Should a non-EU citizen always carry his/her passport in Germany?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












The new EU-like Turkish ID cards are not valid in the EU countries yet, but I wonder if I need to carry my passport while already in an EU country (e.g. Germany).



Unlike this question, I don't intend to move to another country without my passport. For example, I just go from a hotel to an office. May I leave my passport at the hotel in this case?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 6 '17 at 10:58






  • 4




    I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:04






  • 4




    @ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:11







  • 4




    @emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
    – phoog
    Nov 6 '17 at 16:36






  • 2




    @emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
    – Michael Kjörling
    Nov 6 '17 at 21:10

















up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1












The new EU-like Turkish ID cards are not valid in the EU countries yet, but I wonder if I need to carry my passport while already in an EU country (e.g. Germany).



Unlike this question, I don't intend to move to another country without my passport. For example, I just go from a hotel to an office. May I leave my passport at the hotel in this case?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 6 '17 at 10:58






  • 4




    I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:04






  • 4




    @ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:11







  • 4




    @emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
    – phoog
    Nov 6 '17 at 16:36






  • 2




    @emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
    – Michael Kjörling
    Nov 6 '17 at 21:10













up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
18
down vote

favorite
1






1





The new EU-like Turkish ID cards are not valid in the EU countries yet, but I wonder if I need to carry my passport while already in an EU country (e.g. Germany).



Unlike this question, I don't intend to move to another country without my passport. For example, I just go from a hotel to an office. May I leave my passport at the hotel in this case?










share|improve this question















The new EU-like Turkish ID cards are not valid in the EU countries yet, but I wonder if I need to carry my passport while already in an EU country (e.g. Germany).



Unlike this question, I don't intend to move to another country without my passport. For example, I just go from a hotel to an office. May I leave my passport at the hotel in this case?







germany eu identity-cards turkish-citizens






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 6 '17 at 11:02

























asked Nov 6 '17 at 10:49









ahmedus

2,43241644




2,43241644







  • 2




    That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 6 '17 at 10:58






  • 4




    I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:04






  • 4




    @ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:11







  • 4




    @emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
    – phoog
    Nov 6 '17 at 16:36






  • 2




    @emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
    – Michael Kjörling
    Nov 6 '17 at 21:10













  • 2




    That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
    – Henning Makholm
    Nov 6 '17 at 10:58






  • 4




    I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:04






  • 4




    @ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
    – Edmund Dantes
    Nov 6 '17 at 11:11







  • 4




    @emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
    – phoog
    Nov 6 '17 at 16:36






  • 2




    @emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
    – Michael Kjörling
    Nov 6 '17 at 21:10








2




2




That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 6 '17 at 10:58




That depends a lot on which EU country you're talking about. This is a matter of national law.
– Henning Makholm
Nov 6 '17 at 10:58




4




4




I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 6 '17 at 11:04




I can't write an answer now, but because you ask if you SHOULD carry and not if you HAVE TO carry, I would say that yes, you should carry a recognized (by the country you're visiting) identification with you at all times. I do that every time I am abroad, even though I am an EU citizen. Especially in times of the migrant crisis in Europe, it is wise to carry proper identification, as it may simplify things when you are asked to confirm your legal status in an EU country.
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 6 '17 at 11:04




4




4




@ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 6 '17 at 11:11





@ahmedus, now that you have mentioned Germany - it makes even more sense :) It is always simpler to carry the document than going to the police station for identification - if you value your time and comfort :)
– Edmund Dantes
Nov 6 '17 at 11:11





4




4




@emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
– phoog
Nov 6 '17 at 16:36




@emory that seems like it might be a way of defining the term free country, but I don't see how it helps to answer this question.
– phoog
Nov 6 '17 at 16:36




2




2




@emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
– Michael Kjörling
Nov 6 '17 at 21:10





@emory Typically, when you are away from the country in which you are a citizen, even legal requirements notwithstanding, it's a good idea to be able to show that you have legally entered the country you're in, and/or that you have the right to be in the country you're in, should you be prompted to do so. Being able to prove your identity and citizenship is a very good start towards this end. This does not imply anything "unfree" about the country you're visiting (whether that visit is for business or pleasure, however you'd define those terms).
– Michael Kjörling
Nov 6 '17 at 21:10











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
32
down vote



accepted










When staying in Germany, you are by law required to be in the possession of a valid and recognized identification document, but not to carry it with you. This applies both to German citizens older than 16 years of age (PAuswG § 1) and to foreigners (AufenthG § 3).



Even if you are not required by law to carry an ID, it can, especially for foreigners, save you a lot of hassle. Unlike in many other countries, German police are, in many situations without any specific reason or suspicion, entitled to stop you and request and verify your personal data. In practice, this means that the police are entitled to detain you until they can verify that you are whoever you claim to be, if you are not carrying any ID documents. Foreigners can also be detained until the police can verify that you are legally present in Germany.



Having lived as a foreigner in Germany for many years and being in a similar situation as you are (not having a recognized national ID card, I ought to carry my passport), the practical consequences depend on whoever you are confronted with. In most situations, the police have been satisfied seeing a driver's licence, although they by no means are obligated to recognize that as an ID document. I have also a few times been detained for shorter periods.






share|improve this answer






















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – JonathanReez♦
    Nov 10 '17 at 0:15

















up vote
6
down vote













As a Tourist



I'd probably take the passport with me.



As a Resident Alien



I'd handle it much as German nationals do with their Personalausweis. If you're in your hometown and not engaged in any activity that might be misconstrued, you can leave your ID at home. Police actually do need a reason to ask "Papers, please!" but this reason could be that you're witness to a traffic accident or that you look like someone they are searching for.



  • If you are running through a park early in the morning, odds are very low that you will be asked for papers, and it will not be suspicious that you don't have them. Especially if you can answer in fluent German where you live and this information checks out against the databases of the Bürgeramt.

  • If you are slowly strolling through a park known for drug dealing in the evening, better bring your papers with you.

  • If you are operating a motor vehicle, take both the license and the ID papers.

  • If you are traveling to another city, take the papers along.

Non-Official Purposes



If you go to the post office to collect a parcel, or to a rental company to rent a car, you will know that you'll need ID. Bring it ...






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
    – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
    Nov 6 '17 at 23:13











  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:03










  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:53










  • I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 7 '17 at 10:18










  • As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
    – simbabque
    Nov 7 '17 at 15:37

















up vote
5
down vote













tl;dr In lack of a valid ID, take your passport with you.



There are a few misconceptions in other answers or comments (though Tor-Einar Jarnbjo got it basically right).



You are required to own a valid ID (or passport and Visa, and other things, it depends) to enter Germany as a foreigner. You are also required to own a valid ID, alternatively a passport if you are German and over 16 years of age (and not infirm and permanently hospitalized). Mind the wording, valid.



A (valid) passport qualifies as valid ID, a driver's license (or anything else, including your library card) does not. Though some non-officials may accept a driver's license anyway.



Note that "valid" also applies to expired or expiring IDs. Be sure your passport doesn't expire. Failure to possess a valid ID is subject to a fee up to 3,000 Euros, and it is up to the officer to decide whether and what amount of fine you pay (nope, that's no joke). I've once paid 200 Euros because my ID expired two days before my being-renewed ID was ready, and my passport had expired some weeks earlier, too.

Which is just kafkaesque because the officer only noticed my old ID had expired two days earlier when I went to get my new, valid, ID. Which had been ordered some weeks earlier showing a then-valid ID, and which was, of course, perfectly valid now, and there was never at any time any doubt whatsoever on my identity.



That being said, you are not required to carry an ID at all times, but you are required to present it to authorities who are entitled to control ID when they ask you to, and you must allow them to verify your face matches the photograph (so, no burkha or such).

Authorities, that includes police. Contrary to popular belief, police does not really need a reason to ask you for your ID. Well, they do, but them thinking you're suspect in some way is enough of a reason. So, while they cannot cannot just indiscriminately ask everybody passing by in the street to present an ID (other than in exceptional situations), they can very well ask you, because you look suspect to them.



Which basically means you should carry an ID anyway, or you may be detained or accompanied to your residence to get your ID.



Update:

Upon re-reading the law again because of a comment below, I noticed a pecularity which suggests that being detained is not the worst that can happen. It seems that in the most perverse sense of the wording of the law, even if you generally own a valid ID, it is still possible that you can be fined those 3,000 Euros.
First, the law literally says "besitzen" (possess) although "eignen" or "zu eigen haben" (own) would, albeit old fashioned and not common language, probably be the accurate wording.

The difference is that "besitzen" implies exercising control, but not necessarily owning something. A thief who steals your car "possesses" the car, while you "own" it. I'm not sure whether this translates well to English, and if the meaning is analogous.



That may, of course, be a mere inaccuracy, and not intentional. In the most perverse sense, it would mean that if I steal your ID (so I possess it), then you are breaking the law, and I'm perfectly good. So that looks like an unintentional mistake. This cannot be the law's intent.

But note that the paragraph about fines states: "... in violation of paragraph 1 [...] does not, or does not in time, present an ID".

Wow, wait a moment! In time? What does "in time" mean? Who decides what is "in time" and what isn't? Well, guess who, the official you deal with does, as he likes. See where this is going? You should really have the ID with you, or not too far away, anyway. It's best not to tempt your luck.

/Update



The remark in a comment above about not inviting Police into your home is correct, and not correct. Police will not normally search your stuff and isn't entitled to do so. They're not even entitled to look into the trunk of your car, except if you open it and thus they can obviously look inside (though they may, and will, ask to inspect the first-aid kit, which most people keep in the trunk).

However, they are required by the law to pursue anything illegal they see, and to follow every reasonable, justifiable suspicion of a crime, so it's nevertheless a very bad idea to let them into your home. You never know what illegal things you might own. No seriously, you don't know. I cannot even tell whether I broke the law recently because laws are so perverse nowadays.



You are not required to hand your ID or deposit it with someone or anyone (except authorities entitled to control or withdraw ID, which again includes police), and in fact it is illegal for someone to ask you to give up custody of your ID in any way, except for said authorities. So, strictly speaking, what the Post does regularly when you fetch a parcel, or what many hotels do is illegal (since, once your ID is on the other side of the bulletproof counter window, it's very much no longer in your custody).

Regarding a below comment, it is not truly illegal for e.g. a hotel to copy an ID. Paragraph 20 explicitly permits the owner or someone else with the owner's explicit consent to make a copy provided that the copy is clearly identifiable as copy. They may, however, not give the copy to a third party and they may not use any of the data on the ID card, except if the owner explicitly agreed (that may be one reason why hotels make you fill out forms with "data that they already know" such as the name, date of birth, and address as written on the ID card).



You may also be asked for an ID when travelling on the train since a month or two (my wife had this happen recently). Used to be the credit card you bought the (personalized) ticket with or your Bahncard (if you have one) was enough as identification, used to be you needed none at all, but now they seem to insist on an ID. Though I'm not sure what would be the consequence if you refused to show one. After all, you have a ticket either way, and technically the conductor is not entitled to ask for ID. But if you prefer a calm stay, you should probably not try it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4




    You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
    – Chris
    Nov 6 '17 at 22:42






  • 1




    The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:10






  • 4




    You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:56










  • @Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
    – Martin Schröder
    Nov 7 '17 at 8:54










  • @MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 9:04










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104902%2fshould-a-non-eu-citizen-always-carry-his-her-passport-in-germany%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
32
down vote



accepted










When staying in Germany, you are by law required to be in the possession of a valid and recognized identification document, but not to carry it with you. This applies both to German citizens older than 16 years of age (PAuswG § 1) and to foreigners (AufenthG § 3).



Even if you are not required by law to carry an ID, it can, especially for foreigners, save you a lot of hassle. Unlike in many other countries, German police are, in many situations without any specific reason or suspicion, entitled to stop you and request and verify your personal data. In practice, this means that the police are entitled to detain you until they can verify that you are whoever you claim to be, if you are not carrying any ID documents. Foreigners can also be detained until the police can verify that you are legally present in Germany.



Having lived as a foreigner in Germany for many years and being in a similar situation as you are (not having a recognized national ID card, I ought to carry my passport), the practical consequences depend on whoever you are confronted with. In most situations, the police have been satisfied seeing a driver's licence, although they by no means are obligated to recognize that as an ID document. I have also a few times been detained for shorter periods.






share|improve this answer






















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – JonathanReez♦
    Nov 10 '17 at 0:15














up vote
32
down vote



accepted










When staying in Germany, you are by law required to be in the possession of a valid and recognized identification document, but not to carry it with you. This applies both to German citizens older than 16 years of age (PAuswG § 1) and to foreigners (AufenthG § 3).



Even if you are not required by law to carry an ID, it can, especially for foreigners, save you a lot of hassle. Unlike in many other countries, German police are, in many situations without any specific reason or suspicion, entitled to stop you and request and verify your personal data. In practice, this means that the police are entitled to detain you until they can verify that you are whoever you claim to be, if you are not carrying any ID documents. Foreigners can also be detained until the police can verify that you are legally present in Germany.



Having lived as a foreigner in Germany for many years and being in a similar situation as you are (not having a recognized national ID card, I ought to carry my passport), the practical consequences depend on whoever you are confronted with. In most situations, the police have been satisfied seeing a driver's licence, although they by no means are obligated to recognize that as an ID document. I have also a few times been detained for shorter periods.






share|improve this answer






















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – JonathanReez♦
    Nov 10 '17 at 0:15












up vote
32
down vote



accepted







up vote
32
down vote



accepted






When staying in Germany, you are by law required to be in the possession of a valid and recognized identification document, but not to carry it with you. This applies both to German citizens older than 16 years of age (PAuswG § 1) and to foreigners (AufenthG § 3).



Even if you are not required by law to carry an ID, it can, especially for foreigners, save you a lot of hassle. Unlike in many other countries, German police are, in many situations without any specific reason or suspicion, entitled to stop you and request and verify your personal data. In practice, this means that the police are entitled to detain you until they can verify that you are whoever you claim to be, if you are not carrying any ID documents. Foreigners can also be detained until the police can verify that you are legally present in Germany.



Having lived as a foreigner in Germany for many years and being in a similar situation as you are (not having a recognized national ID card, I ought to carry my passport), the practical consequences depend on whoever you are confronted with. In most situations, the police have been satisfied seeing a driver's licence, although they by no means are obligated to recognize that as an ID document. I have also a few times been detained for shorter periods.






share|improve this answer














When staying in Germany, you are by law required to be in the possession of a valid and recognized identification document, but not to carry it with you. This applies both to German citizens older than 16 years of age (PAuswG § 1) and to foreigners (AufenthG § 3).



Even if you are not required by law to carry an ID, it can, especially for foreigners, save you a lot of hassle. Unlike in many other countries, German police are, in many situations without any specific reason or suspicion, entitled to stop you and request and verify your personal data. In practice, this means that the police are entitled to detain you until they can verify that you are whoever you claim to be, if you are not carrying any ID documents. Foreigners can also be detained until the police can verify that you are legally present in Germany.



Having lived as a foreigner in Germany for many years and being in a similar situation as you are (not having a recognized national ID card, I ought to carry my passport), the practical consequences depend on whoever you are confronted with. In most situations, the police have been satisfied seeing a driver's licence, although they by no means are obligated to recognize that as an ID document. I have also a few times been detained for shorter periods.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 6 '17 at 15:50









T.J.L.

1135




1135










answered Nov 6 '17 at 11:38









Tor-Einar Jarnbjo

28.3k270107




28.3k270107











  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – JonathanReez♦
    Nov 10 '17 at 0:15
















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – JonathanReez♦
    Nov 10 '17 at 0:15















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– JonathanReez♦
Nov 10 '17 at 0:15




Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– JonathanReez♦
Nov 10 '17 at 0:15












up vote
6
down vote













As a Tourist



I'd probably take the passport with me.



As a Resident Alien



I'd handle it much as German nationals do with their Personalausweis. If you're in your hometown and not engaged in any activity that might be misconstrued, you can leave your ID at home. Police actually do need a reason to ask "Papers, please!" but this reason could be that you're witness to a traffic accident or that you look like someone they are searching for.



  • If you are running through a park early in the morning, odds are very low that you will be asked for papers, and it will not be suspicious that you don't have them. Especially if you can answer in fluent German where you live and this information checks out against the databases of the Bürgeramt.

  • If you are slowly strolling through a park known for drug dealing in the evening, better bring your papers with you.

  • If you are operating a motor vehicle, take both the license and the ID papers.

  • If you are traveling to another city, take the papers along.

Non-Official Purposes



If you go to the post office to collect a parcel, or to a rental company to rent a car, you will know that you'll need ID. Bring it ...






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
    – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
    Nov 6 '17 at 23:13











  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:03










  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:53










  • I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 7 '17 at 10:18










  • As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
    – simbabque
    Nov 7 '17 at 15:37














up vote
6
down vote













As a Tourist



I'd probably take the passport with me.



As a Resident Alien



I'd handle it much as German nationals do with their Personalausweis. If you're in your hometown and not engaged in any activity that might be misconstrued, you can leave your ID at home. Police actually do need a reason to ask "Papers, please!" but this reason could be that you're witness to a traffic accident or that you look like someone they are searching for.



  • If you are running through a park early in the morning, odds are very low that you will be asked for papers, and it will not be suspicious that you don't have them. Especially if you can answer in fluent German where you live and this information checks out against the databases of the Bürgeramt.

  • If you are slowly strolling through a park known for drug dealing in the evening, better bring your papers with you.

  • If you are operating a motor vehicle, take both the license and the ID papers.

  • If you are traveling to another city, take the papers along.

Non-Official Purposes



If you go to the post office to collect a parcel, or to a rental company to rent a car, you will know that you'll need ID. Bring it ...






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
    – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
    Nov 6 '17 at 23:13











  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:03










  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:53










  • I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 7 '17 at 10:18










  • As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
    – simbabque
    Nov 7 '17 at 15:37












up vote
6
down vote










up vote
6
down vote









As a Tourist



I'd probably take the passport with me.



As a Resident Alien



I'd handle it much as German nationals do with their Personalausweis. If you're in your hometown and not engaged in any activity that might be misconstrued, you can leave your ID at home. Police actually do need a reason to ask "Papers, please!" but this reason could be that you're witness to a traffic accident or that you look like someone they are searching for.



  • If you are running through a park early in the morning, odds are very low that you will be asked for papers, and it will not be suspicious that you don't have them. Especially if you can answer in fluent German where you live and this information checks out against the databases of the Bürgeramt.

  • If you are slowly strolling through a park known for drug dealing in the evening, better bring your papers with you.

  • If you are operating a motor vehicle, take both the license and the ID papers.

  • If you are traveling to another city, take the papers along.

Non-Official Purposes



If you go to the post office to collect a parcel, or to a rental company to rent a car, you will know that you'll need ID. Bring it ...






share|improve this answer














As a Tourist



I'd probably take the passport with me.



As a Resident Alien



I'd handle it much as German nationals do with their Personalausweis. If you're in your hometown and not engaged in any activity that might be misconstrued, you can leave your ID at home. Police actually do need a reason to ask "Papers, please!" but this reason could be that you're witness to a traffic accident or that you look like someone they are searching for.



  • If you are running through a park early in the morning, odds are very low that you will be asked for papers, and it will not be suspicious that you don't have them. Especially if you can answer in fluent German where you live and this information checks out against the databases of the Bürgeramt.

  • If you are slowly strolling through a park known for drug dealing in the evening, better bring your papers with you.

  • If you are operating a motor vehicle, take both the license and the ID papers.

  • If you are traveling to another city, take the papers along.

Non-Official Purposes



If you go to the post office to collect a parcel, or to a rental company to rent a car, you will know that you'll need ID. Bring it ...







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 6 '17 at 18:11

























answered Nov 6 '17 at 17:25









o.m.

20.3k23152




20.3k23152







  • 2




    In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
    – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
    Nov 6 '17 at 23:13











  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:03










  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:53










  • I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 7 '17 at 10:18










  • As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
    – simbabque
    Nov 7 '17 at 15:37












  • 2




    In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
    – Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
    Nov 6 '17 at 23:13











  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:03










  • @Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:53










  • I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
    – Martin Bonner
    Nov 7 '17 at 10:18










  • As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
    – simbabque
    Nov 7 '17 at 15:37







2




2




In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
Nov 6 '17 at 23:13





In Germany, police law is state (Bundesland) matter and details and practice differ from state to state, but the requirements for a 'reason' to require an arbitrary person to identify himself are so vague, that the police in practice can and do invent anything to have a legally sound justification. In most states, simply being present at or near a location where a higher crime level can be assumed is also enough to justify an identity check and in some cases even a search.
– Tor-Einar Jarnbjo
Nov 6 '17 at 23:13













@Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 1:03




@Tor-EinarJarnbjo And in Bavaria, I have also had them upfront claiming »verdachtsunabhängige Personenkontrolle« (identity check not tied to any suspicion). Whether or not any factors such as my long hair contributed to their decision I cannot know.
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 1:03












@Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
– o.m.
Nov 7 '17 at 5:53




@Tor-EinarJarnbjo, in most states it might have to be an "officially designated" high crime problem area for a search without reason. But the cops can always claim they had seen furtive movements like stashing drugs. You can try and sue them afterwards, and you might get vindicated a few years later, but that's probably not worth the hassle.
– o.m.
Nov 7 '17 at 5:53












I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
– Martin Bonner
Nov 7 '17 at 10:18




I've never needed ID to collect a parcel from the post office ... but that could be because I live in a village of about 1000 people, and there just aren't that many people with a strong English accent.
– Martin Bonner
Nov 7 '17 at 10:18












As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
– simbabque
Nov 7 '17 at 15:37




As a resident alien you also need to consider your visa. For example, an Aufenthaltstitel under §19a (blue card) that is an actual Personalausweis-like card is only valid in conjunction with the passport. In this case, the Auslaenderbehoerde Berlin claims you always need to carry both documents at all times, although that is not required by law.
– simbabque
Nov 7 '17 at 15:37










up vote
5
down vote













tl;dr In lack of a valid ID, take your passport with you.



There are a few misconceptions in other answers or comments (though Tor-Einar Jarnbjo got it basically right).



You are required to own a valid ID (or passport and Visa, and other things, it depends) to enter Germany as a foreigner. You are also required to own a valid ID, alternatively a passport if you are German and over 16 years of age (and not infirm and permanently hospitalized). Mind the wording, valid.



A (valid) passport qualifies as valid ID, a driver's license (or anything else, including your library card) does not. Though some non-officials may accept a driver's license anyway.



Note that "valid" also applies to expired or expiring IDs. Be sure your passport doesn't expire. Failure to possess a valid ID is subject to a fee up to 3,000 Euros, and it is up to the officer to decide whether and what amount of fine you pay (nope, that's no joke). I've once paid 200 Euros because my ID expired two days before my being-renewed ID was ready, and my passport had expired some weeks earlier, too.

Which is just kafkaesque because the officer only noticed my old ID had expired two days earlier when I went to get my new, valid, ID. Which had been ordered some weeks earlier showing a then-valid ID, and which was, of course, perfectly valid now, and there was never at any time any doubt whatsoever on my identity.



That being said, you are not required to carry an ID at all times, but you are required to present it to authorities who are entitled to control ID when they ask you to, and you must allow them to verify your face matches the photograph (so, no burkha or such).

Authorities, that includes police. Contrary to popular belief, police does not really need a reason to ask you for your ID. Well, they do, but them thinking you're suspect in some way is enough of a reason. So, while they cannot cannot just indiscriminately ask everybody passing by in the street to present an ID (other than in exceptional situations), they can very well ask you, because you look suspect to them.



Which basically means you should carry an ID anyway, or you may be detained or accompanied to your residence to get your ID.



Update:

Upon re-reading the law again because of a comment below, I noticed a pecularity which suggests that being detained is not the worst that can happen. It seems that in the most perverse sense of the wording of the law, even if you generally own a valid ID, it is still possible that you can be fined those 3,000 Euros.
First, the law literally says "besitzen" (possess) although "eignen" or "zu eigen haben" (own) would, albeit old fashioned and not common language, probably be the accurate wording.

The difference is that "besitzen" implies exercising control, but not necessarily owning something. A thief who steals your car "possesses" the car, while you "own" it. I'm not sure whether this translates well to English, and if the meaning is analogous.



That may, of course, be a mere inaccuracy, and not intentional. In the most perverse sense, it would mean that if I steal your ID (so I possess it), then you are breaking the law, and I'm perfectly good. So that looks like an unintentional mistake. This cannot be the law's intent.

But note that the paragraph about fines states: "... in violation of paragraph 1 [...] does not, or does not in time, present an ID".

Wow, wait a moment! In time? What does "in time" mean? Who decides what is "in time" and what isn't? Well, guess who, the official you deal with does, as he likes. See where this is going? You should really have the ID with you, or not too far away, anyway. It's best not to tempt your luck.

/Update



The remark in a comment above about not inviting Police into your home is correct, and not correct. Police will not normally search your stuff and isn't entitled to do so. They're not even entitled to look into the trunk of your car, except if you open it and thus they can obviously look inside (though they may, and will, ask to inspect the first-aid kit, which most people keep in the trunk).

However, they are required by the law to pursue anything illegal they see, and to follow every reasonable, justifiable suspicion of a crime, so it's nevertheless a very bad idea to let them into your home. You never know what illegal things you might own. No seriously, you don't know. I cannot even tell whether I broke the law recently because laws are so perverse nowadays.



You are not required to hand your ID or deposit it with someone or anyone (except authorities entitled to control or withdraw ID, which again includes police), and in fact it is illegal for someone to ask you to give up custody of your ID in any way, except for said authorities. So, strictly speaking, what the Post does regularly when you fetch a parcel, or what many hotels do is illegal (since, once your ID is on the other side of the bulletproof counter window, it's very much no longer in your custody).

Regarding a below comment, it is not truly illegal for e.g. a hotel to copy an ID. Paragraph 20 explicitly permits the owner or someone else with the owner's explicit consent to make a copy provided that the copy is clearly identifiable as copy. They may, however, not give the copy to a third party and they may not use any of the data on the ID card, except if the owner explicitly agreed (that may be one reason why hotels make you fill out forms with "data that they already know" such as the name, date of birth, and address as written on the ID card).



You may also be asked for an ID when travelling on the train since a month or two (my wife had this happen recently). Used to be the credit card you bought the (personalized) ticket with or your Bahncard (if you have one) was enough as identification, used to be you needed none at all, but now they seem to insist on an ID. Though I'm not sure what would be the consequence if you refused to show one. After all, you have a ticket either way, and technically the conductor is not entitled to ask for ID. But if you prefer a calm stay, you should probably not try it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4




    You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
    – Chris
    Nov 6 '17 at 22:42






  • 1




    The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:10






  • 4




    You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:56










  • @Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
    – Martin Schröder
    Nov 7 '17 at 8:54










  • @MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 9:04














up vote
5
down vote













tl;dr In lack of a valid ID, take your passport with you.



There are a few misconceptions in other answers or comments (though Tor-Einar Jarnbjo got it basically right).



You are required to own a valid ID (or passport and Visa, and other things, it depends) to enter Germany as a foreigner. You are also required to own a valid ID, alternatively a passport if you are German and over 16 years of age (and not infirm and permanently hospitalized). Mind the wording, valid.



A (valid) passport qualifies as valid ID, a driver's license (or anything else, including your library card) does not. Though some non-officials may accept a driver's license anyway.



Note that "valid" also applies to expired or expiring IDs. Be sure your passport doesn't expire. Failure to possess a valid ID is subject to a fee up to 3,000 Euros, and it is up to the officer to decide whether and what amount of fine you pay (nope, that's no joke). I've once paid 200 Euros because my ID expired two days before my being-renewed ID was ready, and my passport had expired some weeks earlier, too.

Which is just kafkaesque because the officer only noticed my old ID had expired two days earlier when I went to get my new, valid, ID. Which had been ordered some weeks earlier showing a then-valid ID, and which was, of course, perfectly valid now, and there was never at any time any doubt whatsoever on my identity.



That being said, you are not required to carry an ID at all times, but you are required to present it to authorities who are entitled to control ID when they ask you to, and you must allow them to verify your face matches the photograph (so, no burkha or such).

Authorities, that includes police. Contrary to popular belief, police does not really need a reason to ask you for your ID. Well, they do, but them thinking you're suspect in some way is enough of a reason. So, while they cannot cannot just indiscriminately ask everybody passing by in the street to present an ID (other than in exceptional situations), they can very well ask you, because you look suspect to them.



Which basically means you should carry an ID anyway, or you may be detained or accompanied to your residence to get your ID.



Update:

Upon re-reading the law again because of a comment below, I noticed a pecularity which suggests that being detained is not the worst that can happen. It seems that in the most perverse sense of the wording of the law, even if you generally own a valid ID, it is still possible that you can be fined those 3,000 Euros.
First, the law literally says "besitzen" (possess) although "eignen" or "zu eigen haben" (own) would, albeit old fashioned and not common language, probably be the accurate wording.

The difference is that "besitzen" implies exercising control, but not necessarily owning something. A thief who steals your car "possesses" the car, while you "own" it. I'm not sure whether this translates well to English, and if the meaning is analogous.



That may, of course, be a mere inaccuracy, and not intentional. In the most perverse sense, it would mean that if I steal your ID (so I possess it), then you are breaking the law, and I'm perfectly good. So that looks like an unintentional mistake. This cannot be the law's intent.

But note that the paragraph about fines states: "... in violation of paragraph 1 [...] does not, or does not in time, present an ID".

Wow, wait a moment! In time? What does "in time" mean? Who decides what is "in time" and what isn't? Well, guess who, the official you deal with does, as he likes. See where this is going? You should really have the ID with you, or not too far away, anyway. It's best not to tempt your luck.

/Update



The remark in a comment above about not inviting Police into your home is correct, and not correct. Police will not normally search your stuff and isn't entitled to do so. They're not even entitled to look into the trunk of your car, except if you open it and thus they can obviously look inside (though they may, and will, ask to inspect the first-aid kit, which most people keep in the trunk).

However, they are required by the law to pursue anything illegal they see, and to follow every reasonable, justifiable suspicion of a crime, so it's nevertheless a very bad idea to let them into your home. You never know what illegal things you might own. No seriously, you don't know. I cannot even tell whether I broke the law recently because laws are so perverse nowadays.



You are not required to hand your ID or deposit it with someone or anyone (except authorities entitled to control or withdraw ID, which again includes police), and in fact it is illegal for someone to ask you to give up custody of your ID in any way, except for said authorities. So, strictly speaking, what the Post does regularly when you fetch a parcel, or what many hotels do is illegal (since, once your ID is on the other side of the bulletproof counter window, it's very much no longer in your custody).

Regarding a below comment, it is not truly illegal for e.g. a hotel to copy an ID. Paragraph 20 explicitly permits the owner or someone else with the owner's explicit consent to make a copy provided that the copy is clearly identifiable as copy. They may, however, not give the copy to a third party and they may not use any of the data on the ID card, except if the owner explicitly agreed (that may be one reason why hotels make you fill out forms with "data that they already know" such as the name, date of birth, and address as written on the ID card).



You may also be asked for an ID when travelling on the train since a month or two (my wife had this happen recently). Used to be the credit card you bought the (personalized) ticket with or your Bahncard (if you have one) was enough as identification, used to be you needed none at all, but now they seem to insist on an ID. Though I'm not sure what would be the consequence if you refused to show one. After all, you have a ticket either way, and technically the conductor is not entitled to ask for ID. But if you prefer a calm stay, you should probably not try it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4




    You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
    – Chris
    Nov 6 '17 at 22:42






  • 1




    The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:10






  • 4




    You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:56










  • @Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
    – Martin Schröder
    Nov 7 '17 at 8:54










  • @MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 9:04












up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









tl;dr In lack of a valid ID, take your passport with you.



There are a few misconceptions in other answers or comments (though Tor-Einar Jarnbjo got it basically right).



You are required to own a valid ID (or passport and Visa, and other things, it depends) to enter Germany as a foreigner. You are also required to own a valid ID, alternatively a passport if you are German and over 16 years of age (and not infirm and permanently hospitalized). Mind the wording, valid.



A (valid) passport qualifies as valid ID, a driver's license (or anything else, including your library card) does not. Though some non-officials may accept a driver's license anyway.



Note that "valid" also applies to expired or expiring IDs. Be sure your passport doesn't expire. Failure to possess a valid ID is subject to a fee up to 3,000 Euros, and it is up to the officer to decide whether and what amount of fine you pay (nope, that's no joke). I've once paid 200 Euros because my ID expired two days before my being-renewed ID was ready, and my passport had expired some weeks earlier, too.

Which is just kafkaesque because the officer only noticed my old ID had expired two days earlier when I went to get my new, valid, ID. Which had been ordered some weeks earlier showing a then-valid ID, and which was, of course, perfectly valid now, and there was never at any time any doubt whatsoever on my identity.



That being said, you are not required to carry an ID at all times, but you are required to present it to authorities who are entitled to control ID when they ask you to, and you must allow them to verify your face matches the photograph (so, no burkha or such).

Authorities, that includes police. Contrary to popular belief, police does not really need a reason to ask you for your ID. Well, they do, but them thinking you're suspect in some way is enough of a reason. So, while they cannot cannot just indiscriminately ask everybody passing by in the street to present an ID (other than in exceptional situations), they can very well ask you, because you look suspect to them.



Which basically means you should carry an ID anyway, or you may be detained or accompanied to your residence to get your ID.



Update:

Upon re-reading the law again because of a comment below, I noticed a pecularity which suggests that being detained is not the worst that can happen. It seems that in the most perverse sense of the wording of the law, even if you generally own a valid ID, it is still possible that you can be fined those 3,000 Euros.
First, the law literally says "besitzen" (possess) although "eignen" or "zu eigen haben" (own) would, albeit old fashioned and not common language, probably be the accurate wording.

The difference is that "besitzen" implies exercising control, but not necessarily owning something. A thief who steals your car "possesses" the car, while you "own" it. I'm not sure whether this translates well to English, and if the meaning is analogous.



That may, of course, be a mere inaccuracy, and not intentional. In the most perverse sense, it would mean that if I steal your ID (so I possess it), then you are breaking the law, and I'm perfectly good. So that looks like an unintentional mistake. This cannot be the law's intent.

But note that the paragraph about fines states: "... in violation of paragraph 1 [...] does not, or does not in time, present an ID".

Wow, wait a moment! In time? What does "in time" mean? Who decides what is "in time" and what isn't? Well, guess who, the official you deal with does, as he likes. See where this is going? You should really have the ID with you, or not too far away, anyway. It's best not to tempt your luck.

/Update



The remark in a comment above about not inviting Police into your home is correct, and not correct. Police will not normally search your stuff and isn't entitled to do so. They're not even entitled to look into the trunk of your car, except if you open it and thus they can obviously look inside (though they may, and will, ask to inspect the first-aid kit, which most people keep in the trunk).

However, they are required by the law to pursue anything illegal they see, and to follow every reasonable, justifiable suspicion of a crime, so it's nevertheless a very bad idea to let them into your home. You never know what illegal things you might own. No seriously, you don't know. I cannot even tell whether I broke the law recently because laws are so perverse nowadays.



You are not required to hand your ID or deposit it with someone or anyone (except authorities entitled to control or withdraw ID, which again includes police), and in fact it is illegal for someone to ask you to give up custody of your ID in any way, except for said authorities. So, strictly speaking, what the Post does regularly when you fetch a parcel, or what many hotels do is illegal (since, once your ID is on the other side of the bulletproof counter window, it's very much no longer in your custody).

Regarding a below comment, it is not truly illegal for e.g. a hotel to copy an ID. Paragraph 20 explicitly permits the owner or someone else with the owner's explicit consent to make a copy provided that the copy is clearly identifiable as copy. They may, however, not give the copy to a third party and they may not use any of the data on the ID card, except if the owner explicitly agreed (that may be one reason why hotels make you fill out forms with "data that they already know" such as the name, date of birth, and address as written on the ID card).



You may also be asked for an ID when travelling on the train since a month or two (my wife had this happen recently). Used to be the credit card you bought the (personalized) ticket with or your Bahncard (if you have one) was enough as identification, used to be you needed none at all, but now they seem to insist on an ID. Though I'm not sure what would be the consequence if you refused to show one. After all, you have a ticket either way, and technically the conductor is not entitled to ask for ID. But if you prefer a calm stay, you should probably not try it.






share|improve this answer














tl;dr In lack of a valid ID, take your passport with you.



There are a few misconceptions in other answers or comments (though Tor-Einar Jarnbjo got it basically right).



You are required to own a valid ID (or passport and Visa, and other things, it depends) to enter Germany as a foreigner. You are also required to own a valid ID, alternatively a passport if you are German and over 16 years of age (and not infirm and permanently hospitalized). Mind the wording, valid.



A (valid) passport qualifies as valid ID, a driver's license (or anything else, including your library card) does not. Though some non-officials may accept a driver's license anyway.



Note that "valid" also applies to expired or expiring IDs. Be sure your passport doesn't expire. Failure to possess a valid ID is subject to a fee up to 3,000 Euros, and it is up to the officer to decide whether and what amount of fine you pay (nope, that's no joke). I've once paid 200 Euros because my ID expired two days before my being-renewed ID was ready, and my passport had expired some weeks earlier, too.

Which is just kafkaesque because the officer only noticed my old ID had expired two days earlier when I went to get my new, valid, ID. Which had been ordered some weeks earlier showing a then-valid ID, and which was, of course, perfectly valid now, and there was never at any time any doubt whatsoever on my identity.



That being said, you are not required to carry an ID at all times, but you are required to present it to authorities who are entitled to control ID when they ask you to, and you must allow them to verify your face matches the photograph (so, no burkha or such).

Authorities, that includes police. Contrary to popular belief, police does not really need a reason to ask you for your ID. Well, they do, but them thinking you're suspect in some way is enough of a reason. So, while they cannot cannot just indiscriminately ask everybody passing by in the street to present an ID (other than in exceptional situations), they can very well ask you, because you look suspect to them.



Which basically means you should carry an ID anyway, or you may be detained or accompanied to your residence to get your ID.



Update:

Upon re-reading the law again because of a comment below, I noticed a pecularity which suggests that being detained is not the worst that can happen. It seems that in the most perverse sense of the wording of the law, even if you generally own a valid ID, it is still possible that you can be fined those 3,000 Euros.
First, the law literally says "besitzen" (possess) although "eignen" or "zu eigen haben" (own) would, albeit old fashioned and not common language, probably be the accurate wording.

The difference is that "besitzen" implies exercising control, but not necessarily owning something. A thief who steals your car "possesses" the car, while you "own" it. I'm not sure whether this translates well to English, and if the meaning is analogous.



That may, of course, be a mere inaccuracy, and not intentional. In the most perverse sense, it would mean that if I steal your ID (so I possess it), then you are breaking the law, and I'm perfectly good. So that looks like an unintentional mistake. This cannot be the law's intent.

But note that the paragraph about fines states: "... in violation of paragraph 1 [...] does not, or does not in time, present an ID".

Wow, wait a moment! In time? What does "in time" mean? Who decides what is "in time" and what isn't? Well, guess who, the official you deal with does, as he likes. See where this is going? You should really have the ID with you, or not too far away, anyway. It's best not to tempt your luck.

/Update



The remark in a comment above about not inviting Police into your home is correct, and not correct. Police will not normally search your stuff and isn't entitled to do so. They're not even entitled to look into the trunk of your car, except if you open it and thus they can obviously look inside (though they may, and will, ask to inspect the first-aid kit, which most people keep in the trunk).

However, they are required by the law to pursue anything illegal they see, and to follow every reasonable, justifiable suspicion of a crime, so it's nevertheless a very bad idea to let them into your home. You never know what illegal things you might own. No seriously, you don't know. I cannot even tell whether I broke the law recently because laws are so perverse nowadays.



You are not required to hand your ID or deposit it with someone or anyone (except authorities entitled to control or withdraw ID, which again includes police), and in fact it is illegal for someone to ask you to give up custody of your ID in any way, except for said authorities. So, strictly speaking, what the Post does regularly when you fetch a parcel, or what many hotels do is illegal (since, once your ID is on the other side of the bulletproof counter window, it's very much no longer in your custody).

Regarding a below comment, it is not truly illegal for e.g. a hotel to copy an ID. Paragraph 20 explicitly permits the owner or someone else with the owner's explicit consent to make a copy provided that the copy is clearly identifiable as copy. They may, however, not give the copy to a third party and they may not use any of the data on the ID card, except if the owner explicitly agreed (that may be one reason why hotels make you fill out forms with "data that they already know" such as the name, date of birth, and address as written on the ID card).



You may also be asked for an ID when travelling on the train since a month or two (my wife had this happen recently). Used to be the credit card you bought the (personalized) ticket with or your Bahncard (if you have one) was enough as identification, used to be you needed none at all, but now they seem to insist on an ID. Though I'm not sure what would be the consequence if you refused to show one. After all, you have a ticket either way, and technically the conductor is not entitled to ask for ID. But if you prefer a calm stay, you should probably not try it.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 7 '17 at 16:27

























answered Nov 6 '17 at 21:58









Damon

2,188614




2,188614







  • 4




    You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
    – Chris
    Nov 6 '17 at 22:42






  • 1




    The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:10






  • 4




    You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:56










  • @Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
    – Martin Schröder
    Nov 7 '17 at 8:54










  • @MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 9:04












  • 4




    You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
    – Chris
    Nov 6 '17 at 22:42






  • 1




    The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 1:10






  • 4




    You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
    – o.m.
    Nov 7 '17 at 5:56










  • @Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
    – Martin Schröder
    Nov 7 '17 at 8:54










  • @MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
    – Jan
    Nov 7 '17 at 9:04







4




4




You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
– Chris
Nov 6 '17 at 22:42




You'll only be asked for an ID in the train, if you bought a personalized (cheaper) ticket. In that case you have to show your ID or face the same consequence as if you have no ticket.
– Chris
Nov 6 '17 at 22:42




1




1




The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 1:10




The ID to confirm the proof of being the person on the train ticket is at least two years old. You could also enter an ID card as identification document at least five years ago. In practice, the train operating company has home rights within the trains (and stations, if applicable) they own so failing to comply with their demands will allow them to remove you from their train. (Well, they can always but it should not be discriminatory ofc.) I wonder what the legal situation is for tickets that are ‘only valid in combination with a valid passport/ID card’. Maybe I should ask on Law …
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 1:10




4




4




You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
– o.m.
Nov 7 '17 at 5:56




You can buy tickets online and print them at home. Those are personalized. You can also buy group tickets which require you to write the names of the group onto the ticket. Those are also personalized. A generic ticket does not require you to show any sort of ID, as long as it is valid.
– o.m.
Nov 7 '17 at 5:56












@Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
– Martin Schröder
Nov 7 '17 at 8:54




@Jan: I've got a Bahncard and can not remember ever having been asked for an additional ID.
– Martin Schröder
Nov 7 '17 at 8:54












@MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 9:04




@MartinSchröder Technically, the BahnCard 25 is now only valid in connection with an ID card but I too have never been asked for one. BahnCard 50 still includes a photo to the best of my knowledge so it is sufficient for identification.
– Jan
Nov 7 '17 at 9:04

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104902%2fshould-a-non-eu-citizen-always-carry-his-her-passport-in-germany%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest














































































Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)