Error when using the commands cd.. and cd. in the terminal [duplicate]



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7
















This question already has an answer here:



  • How do I navigate between directories in terminal?

    4 answers



I try to use the commands cd.. and cd. in the terminal to move from my current folder to a previous one, and it shows me a message that the command doesn't exist...



What could the problem be? I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Helio, karel, Thomas, Fabby, David Foerster Aug 29 '18 at 20:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3





    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:29







  • 2





    To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

    – George Udosen
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:31






  • 4





    @GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

    – dsstorefile1
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:38

















7
















This question already has an answer here:



  • How do I navigate between directories in terminal?

    4 answers



I try to use the commands cd.. and cd. in the terminal to move from my current folder to a previous one, and it shows me a message that the command doesn't exist...



What could the problem be? I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Helio, karel, Thomas, Fabby, David Foerster Aug 29 '18 at 20:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3





    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:29







  • 2





    To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

    – George Udosen
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:31






  • 4





    @GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

    – dsstorefile1
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:38













7












7








7









This question already has an answer here:



  • How do I navigate between directories in terminal?

    4 answers



I try to use the commands cd.. and cd. in the terminal to move from my current folder to a previous one, and it shows me a message that the command doesn't exist...



What could the problem be? I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • How do I navigate between directories in terminal?

    4 answers



I try to use the commands cd.. and cd. in the terminal to move from my current folder to a previous one, and it shows me a message that the command doesn't exist...



What could the problem be? I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.





This question already has an answer here:



  • How do I navigate between directories in terminal?

    4 answers







command-line bash cd-command






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 29 '18 at 14:21









Zanna

51.5k13141244




51.5k13141244










asked Aug 29 '18 at 13:17









dsmastrodomenicdsmastrodomenic

392




392




marked as duplicate by Helio, karel, Thomas, Fabby, David Foerster Aug 29 '18 at 20:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Helio, karel, Thomas, Fabby, David Foerster Aug 29 '18 at 20:34


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 3





    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:29







  • 2





    To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

    – George Udosen
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:31






  • 4





    @GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

    – dsstorefile1
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:38












  • 3





    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:29







  • 2





    To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

    – George Udosen
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:31






  • 4





    @GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

    – dsstorefile1
    Aug 29 '18 at 13:38







3




3





You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

– Helio
Aug 29 '18 at 13:29






You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go). By the way: welcome to AskUbuntu.

– Helio
Aug 29 '18 at 13:29





2




2





To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

– George Udosen
Aug 29 '18 at 13:31





To add cd.. is a Windows thing..

– George Udosen
Aug 29 '18 at 13:31




4




4





@GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

– dsstorefile1
Aug 29 '18 at 13:38





@GeorgeUdosen DOS thing, too. I made the same mistake OP did when I first opened a bash shell.

– dsstorefile1
Aug 29 '18 at 13:38










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















17














You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go).



In your case, you should use cd .. instead of cd..



Also, please note that the previous folder directory is not the same as the parent directory. I encourage you to check this answer to obtain more information about the directory navigation basics in Linux.






share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

    – Emil Jeřábek
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:34






  • 1





    The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

    – jamesqf
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:42











  • @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:58






  • 5





    Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:44







  • 2





    @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:31



















6














Try this to save your sanity:



alias cd..='cd ..'


Now you can type it either with the space or without and it will still work.



Explanation:
Windows and MS-DOS allow you to type CD.. to change directory to one level higher than you currently are. Some commands are built in to the command interpreter on those systems. Linux (and probably other *nixes) looks for a program followed by arguments, and the only way to separate the program and arguments is with a space. Hence, Linux is only seeing one command called 'cd..' and it can't find the executable for it. What you mean is 'cd ..' (cd => program, .. => argument).



My solution adds an alias for 'cd..' so that when you type that on a command line the system will instead run 'cd ..' (with space). See the other comments to this answer to see about adding that as a permanent alias.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:15






  • 2





    +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

    – RoVo
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:19






  • 2





    While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

    – Clément
    Aug 29 '18 at 17:11






  • 1





    @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

    – Luke G.
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:32






  • 2





    cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

    – hobbs
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:41


















3














The actual command is cd ... You forgot that space.






share|improve this answer





























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17














    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go).



    In your case, you should use cd .. instead of cd..



    Also, please note that the previous folder directory is not the same as the parent directory. I encourage you to check this answer to obtain more information about the directory navigation basics in Linux.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 5





      One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

      – Emil Jeřábek
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:34






    • 1





      The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

      – jamesqf
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:42











    • @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:58






    • 5





      Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:44







    • 2





      @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:31
















    17














    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go).



    In your case, you should use cd .. instead of cd..



    Also, please note that the previous folder directory is not the same as the parent directory. I encourage you to check this answer to obtain more information about the directory navigation basics in Linux.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 5





      One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

      – Emil Jeřábek
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:34






    • 1





      The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

      – jamesqf
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:42











    • @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:58






    • 5





      Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:44







    • 2





      @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:31














    17












    17








    17







    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go).



    In your case, you should use cd .. instead of cd..



    Also, please note that the previous folder directory is not the same as the parent directory. I encourage you to check this answer to obtain more information about the directory navigation basics in Linux.






    share|improve this answer















    You need to add a space between the commmand (cd) and the arguments (the path where you want to go).



    In your case, you should use cd .. instead of cd..



    Also, please note that the previous folder directory is not the same as the parent directory. I encourage you to check this answer to obtain more information about the directory navigation basics in Linux.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 29 '18 at 16:52

























    answered Aug 29 '18 at 13:19









    HelioHelio

    5,49432950




    5,49432950







    • 5





      One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

      – Emil Jeřábek
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:34






    • 1





      The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

      – jamesqf
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:42











    • @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:58






    • 5





      Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:44







    • 2





      @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:31













    • 5





      One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

      – Emil Jeřábek
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:34






    • 1





      The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

      – jamesqf
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:42











    • @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 16:58






    • 5





      Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:44







    • 2





      @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

      – Helio
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:31








    5




    5





    One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

    – Emil Jeřábek
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:34





    One thing mentioned neither in the linked answer nor here is that the way to get to the “previous folder” is cd -.

    – Emil Jeřábek
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:34




    1




    1





    The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

    – jamesqf
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:42





    The answer would be improved if it used the correct term: directory.

    – jamesqf
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:42













    @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:58





    @jamesqf: you're right, I didn't think about the OP words.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 16:58




    5




    5





    Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:44






    Much as Linuxers like to insist on "directory", there's nothing wrong with using the term "folder" for a directory, not only because in most contexts they are interchangeable terms (note that Linux file management programs like nautilus use the latter (context menu offers Create Folder)) but also because while in technical usage a folder might not always be a directory, a directory will always be a folder.

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:44





    2




    2





    @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:31






    @Zanna, I'm not usually prone to argue about these common and seemingly improductive semantical and/or historical holy wars. However, I think that "folder" is a widespread term that is easier to grasp for the reader, even if "directory" can be used here with the same (or more precise) meaning. This reminds me an old answer, in which I learned that on the Kernel Ext4 documentation, that type of inode is called directory.

    – Helio
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:31














    6














    Try this to save your sanity:



    alias cd..='cd ..'


    Now you can type it either with the space or without and it will still work.



    Explanation:
    Windows and MS-DOS allow you to type CD.. to change directory to one level higher than you currently are. Some commands are built in to the command interpreter on those systems. Linux (and probably other *nixes) looks for a program followed by arguments, and the only way to separate the program and arguments is with a space. Hence, Linux is only seeing one command called 'cd..' and it can't find the executable for it. What you mean is 'cd ..' (cd => program, .. => argument).



    My solution adds an alias for 'cd..' so that when you type that on a command line the system will instead run 'cd ..' (with space). See the other comments to this answer to see about adding that as a permanent alias.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:15






    • 2





      +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

      – RoVo
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:19






    • 2





      While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

      – Clément
      Aug 29 '18 at 17:11






    • 1





      @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

      – Luke G.
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:32






    • 2





      cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

      – hobbs
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:41















    6














    Try this to save your sanity:



    alias cd..='cd ..'


    Now you can type it either with the space or without and it will still work.



    Explanation:
    Windows and MS-DOS allow you to type CD.. to change directory to one level higher than you currently are. Some commands are built in to the command interpreter on those systems. Linux (and probably other *nixes) looks for a program followed by arguments, and the only way to separate the program and arguments is with a space. Hence, Linux is only seeing one command called 'cd..' and it can't find the executable for it. What you mean is 'cd ..' (cd => program, .. => argument).



    My solution adds an alias for 'cd..' so that when you type that on a command line the system will instead run 'cd ..' (with space). See the other comments to this answer to see about adding that as a permanent alias.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:15






    • 2





      +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

      – RoVo
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:19






    • 2





      While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

      – Clément
      Aug 29 '18 at 17:11






    • 1





      @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

      – Luke G.
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:32






    • 2





      cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

      – hobbs
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:41













    6












    6








    6







    Try this to save your sanity:



    alias cd..='cd ..'


    Now you can type it either with the space or without and it will still work.



    Explanation:
    Windows and MS-DOS allow you to type CD.. to change directory to one level higher than you currently are. Some commands are built in to the command interpreter on those systems. Linux (and probably other *nixes) looks for a program followed by arguments, and the only way to separate the program and arguments is with a space. Hence, Linux is only seeing one command called 'cd..' and it can't find the executable for it. What you mean is 'cd ..' (cd => program, .. => argument).



    My solution adds an alias for 'cd..' so that when you type that on a command line the system will instead run 'cd ..' (with space). See the other comments to this answer to see about adding that as a permanent alias.






    share|improve this answer















    Try this to save your sanity:



    alias cd..='cd ..'


    Now you can type it either with the space or without and it will still work.



    Explanation:
    Windows and MS-DOS allow you to type CD.. to change directory to one level higher than you currently are. Some commands are built in to the command interpreter on those systems. Linux (and probably other *nixes) looks for a program followed by arguments, and the only way to separate the program and arguments is with a space. Hence, Linux is only seeing one command called 'cd..' and it can't find the executable for it. What you mean is 'cd ..' (cd => program, .. => argument).



    My solution adds an alias for 'cd..' so that when you type that on a command line the system will instead run 'cd ..' (with space). See the other comments to this answer to see about adding that as a permanent alias.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 29 '18 at 18:32

























    answered Aug 29 '18 at 13:55









    Luke G.Luke G.

    1693




    1693







    • 3





      nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:15






    • 2





      +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

      – RoVo
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:19






    • 2





      While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

      – Clément
      Aug 29 '18 at 17:11






    • 1





      @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

      – Luke G.
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:32






    • 2





      cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

      – hobbs
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:41












    • 3





      nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

      – Zanna
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:15






    • 2





      +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

      – RoVo
      Aug 29 '18 at 14:19






    • 2





      While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

      – Clément
      Aug 29 '18 at 17:11






    • 1





      @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

      – Luke G.
      Aug 29 '18 at 18:32






    • 2





      cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

      – hobbs
      Aug 29 '18 at 19:41







    3




    3





    nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:15





    nice :) You could add how to make this permanent by adding to .bashrc

    – Zanna
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:15




    2




    2





    +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

    – RoVo
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:19





    +1 Aliases are the best. I also use kk and öö as alias for ll ;-) and yoda as alias for sudo :-D

    – RoVo
    Aug 29 '18 at 14:19




    2




    2





    While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

    – Clément
    Aug 29 '18 at 17:11





    While this is an interesting workaround, I don't think it's a good idea to skip the explanation of why a basic command doesn't work by providing a more complex command, still without explanation.

    – Clément
    Aug 29 '18 at 17:11




    1




    1





    @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

    – Luke G.
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:32





    @Clément, true. I've added an explanation.

    – Luke G.
    Aug 29 '18 at 18:32




    2




    2





    cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

    – hobbs
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:41





    cd is also a builtin command on unix shells — but builtin commands obey the same syntax as external commands they don't get their own rules :)

    – hobbs
    Aug 29 '18 at 19:41











    3














    The actual command is cd ... You forgot that space.






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      The actual command is cd ... You forgot that space.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        The actual command is cd ... You forgot that space.






        share|improve this answer













        The actual command is cd ... You forgot that space.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 29 '18 at 13:20









        KulfyKulfy

        5,32561945




        5,32561945













            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Edmonton

            Crossroads (UK TV series)