Kubernetes: Route incomming traffic to specific Pod









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I want to deploy many Pods in Google Kubernetes Engine and then establish a TCP connection to each specific Pod by Subdomain like pod-name-or-label.mydomain.com or path routing like protocol://mydomain.com:7878/pod-name-or-label.



I have looked in different directions like Istio or nginx-ingress, but that seems to me to be too complicated.



Is not there a simple solution for that?










share|improve this question























  • A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
    – ericstaples
    Nov 8 at 17:51










  • Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 8 at 18:18










  • This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
    – Milad
    Nov 8 at 22:58














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I want to deploy many Pods in Google Kubernetes Engine and then establish a TCP connection to each specific Pod by Subdomain like pod-name-or-label.mydomain.com or path routing like protocol://mydomain.com:7878/pod-name-or-label.



I have looked in different directions like Istio or nginx-ingress, but that seems to me to be too complicated.



Is not there a simple solution for that?










share|improve this question























  • A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
    – ericstaples
    Nov 8 at 17:51










  • Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 8 at 18:18










  • This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
    – Milad
    Nov 8 at 22:58












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I want to deploy many Pods in Google Kubernetes Engine and then establish a TCP connection to each specific Pod by Subdomain like pod-name-or-label.mydomain.com or path routing like protocol://mydomain.com:7878/pod-name-or-label.



I have looked in different directions like Istio or nginx-ingress, but that seems to me to be too complicated.



Is not there a simple solution for that?










share|improve this question















I want to deploy many Pods in Google Kubernetes Engine and then establish a TCP connection to each specific Pod by Subdomain like pod-name-or-label.mydomain.com or path routing like protocol://mydomain.com:7878/pod-name-or-label.



I have looked in different directions like Istio or nginx-ingress, but that seems to me to be too complicated.



Is not there a simple solution for that?







kubernetes network-programming kubernetes-ingress gke istio






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 8 at 21:29









Rico

23.6k94864




23.6k94864










asked Nov 8 at 17:05









micha

115




115











  • A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
    – ericstaples
    Nov 8 at 17:51










  • Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 8 at 18:18










  • This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
    – Milad
    Nov 8 at 22:58
















  • A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
    – ericstaples
    Nov 8 at 17:51










  • Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
    – Ijaz Ahmad Khan
    Nov 8 at 18:18










  • This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
    – Milad
    Nov 8 at 22:58















A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
– ericstaples
Nov 8 at 17:51




A standalone Pod is not the way to go for this and is most certainly an anti-pattern. Your best bet is to move up a couple abstractions to the Deployment resource, and then you can deploy multiple copies of your Pod with some variation in labels between them to dictate ingress and routing.
– ericstaples
Nov 8 at 17:51












Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
– Ijaz Ahmad Khan
Nov 8 at 18:18




Pod is not something to work with in production , define a deployment and expose it using nodePort , then use session persistence with kube-proxy set to serve from local node only.
– Ijaz Ahmad Khan
Nov 8 at 18:18












This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
– Milad
Nov 8 at 22:58




This article shows how to create Kubernetes Services in a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster And how to create a service of Nodeport.
– Milad
Nov 8 at 22:58












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













For Istio, You can use VirtualService to control the routing rules to the target subset with defining by DestinationRules.



The DestinationRule will route to the target Pods by the specified label pods.



The request flow will like to:



+--------------------+
| |
| Istio Gateway |
| |
| |
+---------+----------+
|traffic incoming
|
+---------v----------+
| |
| VirtualService |
| |
| |
+---------+----------+
|route to subset by the routing rules
v

+--------------------+
| |
| DestinationRules |
| |
| |
+---------+----------+
|route traffic to target pods
v

+--------------------+
| |
| |
| Pods |
| |
+--------------------+


so as @ericstaples said you should create different Deployments with different pod labels to achieve separating traffic to the target pods, Example:



  1. create a deployment with pod label: t1

  2. create a subset in DestinationRule: select t1 label pod as subset s1

  3. control your traffic in VirtualService that route to s1 subset


  4. s1 route to the target pods

also for expose Gateway, you can use ClusterIP or NodePort like ** Kubernetes** other service did, see more of Istio Traffic.



There are some references maybe it's helpful:



https://istio.io/docs/concepts/traffic-management/



https://istio.io/docs/tasks/traffic-management/request-routing/






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Now i have that solution with istio installed on the cluster:



    apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
    kind: Gateway
    metadata:
    name: echo-gateway
    spec:
    selector:
    istio: ingressgateway # use istio default controller
    servers:
    - port:
    number: 80
    name: http
    protocol: HTTP
    hosts:
    - "dev.sample.com"


    With that gateway i can apply that Deployment, Service, VirtualService



    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    metadata:
    name: my-echo-1000-deployment
    labels:
    echoservice: echo-1000
    spec:
    replicas: 1
    selector:
    matchLabels:
    echoservice: echo-1000
    template:
    metadata:
    labels:
    echoservice: echo-1000
    spec:
    containers:
    - image: gcr.io/google-containers/echoserver:1.10
    imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
    name: my-echo-run-container
    ports:
    - containerPort: 8080
    protocol: TCP

    ---

    apiVersion: v1
    kind: Service
    metadata:
    name: my-echo-1000-service
    labels:
    echoservice: echo-1000
    spec:
    ports:
    - port: 8080
    name: http
    selector:
    echoservice: echo-1000

    ---

    apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
    kind: VirtualService
    metadata:
    name: my-echo-1000-vservice
    spec:
    hosts:
    - "dev.sample.com"
    gateways:
    - echo-gateway
    http:
    - match:
    - uri:
    exact: /echo-1000
    route:
    - destination:
    host: my-echo-1000-service
    port:
    number: 8080


    Get the LoadbalancerIP from istio-ingressgateway and make an entry in /etc/hosts for dev.sample.com



    Now i can get the echoserver in specific Pod with http://dev.sample.com/echo-1000



    Is that a good solution or is there a better one?






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53212748%2fkubernetes-route-incomming-traffic-to-specific-pod%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      0
      down vote













      For Istio, You can use VirtualService to control the routing rules to the target subset with defining by DestinationRules.



      The DestinationRule will route to the target Pods by the specified label pods.



      The request flow will like to:



      +--------------------+
      | |
      | Istio Gateway |
      | |
      | |
      +---------+----------+
      |traffic incoming
      |
      +---------v----------+
      | |
      | VirtualService |
      | |
      | |
      +---------+----------+
      |route to subset by the routing rules
      v

      +--------------------+
      | |
      | DestinationRules |
      | |
      | |
      +---------+----------+
      |route traffic to target pods
      v

      +--------------------+
      | |
      | |
      | Pods |
      | |
      +--------------------+


      so as @ericstaples said you should create different Deployments with different pod labels to achieve separating traffic to the target pods, Example:



      1. create a deployment with pod label: t1

      2. create a subset in DestinationRule: select t1 label pod as subset s1

      3. control your traffic in VirtualService that route to s1 subset


      4. s1 route to the target pods

      also for expose Gateway, you can use ClusterIP or NodePort like ** Kubernetes** other service did, see more of Istio Traffic.



      There are some references maybe it's helpful:



      https://istio.io/docs/concepts/traffic-management/



      https://istio.io/docs/tasks/traffic-management/request-routing/






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        For Istio, You can use VirtualService to control the routing rules to the target subset with defining by DestinationRules.



        The DestinationRule will route to the target Pods by the specified label pods.



        The request flow will like to:



        +--------------------+
        | |
        | Istio Gateway |
        | |
        | |
        +---------+----------+
        |traffic incoming
        |
        +---------v----------+
        | |
        | VirtualService |
        | |
        | |
        +---------+----------+
        |route to subset by the routing rules
        v

        +--------------------+
        | |
        | DestinationRules |
        | |
        | |
        +---------+----------+
        |route traffic to target pods
        v

        +--------------------+
        | |
        | |
        | Pods |
        | |
        +--------------------+


        so as @ericstaples said you should create different Deployments with different pod labels to achieve separating traffic to the target pods, Example:



        1. create a deployment with pod label: t1

        2. create a subset in DestinationRule: select t1 label pod as subset s1

        3. control your traffic in VirtualService that route to s1 subset


        4. s1 route to the target pods

        also for expose Gateway, you can use ClusterIP or NodePort like ** Kubernetes** other service did, see more of Istio Traffic.



        There are some references maybe it's helpful:



        https://istio.io/docs/concepts/traffic-management/



        https://istio.io/docs/tasks/traffic-management/request-routing/






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          For Istio, You can use VirtualService to control the routing rules to the target subset with defining by DestinationRules.



          The DestinationRule will route to the target Pods by the specified label pods.



          The request flow will like to:



          +--------------------+
          | |
          | Istio Gateway |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |traffic incoming
          |
          +---------v----------+
          | |
          | VirtualService |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |route to subset by the routing rules
          v

          +--------------------+
          | |
          | DestinationRules |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |route traffic to target pods
          v

          +--------------------+
          | |
          | |
          | Pods |
          | |
          +--------------------+


          so as @ericstaples said you should create different Deployments with different pod labels to achieve separating traffic to the target pods, Example:



          1. create a deployment with pod label: t1

          2. create a subset in DestinationRule: select t1 label pod as subset s1

          3. control your traffic in VirtualService that route to s1 subset


          4. s1 route to the target pods

          also for expose Gateway, you can use ClusterIP or NodePort like ** Kubernetes** other service did, see more of Istio Traffic.



          There are some references maybe it's helpful:



          https://istio.io/docs/concepts/traffic-management/



          https://istio.io/docs/tasks/traffic-management/request-routing/






          share|improve this answer












          For Istio, You can use VirtualService to control the routing rules to the target subset with defining by DestinationRules.



          The DestinationRule will route to the target Pods by the specified label pods.



          The request flow will like to:



          +--------------------+
          | |
          | Istio Gateway |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |traffic incoming
          |
          +---------v----------+
          | |
          | VirtualService |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |route to subset by the routing rules
          v

          +--------------------+
          | |
          | DestinationRules |
          | |
          | |
          +---------+----------+
          |route traffic to target pods
          v

          +--------------------+
          | |
          | |
          | Pods |
          | |
          +--------------------+


          so as @ericstaples said you should create different Deployments with different pod labels to achieve separating traffic to the target pods, Example:



          1. create a deployment with pod label: t1

          2. create a subset in DestinationRule: select t1 label pod as subset s1

          3. control your traffic in VirtualService that route to s1 subset


          4. s1 route to the target pods

          also for expose Gateway, you can use ClusterIP or NodePort like ** Kubernetes** other service did, see more of Istio Traffic.



          There are some references maybe it's helpful:



          https://istio.io/docs/concepts/traffic-management/



          https://istio.io/docs/tasks/traffic-management/request-routing/







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 10 at 18:29









          chengpohi

          11.5k1229




          11.5k1229






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Now i have that solution with istio installed on the cluster:



              apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
              kind: Gateway
              metadata:
              name: echo-gateway
              spec:
              selector:
              istio: ingressgateway # use istio default controller
              servers:
              - port:
              number: 80
              name: http
              protocol: HTTP
              hosts:
              - "dev.sample.com"


              With that gateway i can apply that Deployment, Service, VirtualService



              apiVersion: apps/v1
              kind: Deployment
              metadata:
              name: my-echo-1000-deployment
              labels:
              echoservice: echo-1000
              spec:
              replicas: 1
              selector:
              matchLabels:
              echoservice: echo-1000
              template:
              metadata:
              labels:
              echoservice: echo-1000
              spec:
              containers:
              - image: gcr.io/google-containers/echoserver:1.10
              imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
              name: my-echo-run-container
              ports:
              - containerPort: 8080
              protocol: TCP

              ---

              apiVersion: v1
              kind: Service
              metadata:
              name: my-echo-1000-service
              labels:
              echoservice: echo-1000
              spec:
              ports:
              - port: 8080
              name: http
              selector:
              echoservice: echo-1000

              ---

              apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
              kind: VirtualService
              metadata:
              name: my-echo-1000-vservice
              spec:
              hosts:
              - "dev.sample.com"
              gateways:
              - echo-gateway
              http:
              - match:
              - uri:
              exact: /echo-1000
              route:
              - destination:
              host: my-echo-1000-service
              port:
              number: 8080


              Get the LoadbalancerIP from istio-ingressgateway and make an entry in /etc/hosts for dev.sample.com



              Now i can get the echoserver in specific Pod with http://dev.sample.com/echo-1000



              Is that a good solution or is there a better one?






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Now i have that solution with istio installed on the cluster:



                apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                kind: Gateway
                metadata:
                name: echo-gateway
                spec:
                selector:
                istio: ingressgateway # use istio default controller
                servers:
                - port:
                number: 80
                name: http
                protocol: HTTP
                hosts:
                - "dev.sample.com"


                With that gateway i can apply that Deployment, Service, VirtualService



                apiVersion: apps/v1
                kind: Deployment
                metadata:
                name: my-echo-1000-deployment
                labels:
                echoservice: echo-1000
                spec:
                replicas: 1
                selector:
                matchLabels:
                echoservice: echo-1000
                template:
                metadata:
                labels:
                echoservice: echo-1000
                spec:
                containers:
                - image: gcr.io/google-containers/echoserver:1.10
                imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
                name: my-echo-run-container
                ports:
                - containerPort: 8080
                protocol: TCP

                ---

                apiVersion: v1
                kind: Service
                metadata:
                name: my-echo-1000-service
                labels:
                echoservice: echo-1000
                spec:
                ports:
                - port: 8080
                name: http
                selector:
                echoservice: echo-1000

                ---

                apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                kind: VirtualService
                metadata:
                name: my-echo-1000-vservice
                spec:
                hosts:
                - "dev.sample.com"
                gateways:
                - echo-gateway
                http:
                - match:
                - uri:
                exact: /echo-1000
                route:
                - destination:
                host: my-echo-1000-service
                port:
                number: 8080


                Get the LoadbalancerIP from istio-ingressgateway and make an entry in /etc/hosts for dev.sample.com



                Now i can get the echoserver in specific Pod with http://dev.sample.com/echo-1000



                Is that a good solution or is there a better one?






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  Now i have that solution with istio installed on the cluster:



                  apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                  kind: Gateway
                  metadata:
                  name: echo-gateway
                  spec:
                  selector:
                  istio: ingressgateway # use istio default controller
                  servers:
                  - port:
                  number: 80
                  name: http
                  protocol: HTTP
                  hosts:
                  - "dev.sample.com"


                  With that gateway i can apply that Deployment, Service, VirtualService



                  apiVersion: apps/v1
                  kind: Deployment
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-deployment
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  replicas: 1
                  selector:
                  matchLabels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  template:
                  metadata:
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  containers:
                  - image: gcr.io/google-containers/echoserver:1.10
                  imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
                  name: my-echo-run-container
                  ports:
                  - containerPort: 8080
                  protocol: TCP

                  ---

                  apiVersion: v1
                  kind: Service
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-service
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  ports:
                  - port: 8080
                  name: http
                  selector:
                  echoservice: echo-1000

                  ---

                  apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                  kind: VirtualService
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-vservice
                  spec:
                  hosts:
                  - "dev.sample.com"
                  gateways:
                  - echo-gateway
                  http:
                  - match:
                  - uri:
                  exact: /echo-1000
                  route:
                  - destination:
                  host: my-echo-1000-service
                  port:
                  number: 8080


                  Get the LoadbalancerIP from istio-ingressgateway and make an entry in /etc/hosts for dev.sample.com



                  Now i can get the echoserver in specific Pod with http://dev.sample.com/echo-1000



                  Is that a good solution or is there a better one?






                  share|improve this answer












                  Now i have that solution with istio installed on the cluster:



                  apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                  kind: Gateway
                  metadata:
                  name: echo-gateway
                  spec:
                  selector:
                  istio: ingressgateway # use istio default controller
                  servers:
                  - port:
                  number: 80
                  name: http
                  protocol: HTTP
                  hosts:
                  - "dev.sample.com"


                  With that gateway i can apply that Deployment, Service, VirtualService



                  apiVersion: apps/v1
                  kind: Deployment
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-deployment
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  replicas: 1
                  selector:
                  matchLabels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  template:
                  metadata:
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  containers:
                  - image: gcr.io/google-containers/echoserver:1.10
                  imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
                  name: my-echo-run-container
                  ports:
                  - containerPort: 8080
                  protocol: TCP

                  ---

                  apiVersion: v1
                  kind: Service
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-service
                  labels:
                  echoservice: echo-1000
                  spec:
                  ports:
                  - port: 8080
                  name: http
                  selector:
                  echoservice: echo-1000

                  ---

                  apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
                  kind: VirtualService
                  metadata:
                  name: my-echo-1000-vservice
                  spec:
                  hosts:
                  - "dev.sample.com"
                  gateways:
                  - echo-gateway
                  http:
                  - match:
                  - uri:
                  exact: /echo-1000
                  route:
                  - destination:
                  host: my-echo-1000-service
                  port:
                  number: 8080


                  Get the LoadbalancerIP from istio-ingressgateway and make an entry in /etc/hosts for dev.sample.com



                  Now i can get the echoserver in specific Pod with http://dev.sample.com/echo-1000



                  Is that a good solution or is there a better one?







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 12 at 16:03









                  micha

                  115




                  115



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53212748%2fkubernetes-route-incomming-traffic-to-specific-pod%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                      Edmonton

                      Crossroads (UK TV series)