Why frequent inflight directions to Sachs Harbour and Eureka?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I was recently on a Royal Jordanian flight from Hong Kong to Bangkok. The inflight airshow cycled through the usual screens - total flight, day/night, stats of the flight, direction of Mecca, etc etc.



One screen I could not get my head around, for the entire flight we were regularly updated about the distance to Sachs Harbour and Eureka:



Screen



Why?










share|improve this question

















  • 1




    My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
    – Michael Seifert
    Jan 29 at 2:56










  • I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
    – mkennedy
    Jan 29 at 18:37










  • Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
    – jcaron
    May 15 at 16:04
















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I was recently on a Royal Jordanian flight from Hong Kong to Bangkok. The inflight airshow cycled through the usual screens - total flight, day/night, stats of the flight, direction of Mecca, etc etc.



One screen I could not get my head around, for the entire flight we were regularly updated about the distance to Sachs Harbour and Eureka:



Screen



Why?










share|improve this question

















  • 1




    My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
    – Michael Seifert
    Jan 29 at 2:56










  • I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
    – mkennedy
    Jan 29 at 18:37










  • Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
    – jcaron
    May 15 at 16:04












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I was recently on a Royal Jordanian flight from Hong Kong to Bangkok. The inflight airshow cycled through the usual screens - total flight, day/night, stats of the flight, direction of Mecca, etc etc.



One screen I could not get my head around, for the entire flight we were regularly updated about the distance to Sachs Harbour and Eureka:



Screen



Why?










share|improve this question













I was recently on a Royal Jordanian flight from Hong Kong to Bangkok. The inflight airshow cycled through the usual screens - total flight, day/night, stats of the flight, direction of Mecca, etc etc.



One screen I could not get my head around, for the entire flight we were regularly updated about the distance to Sachs Harbour and Eureka:



Screen



Why?







air-travel maps in-flight-services






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 29 at 1:58









Matt

1311




1311







  • 1




    My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
    – Michael Seifert
    Jan 29 at 2:56










  • I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
    – mkennedy
    Jan 29 at 18:37










  • Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
    – jcaron
    May 15 at 16:04












  • 1




    My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
    – Michael Seifert
    Jan 29 at 2:56










  • I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
    – mkennedy
    Jan 29 at 18:37










  • Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
    – jcaron
    May 15 at 16:04







1




1




My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
– Michael Seifert
Jan 29 at 2:56




My guess is that this is a bug in the software running on Royal Jordanian's systems, and that it should be pointing you towards nearer settlements. But it'll be practically impossible to confirm this definitively unless someone who works for Royal Jordanian's software contractor happens by.
– Michael Seifert
Jan 29 at 2:56












I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
– mkennedy
Jan 29 at 18:37




I would suspect an easter egg. A programmer who worked on it was from one or both towns or liked a tv show set there or something.
– mkennedy
Jan 29 at 18:37












Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
– jcaron
May 15 at 16:04




Based on distance, I would think that the "Eureka" is the one in Nunavut, Canada, but the direction does not seem correct for either (should be 3° for Eureka and 15° for Sachs Harbour, not roughly 50° as the maps seems to indicate). Both places are pretty isolated quite far North. Maybe it was just an error entering the codes (YSY for Sach Harbour and YEU for Eureka) instead of the intended landmarks?
– jcaron
May 15 at 16:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













There is no practical reason for it: its either a bug or an easter egg of some sort. In-flight entertainment systems are not exactly known for their excellent operation.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "273"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108904%2fwhy-frequent-inflight-directions-to-sachs-harbour-and-eureka%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    There is no practical reason for it: its either a bug or an easter egg of some sort. In-flight entertainment systems are not exactly known for their excellent operation.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      There is no practical reason for it: its either a bug or an easter egg of some sort. In-flight entertainment systems are not exactly known for their excellent operation.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        There is no practical reason for it: its either a bug or an easter egg of some sort. In-flight entertainment systems are not exactly known for their excellent operation.






        share|improve this answer












        There is no practical reason for it: its either a bug or an easter egg of some sort. In-flight entertainment systems are not exactly known for their excellent operation.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 14 at 22:45









        JonathanReez♦

        46.6k36213458




        46.6k36213458



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108904%2fwhy-frequent-inflight-directions-to-sachs-harbour-and-eureka%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest














































































            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            How do I collapse sections of code in Visual Studio Code for Windows?

            ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ