity ... unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided."[64][67][66]
The homosexual person is, according to the Church, "called to chastity". They are instructed to practice the virtues of "self-mastery" that teaches "inner freedom" using the support of friends, prayer and grace found in the sacraments of the Church.[64] These tools are meant to help the homosexually inclined person to "gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection", which is a state to which all Christians are called.[64]
On 26 August 2018, Pope Francis said in Ireland, that homosexual people exist in whole history of human mankind. He teaches catholic parents to talk with their homosexual children and that they are part of their families and shouldn't "thrown out" of family. [68] On 27 August 2018 Pope Francis press statement declares, that homosexuality is not an illness.[69][70][71]
Lust
The Catholic Church disapproves of lust: "Sexual pleasure is morally disordered when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes".[3]
.mw-parser-output .templatequoteoverflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequoteciteline-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0
But I say to you, everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.[Matthew 5:28]
Masturbation
The Catholic Church disapproves of masturbation.[72]Thomas Aquinas, one of the most prominent Doctors of the Catholic Church, wrote that masturbation was an "unnatural vice" which is a species of lust", but that it is a less serious form than bestiality, which is "the most serious", and than sodomy, which is the next most serious:[73] "By procuring pollution [i.e., ejaculation apart from intercourse], without any copulation, for the sake of venereal pleasure [...] pertains to the sin of 'uncleanness' which some call 'effeminacy' [Latin: mollitiem, lit. 'softness, unmanliness']."[74]
More recently, from the Youcat:
409 Masturbation is an offense against love, because it makes the excitement of sexual pleasure an end in itself and uncouples it from the holistic unfolding of love between a man and a woman. That is why “sex with yourself” is a contradiction in terms.
The Church does not demonize masturbation, but she warns against trivializing it. In fact many young people and adults are in danger of becoming isolated in their consumption of lewd pictures, films, and Internet services instead of finding love in a personal relationship. Loneliness can lead to a blind alley in which masturbation becomes an addiction. Living by the motto "For sex I do not need anyone; I will have it myself, however and whenever I need it" makes nobody happy.[75]
According to Catholic Church teaching, "to form an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, one must take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that lessen or even extenuate moral culpability."[72]
Pornography
The Catholic Church disapproves of pornography and says that civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.[76]
Prostitution
The Catholic Church condemns prostitution as a societal vice.[77]
Rape
The Catholic Church condemns rape as "always an intrinsically evil act."[78]
See also
- Women in the Catholic Church
References
^ "CCC, 74–95". Vatican.va..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output .citation qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-maintdisplay:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em
^ "CCC, 1953–1955". Vatican.va.
^ ab "CCC, 2351". Vatican.va.
^ "Gaudium et spes". www.vatican.va. 50. Retrieved 2017-12-29.
^ "CCC, 2331-2400". Vatican.va.
^ Genesis 1:31
^ Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "CCC, 1643". Vatican.va.
^ "CCC, 1617". Vatican.va.
^ "CCC, 2351-2357". Vatican.va.
^ ab "CCC, 2370". Vatican.va.
^ "CCC, 2272". Vatican.va.
^ "Natural Law," International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
^ "Summa Theologica: text - IntraText CT". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ Genesis 1:27
^ Genesis 2:21–25
^ Genesis 3:16
^ Exodus 20:14
^ Deuteronomy 5:18
^ Exodus 20:17
^ Deuteronomy 5:21
^ Matthew 5:27-28
^ Matthew 19:4-8
^ St. Augustine, Confessions, Book 8, Chapter 12
^ St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II-II, Question 151, Article 2, corp.
^ abcdefghijklm Ranke-Heinemann, Uta (1990). Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven. Doubleday Publishing.
^ Salzman, Todd A.; Lawler, Michael G. (2008). The Sexual Person: Toward a Renewed Catholic Anthropology. Georgetown University Press. p. 175. ISBN 9781589017269.
^ Obach, Robert (2008). The Catholic Church on Marital Intercourse: From St. Paul to Pope John Paul II. Lexington Books. pp. 22–26. ISBN 9780739130896.
^ Hunter, David G., ed. (2001). Marriage in the Early Church. Wipf and Stock Publishers. pp. 12–28. ISBN 9781579108274.
^ A.Kosnik and others, Human Sexuality. New Directions in Catholic Thought, Search Press, London 1977, pp. 219-229
^ Charles E. Curran; Richard A. McCormick (1999). The Historical Development of Fundamental Moral Theology in the United States. Paulist Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-8091-3879-1.
^ abc George Weigel (15 October 2007). Courage to Be Catholic: Crisis, Reform, and the Future of the Church. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00994-7.
^ Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (13 July 1979). "Observations about the book ""Human Sexuality". A study commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America, Rev. Anthony Kosnik editor"".
^ "CCC, 2072". Vatican.va.
^ CCC 2380-2381
^ Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologia I-II q. 60 a. 5
^ Catholic Encyclopedia, "Chastity"
^ Humanae vitae 12
^ Pope John Paul II, General Audience, Wednesday, November 14, 1984.
^ "CCC, 2337-2350". Vatican.va.
^ "Fathers Know Best Contraception". EWTN. Retrieved 2009-03-20.
^ "Contraception/Birth Control". Byzantines.net. Archived from the original on 2008-04-19. Retrieved 2009-03-20.
^ ""This Rock" Magazine". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "Fr. Hardon Archives - The Catholic Tradition on the Morality of Contraception". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ Dave Armstrong. "Biblical Evidence for Catholicism: Contraception: Early Church Teaching (William Klimon)". Archived from the original on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "CHURCH FATHERS: Letter 22 (Jerome)". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "CCC, 2366". Vatican.va.
^ Christopher West (2000). Good News about Sex and Marriage: Answers to Your Honest Questions about Catholic Teaching. Servant Publications. pp. 88–91. ISBN 1-56955-214-2.
^ Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "Birth Control". Archived from the original on 2016-11-29. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ Pope Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae vitae". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "CCC, 2368-2369". Vatican.va.
^ "Familiaris consortio". 22 November 1981. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ Holdren, Alan; Gagliarducci, Andrea. "Full text of Pope's in-flight interview from Manila to Rome". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
^ Holdren, Alan. "Pope: 'Responsible parenthood' doesn't mean birth control". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
^ Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ Hardon, John (2000). "Endometriosis". Modern Catholic Dictionary. Eternal Life. ISBN 0-9672989-2-X.
^ James T. Bretzke, S.J. (26 March 2007). "The Lesser Evil". America Magazine. Retrieved 2015-02-02.
^ Guevin, Benedict; Martin Rhonheimer (Spring 2005). "Debate: On the Use of Condoms to Prevent Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome". The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: 35–48.
^ May, William E. (Summer–Fall 2007). "The Theological Significance of Consummation of Marriage, Contraception, Using Condoms to Prevent HIV, and Same-Sex Unions". Josephinum Journal of Theology. Pittsfield, Massachusetts: Catholic Library Association. 14 (2): 207–217.
^ ab Jonathan Wynne-Jones (20 November 2010). "The Pope drops Catholic ban on condoms in historic shift". London: The Tepegraph. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
^ Donadio, Rachel; Goodstein, Laurie (23 November 2010). "Vatican Confirms Shift on Condoms as AIDS Prevention". The New York Times.
^ "CCC, 2353". Vatican.va.
^ abcd "CCC, 2357-2359". Vatican.va.
^ Schreck, Alan (1999). The Essential Catholic Catechism. Servant Publications. p. 314. ISBN 1-56955-128-6.
^ ab Scrimenti, Stephen M., ed. (2005). Catholic Social Ethics. Xulon Press. pp. 149–150. ISBN 1-597811-19X.
^ Kreeft, Peter (2001). Catholic Christianity. Ignatius Press. p. 249. ISBN 0-89870-798-6.
^ Rheinische Post: Eltern sollen ihre homosexuellen Kinder nicht verurteilen (german)
^ Spiegel.de: Vatikan zieht umstrittene Äußerung zu homosexuellen Kindern zurück
^ Tagesspiegel.de:Vatikan ändert Papst-Zitate zu homosexuellen Neigungen von Kindern
^ Deutschlandfunk.de: Vatikan relativiert Papst-Äußerungen zu Homosexualität, abgerufen am 28. August 2018
^ ab "CCC, 2352". Vatican.va.
^ Summa Theologica IIª-IIae, q. 154 a. 12 ad 4 (in Latin)
^ Summa Theologica IIª-IIae, q. 154 a. 11 co. (in Latin)
^ "FAQ - YOUCAT.us". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
^ "CCC, 2354". Vatican.va.
^ "CCC, 2355". Vatican.va.
^ "CCC, 2356". Vatican.va.
External links
"Sex & the Early Church" by Sam Torode