(Modular Arithmetic) Congruences With Exponents
$begingroup$
I am trying to find the following:
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$3^n equiv 1$ (mod $7$)
And hence $3^100$ (mod $7$).
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$5^n equiv 1$ (mod $17$) or $5^n equiv -1$ (mod $17$)
And hence evaluate $5^243$ (mod $17$).
Evaluate $2^4$ (mod $18$) and hence evaluate $2^300$ (mod $18$).
I've learned how to use the Euclidean algorithm, but I have no idea how to compute congruence when they have exponents, as above. These seem very daunting to me. I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to explain how this is done.
I will then post my work for each of these for, if possible, feedback on the solutions, since I do not have any solutions for these.
Thank you.
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to find the following:
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$3^n equiv 1$ (mod $7$)
And hence $3^100$ (mod $7$).
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$5^n equiv 1$ (mod $17$) or $5^n equiv -1$ (mod $17$)
And hence evaluate $5^243$ (mod $17$).
Evaluate $2^4$ (mod $18$) and hence evaluate $2^300$ (mod $18$).
I've learned how to use the Euclidean algorithm, but I have no idea how to compute congruence when they have exponents, as above. These seem very daunting to me. I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to explain how this is done.
I will then post my work for each of these for, if possible, feedback on the solutions, since I do not have any solutions for these.
Thank you.
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to find the following:
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$3^n equiv 1$ (mod $7$)
And hence $3^100$ (mod $7$).
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$5^n equiv 1$ (mod $17$) or $5^n equiv -1$ (mod $17$)
And hence evaluate $5^243$ (mod $17$).
Evaluate $2^4$ (mod $18$) and hence evaluate $2^300$ (mod $18$).
I've learned how to use the Euclidean algorithm, but I have no idea how to compute congruence when they have exponents, as above. These seem very daunting to me. I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to explain how this is done.
I will then post my work for each of these for, if possible, feedback on the solutions, since I do not have any solutions for these.
Thank you.
modular-arithmetic
$endgroup$
I am trying to find the following:
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$3^n equiv 1$ (mod $7$)
And hence $3^100$ (mod $7$).
The least positive integer $n$ for which
$5^n equiv 1$ (mod $17$) or $5^n equiv -1$ (mod $17$)
And hence evaluate $5^243$ (mod $17$).
Evaluate $2^4$ (mod $18$) and hence evaluate $2^300$ (mod $18$).
I've learned how to use the Euclidean algorithm, but I have no idea how to compute congruence when they have exponents, as above. These seem very daunting to me. I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to explain how this is done.
I will then post my work for each of these for, if possible, feedback on the solutions, since I do not have any solutions for these.
Thank you.
modular-arithmetic
modular-arithmetic
edited Aug 25 '18 at 10:29
The Pointer
asked Aug 25 '18 at 10:09
The PointerThe Pointer
2,60421336
2,60421336
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Regarding congruences with exponents - the cool thing about them is you can raise 'each side' to some power, or multiply them by a common factor and it remains true. It's often useful to show that $x^nequiv pm 1 pmod k $. Regarding your first question, we know $3equiv 3pmod 7 $ so $3^2equiv 2pmod 7$ since $9pmod 7=2$. So $3^3=3^2times 3equiv 2times 3=6equiv -1 pmod 7$. So $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$. Hence $(3^3)^2=3^6equiv (-1)^2=1pmod 7$. We know $3^100=3^6cdot 16+4=3^96cdot 3^3cdot 3$, and since we know the value of all these modulo $7$, $3^100$ is congruent mod $7$ to the product of them.
For your 2nd question, we can apply these same principles - it just takes a bit longer $$beginalign*5&equiv 5pmod 17 \ implies 5^2&equiv 8 pmod 17 \ implies 5^3&equiv 6pmod 17 qquad textsince $40pmod 17=6$ \ implies 5^4&equiv 13pmod 17qquad textsince $30pmod17=13$ \ &vdots \ implies 5^8&equiv -1pmod17endalign*$$Note that we could have directly obtained the final result by squaring both sides of the fourth line. So now $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^3=dots$
However, using Euler's theorem is usually faster - there's examples of solutions to similar problems within that link.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For the first two questions, Fermat's little theorem works because $7$ and $17$ are both prime. Now you can use the second form: $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ (if $a nmid p$ ).
For the last question, $2^4 pmod 18 equiv -2$. Then $(2^4)^4 = 2^16 equiv -2$, and $2^256 equiv -2$, so you can break up $300$ into powers of $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Usually the standard routine is to use Euler's theorem which states that:
Let $ainBbb Z_n$, if $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $$a^phi(n)equiv_n 1$$
$phi(n)$ is called the Euler totient function, and it is the number of integers $k$ such that $1leq k<n$ and $gcd(k,n)=1$.
For instance $phi(10)=4$ because there are only four integers less than $10$, that are relatively prime (no common factor) to $10$. $$colorgreen1,2,colorgreen3,4,5,6,colorgreen7,8,colorgreen9$$ This means that $$a^4equiv_101$$ if $gcd(a,10)=1$. So $$1^4equiv_101\3^4equiv_101\7^4equiv_101\9^4equiv_101$$
When $n=p$ is prime $phi(p)=p-1$. With $p=5$ we have $$1^4equiv_51\2^4equiv_51\3^4equiv_51\4^4equiv_51$$ This special case, with $p$ prime, is known as Fermat's little theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893975%2fmodular-arithmetic-congruences-with-exponents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Regarding congruences with exponents - the cool thing about them is you can raise 'each side' to some power, or multiply them by a common factor and it remains true. It's often useful to show that $x^nequiv pm 1 pmod k $. Regarding your first question, we know $3equiv 3pmod 7 $ so $3^2equiv 2pmod 7$ since $9pmod 7=2$. So $3^3=3^2times 3equiv 2times 3=6equiv -1 pmod 7$. So $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$. Hence $(3^3)^2=3^6equiv (-1)^2=1pmod 7$. We know $3^100=3^6cdot 16+4=3^96cdot 3^3cdot 3$, and since we know the value of all these modulo $7$, $3^100$ is congruent mod $7$ to the product of them.
For your 2nd question, we can apply these same principles - it just takes a bit longer $$beginalign*5&equiv 5pmod 17 \ implies 5^2&equiv 8 pmod 17 \ implies 5^3&equiv 6pmod 17 qquad textsince $40pmod 17=6$ \ implies 5^4&equiv 13pmod 17qquad textsince $30pmod17=13$ \ &vdots \ implies 5^8&equiv -1pmod17endalign*$$Note that we could have directly obtained the final result by squaring both sides of the fourth line. So now $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^3=dots$
However, using Euler's theorem is usually faster - there's examples of solutions to similar problems within that link.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding congruences with exponents - the cool thing about them is you can raise 'each side' to some power, or multiply them by a common factor and it remains true. It's often useful to show that $x^nequiv pm 1 pmod k $. Regarding your first question, we know $3equiv 3pmod 7 $ so $3^2equiv 2pmod 7$ since $9pmod 7=2$. So $3^3=3^2times 3equiv 2times 3=6equiv -1 pmod 7$. So $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$. Hence $(3^3)^2=3^6equiv (-1)^2=1pmod 7$. We know $3^100=3^6cdot 16+4=3^96cdot 3^3cdot 3$, and since we know the value of all these modulo $7$, $3^100$ is congruent mod $7$ to the product of them.
For your 2nd question, we can apply these same principles - it just takes a bit longer $$beginalign*5&equiv 5pmod 17 \ implies 5^2&equiv 8 pmod 17 \ implies 5^3&equiv 6pmod 17 qquad textsince $40pmod 17=6$ \ implies 5^4&equiv 13pmod 17qquad textsince $30pmod17=13$ \ &vdots \ implies 5^8&equiv -1pmod17endalign*$$Note that we could have directly obtained the final result by squaring both sides of the fourth line. So now $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^3=dots$
However, using Euler's theorem is usually faster - there's examples of solutions to similar problems within that link.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Regarding congruences with exponents - the cool thing about them is you can raise 'each side' to some power, or multiply them by a common factor and it remains true. It's often useful to show that $x^nequiv pm 1 pmod k $. Regarding your first question, we know $3equiv 3pmod 7 $ so $3^2equiv 2pmod 7$ since $9pmod 7=2$. So $3^3=3^2times 3equiv 2times 3=6equiv -1 pmod 7$. So $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$. Hence $(3^3)^2=3^6equiv (-1)^2=1pmod 7$. We know $3^100=3^6cdot 16+4=3^96cdot 3^3cdot 3$, and since we know the value of all these modulo $7$, $3^100$ is congruent mod $7$ to the product of them.
For your 2nd question, we can apply these same principles - it just takes a bit longer $$beginalign*5&equiv 5pmod 17 \ implies 5^2&equiv 8 pmod 17 \ implies 5^3&equiv 6pmod 17 qquad textsince $40pmod 17=6$ \ implies 5^4&equiv 13pmod 17qquad textsince $30pmod17=13$ \ &vdots \ implies 5^8&equiv -1pmod17endalign*$$Note that we could have directly obtained the final result by squaring both sides of the fourth line. So now $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^3=dots$
However, using Euler's theorem is usually faster - there's examples of solutions to similar problems within that link.
$endgroup$
Regarding congruences with exponents - the cool thing about them is you can raise 'each side' to some power, or multiply them by a common factor and it remains true. It's often useful to show that $x^nequiv pm 1 pmod k $. Regarding your first question, we know $3equiv 3pmod 7 $ so $3^2equiv 2pmod 7$ since $9pmod 7=2$. So $3^3=3^2times 3equiv 2times 3=6equiv -1 pmod 7$. So $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$. Hence $(3^3)^2=3^6equiv (-1)^2=1pmod 7$. We know $3^100=3^6cdot 16+4=3^96cdot 3^3cdot 3$, and since we know the value of all these modulo $7$, $3^100$ is congruent mod $7$ to the product of them.
For your 2nd question, we can apply these same principles - it just takes a bit longer $$beginalign*5&equiv 5pmod 17 \ implies 5^2&equiv 8 pmod 17 \ implies 5^3&equiv 6pmod 17 qquad textsince $40pmod 17=6$ \ implies 5^4&equiv 13pmod 17qquad textsince $30pmod17=13$ \ &vdots \ implies 5^8&equiv -1pmod17endalign*$$Note that we could have directly obtained the final result by squaring both sides of the fourth line. So now $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^3=dots$
However, using Euler's theorem is usually faster - there's examples of solutions to similar problems within that link.
edited Aug 25 '18 at 11:30
The Pointer
2,60421336
2,60421336
answered Aug 25 '18 at 10:39
JazzachiJazzachi
8971519
8971519
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
$begingroup$
I just edited the missing $-1$ in for you.
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:08
1
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We know $3^3equiv -1 pmod 7$ so $3^6equiv 1pmod 7$. So $3^96equiv 1pmod 7$. We also know $3equiv 3pmod 7$. So $3^100=3^96times 3^3times 3equiv (1)(-1)(3)$, hence $3^100equiv 4pmod 7$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:12
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
$begingroup$
So for the second one, we have $5^243=(5^8)^30cdot 5^4= 5^4 equiv 13$ (mod $17$)?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:27
1
1
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@ThePointer Minor typo, should be $5^3$ not $5^4$. But your approach is correct, and since $5^3equiv 6 pmod 17$, $5^243equiv 6pmod 17$.
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 11:29
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Ok, great, I think I understand it now! Thank you very much for taking the time to explain this to me. I found this very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 11:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
For the first two questions, Fermat's little theorem works because $7$ and $17$ are both prime. Now you can use the second form: $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ (if $a nmid p$ ).
For the last question, $2^4 pmod 18 equiv -2$. Then $(2^4)^4 = 2^16 equiv -2$, and $2^256 equiv -2$, so you can break up $300$ into powers of $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint:
For the first two questions, Fermat's little theorem works because $7$ and $17$ are both prime. Now you can use the second form: $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ (if $a nmid p$ ).
For the last question, $2^4 pmod 18 equiv -2$. Then $(2^4)^4 = 2^16 equiv -2$, and $2^256 equiv -2$, so you can break up $300$ into powers of $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint:
For the first two questions, Fermat's little theorem works because $7$ and $17$ are both prime. Now you can use the second form: $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ (if $a nmid p$ ).
For the last question, $2^4 pmod 18 equiv -2$. Then $(2^4)^4 = 2^16 equiv -2$, and $2^256 equiv -2$, so you can break up $300$ into powers of $4$.
$endgroup$
Hint:
For the first two questions, Fermat's little theorem works because $7$ and $17$ are both prime. Now you can use the second form: $a^p-1 equiv 1 pmod p$ (if $a nmid p$ ).
For the last question, $2^4 pmod 18 equiv -2$. Then $(2^4)^4 = 2^16 equiv -2$, and $2^256 equiv -2$, so you can break up $300$ into powers of $4$.
edited Aug 25 '18 at 10:23
answered Aug 25 '18 at 10:15
Toby MakToby Mak
3,37811128
3,37811128
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
But this isn't a general way to solve these problems?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:19
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
@ThePointer It depends on the question. Luckily, this is an exercise, so they might want you to notice that $7$ and $17$ are both prime. If you have to use Euler's totient function, you might use the identity for $phi(mn)$ and carry on from there.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:22
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
I don't understand why we use the second form? We don't even know what $p$ is, so how do we know whether to use the first or second form?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:31
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
@ThePointer We can use the second form because $a$ does not divide $p$ in your questions (if $p = 7$, $a$ is not $14, 21, 28$ etc.). $p$ is prime.
$endgroup$
– Toby Mak
Aug 25 '18 at 10:34
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
$begingroup$
Hmm, I see. But the Wikipedia article also assumes that $n = p$? That doesn't necessarily have to be true for this problem, right? So is it valid for us to use this method?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Usually the standard routine is to use Euler's theorem which states that:
Let $ainBbb Z_n$, if $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $$a^phi(n)equiv_n 1$$
$phi(n)$ is called the Euler totient function, and it is the number of integers $k$ such that $1leq k<n$ and $gcd(k,n)=1$.
For instance $phi(10)=4$ because there are only four integers less than $10$, that are relatively prime (no common factor) to $10$. $$colorgreen1,2,colorgreen3,4,5,6,colorgreen7,8,colorgreen9$$ This means that $$a^4equiv_101$$ if $gcd(a,10)=1$. So $$1^4equiv_101\3^4equiv_101\7^4equiv_101\9^4equiv_101$$
When $n=p$ is prime $phi(p)=p-1$. With $p=5$ we have $$1^4equiv_51\2^4equiv_51\3^4equiv_51\4^4equiv_51$$ This special case, with $p$ prime, is known as Fermat's little theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Usually the standard routine is to use Euler's theorem which states that:
Let $ainBbb Z_n$, if $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $$a^phi(n)equiv_n 1$$
$phi(n)$ is called the Euler totient function, and it is the number of integers $k$ such that $1leq k<n$ and $gcd(k,n)=1$.
For instance $phi(10)=4$ because there are only four integers less than $10$, that are relatively prime (no common factor) to $10$. $$colorgreen1,2,colorgreen3,4,5,6,colorgreen7,8,colorgreen9$$ This means that $$a^4equiv_101$$ if $gcd(a,10)=1$. So $$1^4equiv_101\3^4equiv_101\7^4equiv_101\9^4equiv_101$$
When $n=p$ is prime $phi(p)=p-1$. With $p=5$ we have $$1^4equiv_51\2^4equiv_51\3^4equiv_51\4^4equiv_51$$ This special case, with $p$ prime, is known as Fermat's little theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Usually the standard routine is to use Euler's theorem which states that:
Let $ainBbb Z_n$, if $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $$a^phi(n)equiv_n 1$$
$phi(n)$ is called the Euler totient function, and it is the number of integers $k$ such that $1leq k<n$ and $gcd(k,n)=1$.
For instance $phi(10)=4$ because there are only four integers less than $10$, that are relatively prime (no common factor) to $10$. $$colorgreen1,2,colorgreen3,4,5,6,colorgreen7,8,colorgreen9$$ This means that $$a^4equiv_101$$ if $gcd(a,10)=1$. So $$1^4equiv_101\3^4equiv_101\7^4equiv_101\9^4equiv_101$$
When $n=p$ is prime $phi(p)=p-1$. With $p=5$ we have $$1^4equiv_51\2^4equiv_51\3^4equiv_51\4^4equiv_51$$ This special case, with $p$ prime, is known as Fermat's little theorem.
$endgroup$
Usually the standard routine is to use Euler's theorem which states that:
Let $ainBbb Z_n$, if $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $$a^phi(n)equiv_n 1$$
$phi(n)$ is called the Euler totient function, and it is the number of integers $k$ such that $1leq k<n$ and $gcd(k,n)=1$.
For instance $phi(10)=4$ because there are only four integers less than $10$, that are relatively prime (no common factor) to $10$. $$colorgreen1,2,colorgreen3,4,5,6,colorgreen7,8,colorgreen9$$ This means that $$a^4equiv_101$$ if $gcd(a,10)=1$. So $$1^4equiv_101\3^4equiv_101\7^4equiv_101\9^4equiv_101$$
When $n=p$ is prime $phi(p)=p-1$. With $p=5$ we have $$1^4equiv_51\2^4equiv_51\3^4equiv_51\4^4equiv_51$$ This special case, with $p$ prime, is known as Fermat's little theorem.
edited Aug 25 '18 at 11:40
answered Aug 25 '18 at 11:33
cansomeonehelpmeoutcansomeonehelpmeout
6,7923835
6,7923835
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893975%2fmodular-arithmetic-congruences-with-exponents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have you heard of Euler's totient function?
$endgroup$
– Jazzachi
Aug 25 '18 at 10:13
$begingroup$
@Jazzachi No, and nor were we taught it. So I think my instructors want us to solve this through other means?
$endgroup$
– The Pointer
Aug 25 '18 at 10:14