Is it safe to travel to Iraqi Kurdistan? [closed]










6















Considering the current situation with ISIS in Iraq, is it safe for U.S. citizens to travel to Erbil and other major cities (Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah) in the Kurdish provinces in Iraq? Are there any U.S.-based travel agencies that could help arrange a tour of the region?










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by CMaster, JoErNanO, Berwyn, David Richerby, JonathanReez Jul 8 '16 at 13:25


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

    – Michael Hampton
    Jul 8 '16 at 6:37











  • @MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 9:04






  • 1





    Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

    – CMaster
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:16











  • I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:45















6















Considering the current situation with ISIS in Iraq, is it safe for U.S. citizens to travel to Erbil and other major cities (Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah) in the Kurdish provinces in Iraq? Are there any U.S.-based travel agencies that could help arrange a tour of the region?










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by CMaster, JoErNanO, Berwyn, David Richerby, JonathanReez Jul 8 '16 at 13:25


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 1





    The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

    – Michael Hampton
    Jul 8 '16 at 6:37











  • @MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 9:04






  • 1





    Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

    – CMaster
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:16











  • I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:45













6












6








6








Considering the current situation with ISIS in Iraq, is it safe for U.S. citizens to travel to Erbil and other major cities (Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah) in the Kurdish provinces in Iraq? Are there any U.S.-based travel agencies that could help arrange a tour of the region?










share|improve this question
















Considering the current situation with ISIS in Iraq, is it safe for U.S. citizens to travel to Erbil and other major cities (Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah) in the Kurdish provinces in Iraq? Are there any U.S.-based travel agencies that could help arrange a tour of the region?







safety event-based-effects iraqi-kurdistan iraq






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 8 '16 at 6:30









JonathanReez

49.8k41237510




49.8k41237510










asked Jul 8 '16 at 1:07









AustinAustin

333




333




closed as primarily opinion-based by CMaster, JoErNanO, Berwyn, David Richerby, JonathanReez Jul 8 '16 at 13:25


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by CMaster, JoErNanO, Berwyn, David Richerby, JonathanReez Jul 8 '16 at 13:25


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1





    The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

    – Michael Hampton
    Jul 8 '16 at 6:37











  • @MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 9:04






  • 1





    Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

    – CMaster
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:16











  • I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:45












  • 1





    The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

    – Michael Hampton
    Jul 8 '16 at 6:37











  • @MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 9:04






  • 1





    Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

    – CMaster
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:16











  • I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:45







1




1





The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

– Michael Hampton
Jul 8 '16 at 6:37





The State Department says it's not safe, even in the areas you've mentioned.

– Michael Hampton
Jul 8 '16 at 6:37













@MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

– JonathanReez
Jul 8 '16 at 9:04





@MichaelHampton it says the same about Crimea, which is perfectly safe. I'm not saying Kurdistan is safe to visit, but the State Department is not always correct.

– JonathanReez
Jul 8 '16 at 9:04




1




1





Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

– CMaster
Jul 8 '16 at 11:16





Safe by what standard? Where in the world do you consider "safe" enough?

– CMaster
Jul 8 '16 at 11:16













I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

– Austin
Jul 9 '16 at 12:45





I've found that State travel warnings are not always a reliable signal of the security situation on the ground -- Uganda and Vietnsm were great trios despite the warnings. Both were considerably safer than my hometown of Southside Chicago!

– Austin
Jul 9 '16 at 12:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














I travelled to Erbil two months back. You should not have any issues but it is not advised to stay for many weeks. The same is not the case with Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah. During my stay I was advised to not leave Erbil city because of possibility of widespread terror attacks. However, i am not sure if this qualifies for all types of trips. It is not a place for tourism at this point of time. However, if you are on some sort of business trip it should be quite safe.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:46











  • Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

    – DarthVader
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:53






  • 1





    +1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

    – user568458
    Jul 8 '16 at 15:27












  • Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

    – DarthVader
    Jul 9 '16 at 8:14











  • Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:43

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














I travelled to Erbil two months back. You should not have any issues but it is not advised to stay for many weeks. The same is not the case with Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah. During my stay I was advised to not leave Erbil city because of possibility of widespread terror attacks. However, i am not sure if this qualifies for all types of trips. It is not a place for tourism at this point of time. However, if you are on some sort of business trip it should be quite safe.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:46











  • Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

    – DarthVader
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:53






  • 1





    +1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

    – user568458
    Jul 8 '16 at 15:27












  • Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

    – DarthVader
    Jul 9 '16 at 8:14











  • Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:43















7














I travelled to Erbil two months back. You should not have any issues but it is not advised to stay for many weeks. The same is not the case with Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah. During my stay I was advised to not leave Erbil city because of possibility of widespread terror attacks. However, i am not sure if this qualifies for all types of trips. It is not a place for tourism at this point of time. However, if you are on some sort of business trip it should be quite safe.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:46











  • Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

    – DarthVader
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:53






  • 1





    +1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

    – user568458
    Jul 8 '16 at 15:27












  • Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

    – DarthVader
    Jul 9 '16 at 8:14











  • Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:43













7












7








7







I travelled to Erbil two months back. You should not have any issues but it is not advised to stay for many weeks. The same is not the case with Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah. During my stay I was advised to not leave Erbil city because of possibility of widespread terror attacks. However, i am not sure if this qualifies for all types of trips. It is not a place for tourism at this point of time. However, if you are on some sort of business trip it should be quite safe.






share|improve this answer













I travelled to Erbil two months back. You should not have any issues but it is not advised to stay for many weeks. The same is not the case with Kirkuk and Sulaymaniyah. During my stay I was advised to not leave Erbil city because of possibility of widespread terror attacks. However, i am not sure if this qualifies for all types of trips. It is not a place for tourism at this point of time. However, if you are on some sort of business trip it should be quite safe.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 8 '16 at 11:20









DarthVaderDarthVader

2,44431741




2,44431741







  • 1





    Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:46











  • Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

    – DarthVader
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:53






  • 1





    +1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

    – user568458
    Jul 8 '16 at 15:27












  • Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

    – DarthVader
    Jul 9 '16 at 8:14











  • Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:43












  • 1





    Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

    – JonathanReez
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:46











  • Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

    – DarthVader
    Jul 8 '16 at 11:53






  • 1





    +1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

    – user568458
    Jul 8 '16 at 15:27












  • Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

    – DarthVader
    Jul 9 '16 at 8:14











  • Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

    – Austin
    Jul 9 '16 at 12:43







1




1





Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

– JonathanReez
Jul 8 '16 at 11:46





Perhaps you could answer another question about Kurdistan? :)

– JonathanReez
Jul 8 '16 at 11:46













Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

– DarthVader
Jul 8 '16 at 11:53





Nope. I was there for a little under 6 days and I had nothing to do with a blood test. And it seems like the user wanted this info a year ago :)

– DarthVader
Jul 8 '16 at 11:53




1




1





+1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

– user568458
Jul 8 '16 at 15:27






+1 I know a few people who've been to Erbil recently on business related trips - security is tight. I wouldn't go there on holiday though because a) you'd be an unnecessary burden on security, b) consensus seems to be, it's pretty dull (for obvious reasons), c) you really should have a reliable, professional local contact to make sure you're travelling safely, only have safe drivers, etc.

– user568458
Jul 8 '16 at 15:27














Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

– DarthVader
Jul 9 '16 at 8:14





Yeah that's true. Make sure you take a room in one of the established hotels near the city center. Or in one of the residential "villages" which come with their own security personnel.

– DarthVader
Jul 9 '16 at 8:14













Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

– Austin
Jul 9 '16 at 12:43





Looking go do some dissertation research in Erbil, so I'd need to be there for several weeks. I'm looking to establish a research affiliation and find a reliable local host; not looking to go too far afield.

– Austin
Jul 9 '16 at 12:43



Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)