When is there a high chance of seeing the aurora from Sweden?
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In what time of the year is there a high chance of having a visible aurora borealis in Sweden?
Are there significant differences between areas in Sweden regarding visibility of the aurora?
Obviously this will depend on cloud cover, so it is understandable that there is no certainty of seeing the aurora even if it is happening, so I would plan to be there for several days.
sweden seasonal auroras
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In what time of the year is there a high chance of having a visible aurora borealis in Sweden?
Are there significant differences between areas in Sweden regarding visibility of the aurora?
Obviously this will depend on cloud cover, so it is understandable that there is no certainty of seeing the aurora even if it is happening, so I would plan to be there for several days.
sweden seasonal auroras
2
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In what time of the year is there a high chance of having a visible aurora borealis in Sweden?
Are there significant differences between areas in Sweden regarding visibility of the aurora?
Obviously this will depend on cloud cover, so it is understandable that there is no certainty of seeing the aurora even if it is happening, so I would plan to be there for several days.
sweden seasonal auroras
In what time of the year is there a high chance of having a visible aurora borealis in Sweden?
Are there significant differences between areas in Sweden regarding visibility of the aurora?
Obviously this will depend on cloud cover, so it is understandable that there is no certainty of seeing the aurora even if it is happening, so I would plan to be there for several days.
sweden seasonal auroras
sweden seasonal auroras
asked Sep 18 '17 at 22:49
Itai
28.1k964145
28.1k964145
2
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56
add a comment |
2
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56
2
2
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I researched this a little bit last year when planning a trip to Norway during which I saw several auroras. In theory, the best is around the equinox but you should really go in the middle of the winter, mostly to have as much darkness as possible. There is a multi-year cycle but the peak was a few years ago and waiting until 2025 or so is not very practical advice. There are also short-term fluctuations that cannot be predicted reliably enough to be useful for planning (but get an app to get an alert while you're there).
As far as location is concerned, there is a kind of ring or doughnut around the Arctic where auroras are most visible but anywhere in Northern Scandinavia should be good. The biggie is really cloud cover. Planning several days to maximise your chances is good but also think about local climate differences: Local topography (mountains, distance to the sea) can make a significant difference. Compare potential locations using past weather data and decide based on this.
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Geographically you want to be in the northernmost third of the country. The further north the better. Auroras in southern Sweden are few and far between. You also need to be away from any big cities to avoid light pollution. The three major cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö are both too far south and too light polluted for good auroras. Cities like Luleå and Kiruna have lots of nights with visible auroras every year, to give you an idea of where you want to be to see auroras. Make sure you have something to do if you don't see auroras.
As mentioned in the other answer, the theoretical best time for auroras is not exactly mid-winter but slightly before and after, but this variation doesn't matter much compared to the probability of clear skies, which is usually better the colder the weather is. January and februrary probably have the best probability to get that cold weather with clear skies.
Go do something touristy in an area with possibility of auroras, and if you see auroras it's a bonus. Otherwise it will be a slow, expensive and boring wait for nothing. The Jukkasjärvi ice hotel, the Jokkmokk market, or Skiing in riksgränsen are popular winter attractions in northernmost Sweden. Also consider places in northern Norway like Narvik or Tromsø which have very spectacular scenery. Note that depending on your preferred activity, you may want to wait a little longer into spring. The sun doesn't go up at all for a couple of weeeks in mid winter, making some activities tricky. For example, for skiing at Riksgränsen you want to wait until late march at least.
To summarize:
- Go above 65 deg north if possible
- Go in mid winter like jan/feb, march or april if you don't want constant darkness.
- Make saure to have something else planned apart from chasing auroras
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You'll have the best chance in Northern Scandinavia and by joining an aurora bus tour that will drive you to wherever the overcast is the least, whether that's in Norway, Sweden or Finland. Many such tours leave at 5 pm and return you to your hotel at 11 pm but sometimes as late as 3 am. The aurora is visible every day during fall, winter and spring above the polar circle provided it's not overcast. But when the solar activity is low, the aurora will be weak.
It's worthwhile to take good camera equipment with you. You should have a tripod and a remote control for your camera (or you can use a timer). If you arrive early at a good location, you can often already take pictures of the aurora when it's not yet visible to the naked eye. I've seen the aurora several times in Northern Norway, the very first time was on my camera screen of a picture of the sky just above the horizon in the East to North Eastern direction, it was a one minute exposure at ISO 800. The first time I saw it with the naked eye was an hour later when it appeared much higher in the sky.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I researched this a little bit last year when planning a trip to Norway during which I saw several auroras. In theory, the best is around the equinox but you should really go in the middle of the winter, mostly to have as much darkness as possible. There is a multi-year cycle but the peak was a few years ago and waiting until 2025 or so is not very practical advice. There are also short-term fluctuations that cannot be predicted reliably enough to be useful for planning (but get an app to get an alert while you're there).
As far as location is concerned, there is a kind of ring or doughnut around the Arctic where auroras are most visible but anywhere in Northern Scandinavia should be good. The biggie is really cloud cover. Planning several days to maximise your chances is good but also think about local climate differences: Local topography (mountains, distance to the sea) can make a significant difference. Compare potential locations using past weather data and decide based on this.
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I researched this a little bit last year when planning a trip to Norway during which I saw several auroras. In theory, the best is around the equinox but you should really go in the middle of the winter, mostly to have as much darkness as possible. There is a multi-year cycle but the peak was a few years ago and waiting until 2025 or so is not very practical advice. There are also short-term fluctuations that cannot be predicted reliably enough to be useful for planning (but get an app to get an alert while you're there).
As far as location is concerned, there is a kind of ring or doughnut around the Arctic where auroras are most visible but anywhere in Northern Scandinavia should be good. The biggie is really cloud cover. Planning several days to maximise your chances is good but also think about local climate differences: Local topography (mountains, distance to the sea) can make a significant difference. Compare potential locations using past weather data and decide based on this.
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I researched this a little bit last year when planning a trip to Norway during which I saw several auroras. In theory, the best is around the equinox but you should really go in the middle of the winter, mostly to have as much darkness as possible. There is a multi-year cycle but the peak was a few years ago and waiting until 2025 or so is not very practical advice. There are also short-term fluctuations that cannot be predicted reliably enough to be useful for planning (but get an app to get an alert while you're there).
As far as location is concerned, there is a kind of ring or doughnut around the Arctic where auroras are most visible but anywhere in Northern Scandinavia should be good. The biggie is really cloud cover. Planning several days to maximise your chances is good but also think about local climate differences: Local topography (mountains, distance to the sea) can make a significant difference. Compare potential locations using past weather data and decide based on this.
I researched this a little bit last year when planning a trip to Norway during which I saw several auroras. In theory, the best is around the equinox but you should really go in the middle of the winter, mostly to have as much darkness as possible. There is a multi-year cycle but the peak was a few years ago and waiting until 2025 or so is not very practical advice. There are also short-term fluctuations that cannot be predicted reliably enough to be useful for planning (but get an app to get an alert while you're there).
As far as location is concerned, there is a kind of ring or doughnut around the Arctic where auroras are most visible but anywhere in Northern Scandinavia should be good. The biggie is really cloud cover. Planning several days to maximise your chances is good but also think about local climate differences: Local topography (mountains, distance to the sea) can make a significant difference. Compare potential locations using past weather data and decide based on this.
answered Sep 18 '17 at 23:20
Relaxed
75.5k10148281
75.5k10148281
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
add a comment |
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
When you say around the equinox, do you mean ± a few days or a few weeks?
– Itai
Sep 20 '17 at 15:19
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
@Itai About a month apparently.
– Relaxed
Sep 28 '17 at 23:08
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Geographically you want to be in the northernmost third of the country. The further north the better. Auroras in southern Sweden are few and far between. You also need to be away from any big cities to avoid light pollution. The three major cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö are both too far south and too light polluted for good auroras. Cities like Luleå and Kiruna have lots of nights with visible auroras every year, to give you an idea of where you want to be to see auroras. Make sure you have something to do if you don't see auroras.
As mentioned in the other answer, the theoretical best time for auroras is not exactly mid-winter but slightly before and after, but this variation doesn't matter much compared to the probability of clear skies, which is usually better the colder the weather is. January and februrary probably have the best probability to get that cold weather with clear skies.
Go do something touristy in an area with possibility of auroras, and if you see auroras it's a bonus. Otherwise it will be a slow, expensive and boring wait for nothing. The Jukkasjärvi ice hotel, the Jokkmokk market, or Skiing in riksgränsen are popular winter attractions in northernmost Sweden. Also consider places in northern Norway like Narvik or Tromsø which have very spectacular scenery. Note that depending on your preferred activity, you may want to wait a little longer into spring. The sun doesn't go up at all for a couple of weeeks in mid winter, making some activities tricky. For example, for skiing at Riksgränsen you want to wait until late march at least.
To summarize:
- Go above 65 deg north if possible
- Go in mid winter like jan/feb, march or april if you don't want constant darkness.
- Make saure to have something else planned apart from chasing auroras
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Geographically you want to be in the northernmost third of the country. The further north the better. Auroras in southern Sweden are few and far between. You also need to be away from any big cities to avoid light pollution. The three major cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö are both too far south and too light polluted for good auroras. Cities like Luleå and Kiruna have lots of nights with visible auroras every year, to give you an idea of where you want to be to see auroras. Make sure you have something to do if you don't see auroras.
As mentioned in the other answer, the theoretical best time for auroras is not exactly mid-winter but slightly before and after, but this variation doesn't matter much compared to the probability of clear skies, which is usually better the colder the weather is. January and februrary probably have the best probability to get that cold weather with clear skies.
Go do something touristy in an area with possibility of auroras, and if you see auroras it's a bonus. Otherwise it will be a slow, expensive and boring wait for nothing. The Jukkasjärvi ice hotel, the Jokkmokk market, or Skiing in riksgränsen are popular winter attractions in northernmost Sweden. Also consider places in northern Norway like Narvik or Tromsø which have very spectacular scenery. Note that depending on your preferred activity, you may want to wait a little longer into spring. The sun doesn't go up at all for a couple of weeeks in mid winter, making some activities tricky. For example, for skiing at Riksgränsen you want to wait until late march at least.
To summarize:
- Go above 65 deg north if possible
- Go in mid winter like jan/feb, march or april if you don't want constant darkness.
- Make saure to have something else planned apart from chasing auroras
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Geographically you want to be in the northernmost third of the country. The further north the better. Auroras in southern Sweden are few and far between. You also need to be away from any big cities to avoid light pollution. The three major cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö are both too far south and too light polluted for good auroras. Cities like Luleå and Kiruna have lots of nights with visible auroras every year, to give you an idea of where you want to be to see auroras. Make sure you have something to do if you don't see auroras.
As mentioned in the other answer, the theoretical best time for auroras is not exactly mid-winter but slightly before and after, but this variation doesn't matter much compared to the probability of clear skies, which is usually better the colder the weather is. January and februrary probably have the best probability to get that cold weather with clear skies.
Go do something touristy in an area with possibility of auroras, and if you see auroras it's a bonus. Otherwise it will be a slow, expensive and boring wait for nothing. The Jukkasjärvi ice hotel, the Jokkmokk market, or Skiing in riksgränsen are popular winter attractions in northernmost Sweden. Also consider places in northern Norway like Narvik or Tromsø which have very spectacular scenery. Note that depending on your preferred activity, you may want to wait a little longer into spring. The sun doesn't go up at all for a couple of weeeks in mid winter, making some activities tricky. For example, for skiing at Riksgränsen you want to wait until late march at least.
To summarize:
- Go above 65 deg north if possible
- Go in mid winter like jan/feb, march or april if you don't want constant darkness.
- Make saure to have something else planned apart from chasing auroras
Geographically you want to be in the northernmost third of the country. The further north the better. Auroras in southern Sweden are few and far between. You also need to be away from any big cities to avoid light pollution. The three major cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö are both too far south and too light polluted for good auroras. Cities like Luleå and Kiruna have lots of nights with visible auroras every year, to give you an idea of where you want to be to see auroras. Make sure you have something to do if you don't see auroras.
As mentioned in the other answer, the theoretical best time for auroras is not exactly mid-winter but slightly before and after, but this variation doesn't matter much compared to the probability of clear skies, which is usually better the colder the weather is. January and februrary probably have the best probability to get that cold weather with clear skies.
Go do something touristy in an area with possibility of auroras, and if you see auroras it's a bonus. Otherwise it will be a slow, expensive and boring wait for nothing. The Jukkasjärvi ice hotel, the Jokkmokk market, or Skiing in riksgränsen are popular winter attractions in northernmost Sweden. Also consider places in northern Norway like Narvik or Tromsø which have very spectacular scenery. Note that depending on your preferred activity, you may want to wait a little longer into spring. The sun doesn't go up at all for a couple of weeeks in mid winter, making some activities tricky. For example, for skiing at Riksgränsen you want to wait until late march at least.
To summarize:
- Go above 65 deg north if possible
- Go in mid winter like jan/feb, march or april if you don't want constant darkness.
- Make saure to have something else planned apart from chasing auroras
answered Sep 25 '17 at 10:29
Anders Forsgren
1313
1313
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You'll have the best chance in Northern Scandinavia and by joining an aurora bus tour that will drive you to wherever the overcast is the least, whether that's in Norway, Sweden or Finland. Many such tours leave at 5 pm and return you to your hotel at 11 pm but sometimes as late as 3 am. The aurora is visible every day during fall, winter and spring above the polar circle provided it's not overcast. But when the solar activity is low, the aurora will be weak.
It's worthwhile to take good camera equipment with you. You should have a tripod and a remote control for your camera (or you can use a timer). If you arrive early at a good location, you can often already take pictures of the aurora when it's not yet visible to the naked eye. I've seen the aurora several times in Northern Norway, the very first time was on my camera screen of a picture of the sky just above the horizon in the East to North Eastern direction, it was a one minute exposure at ISO 800. The first time I saw it with the naked eye was an hour later when it appeared much higher in the sky.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You'll have the best chance in Northern Scandinavia and by joining an aurora bus tour that will drive you to wherever the overcast is the least, whether that's in Norway, Sweden or Finland. Many such tours leave at 5 pm and return you to your hotel at 11 pm but sometimes as late as 3 am. The aurora is visible every day during fall, winter and spring above the polar circle provided it's not overcast. But when the solar activity is low, the aurora will be weak.
It's worthwhile to take good camera equipment with you. You should have a tripod and a remote control for your camera (or you can use a timer). If you arrive early at a good location, you can often already take pictures of the aurora when it's not yet visible to the naked eye. I've seen the aurora several times in Northern Norway, the very first time was on my camera screen of a picture of the sky just above the horizon in the East to North Eastern direction, it was a one minute exposure at ISO 800. The first time I saw it with the naked eye was an hour later when it appeared much higher in the sky.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You'll have the best chance in Northern Scandinavia and by joining an aurora bus tour that will drive you to wherever the overcast is the least, whether that's in Norway, Sweden or Finland. Many such tours leave at 5 pm and return you to your hotel at 11 pm but sometimes as late as 3 am. The aurora is visible every day during fall, winter and spring above the polar circle provided it's not overcast. But when the solar activity is low, the aurora will be weak.
It's worthwhile to take good camera equipment with you. You should have a tripod and a remote control for your camera (or you can use a timer). If you arrive early at a good location, you can often already take pictures of the aurora when it's not yet visible to the naked eye. I've seen the aurora several times in Northern Norway, the very first time was on my camera screen of a picture of the sky just above the horizon in the East to North Eastern direction, it was a one minute exposure at ISO 800. The first time I saw it with the naked eye was an hour later when it appeared much higher in the sky.
You'll have the best chance in Northern Scandinavia and by joining an aurora bus tour that will drive you to wherever the overcast is the least, whether that's in Norway, Sweden or Finland. Many such tours leave at 5 pm and return you to your hotel at 11 pm but sometimes as late as 3 am. The aurora is visible every day during fall, winter and spring above the polar circle provided it's not overcast. But when the solar activity is low, the aurora will be weak.
It's worthwhile to take good camera equipment with you. You should have a tripod and a remote control for your camera (or you can use a timer). If you arrive early at a good location, you can often already take pictures of the aurora when it's not yet visible to the naked eye. I've seen the aurora several times in Northern Norway, the very first time was on my camera screen of a picture of the sky just above the horizon in the East to North Eastern direction, it was a one minute exposure at ISO 800. The first time I saw it with the naked eye was an hour later when it appeared much higher in the sky.
answered Sep 26 '17 at 0:14
Count Iblis
2,304719
2,304719
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102329%2fwhen-is-there-a-high-chance-of-seeing-the-aurora-from-sweden%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Definitely not during summer when parts of the country have 24 hours of daylight ;) (this might seem obvious but it took me well into adulthood to have this occur to me)
– Mark Mayo♦
Sep 18 '17 at 23:56