What is the purpose of UK airside transit visas?









up vote
3
down vote

favorite












RwandAir launched a flight yesterday from Kigali (Rwanda's capital) via Brussels to London Gatwick and then nonstop back to Kigali, all on the same aircraft. The intent behind the intermediate stop in Brussels was to take passengers from Kigali to Brussels, but of course also to take passengers from Brussels back to Kigali via Gatwick, where they would just stay in the aircraft during the 1:30h stopover.



However, RwandAir seemingly didn't consider that citizens of certain countries, Rwanda among others, in many cases need to be in possession of a UK airside transit visa when transiting via the UK (Gatwick in this case), even if they stay on board of the aircraft or in the terminal without passing immigration. Also, all passengers on this flight transiting in Gatwick would have to deboard and undergo security checks in the terminal. Since this is a major inconvenience for passengers originating in Brussels and takes more time than has been scheduled for the stopover, RwandAir has not been allowing passengers to book the flight from Brussels to Kigali.



You can read the whole story here (in French).



I have some questions about this whole issue:



  • Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?

  • How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa? By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks, so the only interaction with authorities which comes to my mind when remaining airside is a security check on your way to your next gate, and even that is not always required. However, at security you typically just present your boarding pass and your passport and the agent checks whether the names match. So at which point would the UK even be controlling your visa? This is an even more interesting question when people actually stay on board of the aircraft and don't interact with anybody at the airport at all.

  • Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?









share|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    RwandAir launched a flight yesterday from Kigali (Rwanda's capital) via Brussels to London Gatwick and then nonstop back to Kigali, all on the same aircraft. The intent behind the intermediate stop in Brussels was to take passengers from Kigali to Brussels, but of course also to take passengers from Brussels back to Kigali via Gatwick, where they would just stay in the aircraft during the 1:30h stopover.



    However, RwandAir seemingly didn't consider that citizens of certain countries, Rwanda among others, in many cases need to be in possession of a UK airside transit visa when transiting via the UK (Gatwick in this case), even if they stay on board of the aircraft or in the terminal without passing immigration. Also, all passengers on this flight transiting in Gatwick would have to deboard and undergo security checks in the terminal. Since this is a major inconvenience for passengers originating in Brussels and takes more time than has been scheduled for the stopover, RwandAir has not been allowing passengers to book the flight from Brussels to Kigali.



    You can read the whole story here (in French).



    I have some questions about this whole issue:



    • Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?

    • How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa? By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks, so the only interaction with authorities which comes to my mind when remaining airside is a security check on your way to your next gate, and even that is not always required. However, at security you typically just present your boarding pass and your passport and the agent checks whether the names match. So at which point would the UK even be controlling your visa? This is an even more interesting question when people actually stay on board of the aircraft and don't interact with anybody at the airport at all.

    • Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?









    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      RwandAir launched a flight yesterday from Kigali (Rwanda's capital) via Brussels to London Gatwick and then nonstop back to Kigali, all on the same aircraft. The intent behind the intermediate stop in Brussels was to take passengers from Kigali to Brussels, but of course also to take passengers from Brussels back to Kigali via Gatwick, where they would just stay in the aircraft during the 1:30h stopover.



      However, RwandAir seemingly didn't consider that citizens of certain countries, Rwanda among others, in many cases need to be in possession of a UK airside transit visa when transiting via the UK (Gatwick in this case), even if they stay on board of the aircraft or in the terminal without passing immigration. Also, all passengers on this flight transiting in Gatwick would have to deboard and undergo security checks in the terminal. Since this is a major inconvenience for passengers originating in Brussels and takes more time than has been scheduled for the stopover, RwandAir has not been allowing passengers to book the flight from Brussels to Kigali.



      You can read the whole story here (in French).



      I have some questions about this whole issue:



      • Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?

      • How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa? By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks, so the only interaction with authorities which comes to my mind when remaining airside is a security check on your way to your next gate, and even that is not always required. However, at security you typically just present your boarding pass and your passport and the agent checks whether the names match. So at which point would the UK even be controlling your visa? This is an even more interesting question when people actually stay on board of the aircraft and don't interact with anybody at the airport at all.

      • Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?









      share|improve this question















      RwandAir launched a flight yesterday from Kigali (Rwanda's capital) via Brussels to London Gatwick and then nonstop back to Kigali, all on the same aircraft. The intent behind the intermediate stop in Brussels was to take passengers from Kigali to Brussels, but of course also to take passengers from Brussels back to Kigali via Gatwick, where they would just stay in the aircraft during the 1:30h stopover.



      However, RwandAir seemingly didn't consider that citizens of certain countries, Rwanda among others, in many cases need to be in possession of a UK airside transit visa when transiting via the UK (Gatwick in this case), even if they stay on board of the aircraft or in the terminal without passing immigration. Also, all passengers on this flight transiting in Gatwick would have to deboard and undergo security checks in the terminal. Since this is a major inconvenience for passengers originating in Brussels and takes more time than has been scheduled for the stopover, RwandAir has not been allowing passengers to book the flight from Brussels to Kigali.



      You can read the whole story here (in French).



      I have some questions about this whole issue:



      • Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?

      • How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa? By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks, so the only interaction with authorities which comes to my mind when remaining airside is a security check on your way to your next gate, and even that is not always required. However, at security you typically just present your boarding pass and your passport and the agent checks whether the names match. So at which point would the UK even be controlling your visa? This is an even more interesting question when people actually stay on board of the aircraft and don't interact with anybody at the airport at all.

      • Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?






      visas uk customs-and-immigration transit transit-visas






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jul 16 '17 at 2:17









      Crazydre

      50.6k990224




      50.6k990224










      asked Jul 15 '17 at 1:58









      Mophotla

      43217




      43217




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          •Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?




          Because if they reach the border and claim asylum, they cannot be removed until their case has been reviewed. However, if they hold onward tickets and documents for their destination, which are the main requirements to get an airside transit visa (henceforth DATV), they are considered less likely to do this.




          •How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa?




          They usually don't; rather it's check-in staff's responsibility. If someone without a DATV turns up at the border without documentation for onward travel or for entering the UK, and claims asylum, the airline can expect hefty fines.




          •Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?




          One reason that I know of is that the UK has different rules for what can be taken onboard an aircraft (in terms of liquids, for example)






          share|improve this answer






















          • "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
            – George Y.
            Jul 15 '17 at 5:22










          • @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
            – Crazydre
            Jul 15 '17 at 6:20







          • 1




            This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
            – Moo
            Jul 15 '17 at 7:50










          • So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
            – Mophotla
            Jul 15 '17 at 21:15






          • 1




            @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
            – Moo
            Jul 16 '17 at 2:43










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "273"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f98113%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-uk-airside-transit-visas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          •Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?




          Because if they reach the border and claim asylum, they cannot be removed until their case has been reviewed. However, if they hold onward tickets and documents for their destination, which are the main requirements to get an airside transit visa (henceforth DATV), they are considered less likely to do this.




          •How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa?




          They usually don't; rather it's check-in staff's responsibility. If someone without a DATV turns up at the border without documentation for onward travel or for entering the UK, and claims asylum, the airline can expect hefty fines.




          •Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?




          One reason that I know of is that the UK has different rules for what can be taken onboard an aircraft (in terms of liquids, for example)






          share|improve this answer






















          • "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
            – George Y.
            Jul 15 '17 at 5:22










          • @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
            – Crazydre
            Jul 15 '17 at 6:20







          • 1




            This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
            – Moo
            Jul 15 '17 at 7:50










          • So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
            – Mophotla
            Jul 15 '17 at 21:15






          • 1




            @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
            – Moo
            Jul 16 '17 at 2:43














          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          •Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?




          Because if they reach the border and claim asylum, they cannot be removed until their case has been reviewed. However, if they hold onward tickets and documents for their destination, which are the main requirements to get an airside transit visa (henceforth DATV), they are considered less likely to do this.




          •How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa?




          They usually don't; rather it's check-in staff's responsibility. If someone without a DATV turns up at the border without documentation for onward travel or for entering the UK, and claims asylum, the airline can expect hefty fines.




          •Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?




          One reason that I know of is that the UK has different rules for what can be taken onboard an aircraft (in terms of liquids, for example)






          share|improve this answer






















          • "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
            – George Y.
            Jul 15 '17 at 5:22










          • @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
            – Crazydre
            Jul 15 '17 at 6:20







          • 1




            This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
            – Moo
            Jul 15 '17 at 7:50










          • So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
            – Mophotla
            Jul 15 '17 at 21:15






          • 1




            @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
            – Moo
            Jul 16 '17 at 2:43












          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          •Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?




          Because if they reach the border and claim asylum, they cannot be removed until their case has been reviewed. However, if they hold onward tickets and documents for their destination, which are the main requirements to get an airside transit visa (henceforth DATV), they are considered less likely to do this.




          •How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa?




          They usually don't; rather it's check-in staff's responsibility. If someone without a DATV turns up at the border without documentation for onward travel or for entering the UK, and claims asylum, the airline can expect hefty fines.




          •Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?




          One reason that I know of is that the UK has different rules for what can be taken onboard an aircraft (in terms of liquids, for example)






          share|improve this answer















          •Why would the UK require certain people to have a visa when transiting airside? These people are guaranteed to never set foot on UK soil, at least for immigration purposes, so why bother about them?




          Because if they reach the border and claim asylum, they cannot be removed until their case has been reviewed. However, if they hold onward tickets and documents for their destination, which are the main requirements to get an airside transit visa (henceforth DATV), they are considered less likely to do this.




          •How does the UK control whether an airside transit passenger is in possession of a visa?




          They usually don't; rather it's check-in staff's responsibility. If someone without a DATV turns up at the border without documentation for onward travel or for entering the UK, and claims asylum, the airline can expect hefty fines.




          •Why does the UK insist on performing security checks on passengers who have already been cleared in Brussels and have stayed in a secure environment (the aircraft) since then?




          One reason that I know of is that the UK has different rules for what can be taken onboard an aircraft (in terms of liquids, for example)







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jul 16 '17 at 5:11

























          answered Jul 15 '17 at 4:26









          Crazydre

          50.6k990224




          50.6k990224











          • "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
            – George Y.
            Jul 15 '17 at 5:22










          • @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
            – Crazydre
            Jul 15 '17 at 6:20







          • 1




            This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
            – Moo
            Jul 15 '17 at 7:50










          • So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
            – Mophotla
            Jul 15 '17 at 21:15






          • 1




            @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
            – Moo
            Jul 16 '17 at 2:43
















          • "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
            – George Y.
            Jul 15 '17 at 5:22










          • @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
            – Crazydre
            Jul 15 '17 at 6:20







          • 1




            This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
            – Moo
            Jul 15 '17 at 7:50










          • So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
            – Mophotla
            Jul 15 '17 at 21:15






          • 1




            @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
            – Moo
            Jul 16 '17 at 2:43















          "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
          – George Y.
          Jul 15 '17 at 5:22




          "By definition, an airside transit does not involve immigration checks" - as far as I remember, it does. You cannot simply walk into transit area, you go through a staffed desk which checks your passport and boarding pass. They don't stamp your passport though. Note that there is no exit passport control in UK, so someone can leave the airport from airside without much hassle.
          – George Y.
          Jul 15 '17 at 5:22












          @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
          – Crazydre
          Jul 15 '17 at 6:20





          @GeorgeY. Depends on the Airport. At most airports I've been to they either check nothing at all (eg Zurich), or just the boarding pass (eg Doha). Some (e.g. Kiev) do often ask to see my ID though, and some countries like Canada and Mauritius require transit passengers to hold a document accepted for entry
          – Crazydre
          Jul 15 '17 at 6:20





          1




          1




          This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
          – Moo
          Jul 15 '17 at 7:50




          This. These issues are all about misuse of the "hidden city" aspect for asylum seeking behaviour - if it were allowed, it would be a fairly large loophole exploitable for anyone who can afford the airfare.
          – Moo
          Jul 15 '17 at 7:50












          So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
          – Mophotla
          Jul 15 '17 at 21:15




          So what happens if a DATV holder claims asylum? Will they be forced to board their connecting flight? What if they cancelled the connecting segment after applying for the visa in order to avoid this?
          – Mophotla
          Jul 15 '17 at 21:15




          1




          1




          @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
          – Moo
          Jul 16 '17 at 2:43




          @Mophotla a DATV holder has already undergone scrutiny, if UK immigration had any concerns about asylum seeking behaviour they wouldn't be issued the DATV. If a traveller manages to gain a DATV and subsequently claims asylum, regardless of whether the ongoing segment is cancelled or not, as Crazydre says, their claim would be considered and the airline would be off the hook.
          – Moo
          Jul 16 '17 at 2:43

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f98113%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-uk-airside-transit-visas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

          ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ

          How do I collapse sections of code in Visual Studio Code for Windows?