Schengen Visa Refusal: Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
20
down vote

favorite
1












Schengen refusal formulae can be difficult to understand sometimes.



When an applicant receives a refusal with "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided", what does it mean?







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:04










  • @pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:18










  • Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
    – RedGrittyBrick
    Mar 21 at 16:12

















up vote
20
down vote

favorite
1












Schengen refusal formulae can be difficult to understand sometimes.



When an applicant receives a refusal with "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided", what does it mean?







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:04










  • @pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:18










  • Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
    – RedGrittyBrick
    Mar 21 at 16:12













up vote
20
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
20
down vote

favorite
1






1





Schengen refusal formulae can be difficult to understand sometimes.



When an applicant receives a refusal with "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided", what does it mean?







share|improve this question














Schengen refusal formulae can be difficult to understand sometimes.



When an applicant receives a refusal with "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided", what does it mean?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 15 '15 at 6:25









hippietrail

45k35196512




45k35196512










asked Aug 14 '15 at 14:10









Gayot Fow

74.1k20192371




74.1k20192371







  • 1




    Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:04










  • @pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:18










  • Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
    – RedGrittyBrick
    Mar 21 at 16:12













  • 1




    Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:04










  • @pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
    – Quora Feans
    Aug 15 '15 at 1:18










  • Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
    – RedGrittyBrick
    Mar 21 at 16:12








1




1




Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
– Quora Feans
Aug 15 '15 at 1:04




Could you provide more background to this question? Country of origin, target country, intent of travel, economical situation, intended length of travel, age, previous travel there - these are all relevant facts.
– Quora Feans
Aug 15 '15 at 1:04












@pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
– Quora Feans
Aug 15 '15 at 1:18




@pnuts the "justification" part could be many things. They could be expecing a myriad of things that depends on the type of trip that was intended. The answer above give a general answer to a general question. Understanding the problem of the OP would be the only way of helping him.
– Quora Feans
Aug 15 '15 at 1:18












Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
– RedGrittyBrick
Mar 21 at 16:12





Note: "reliable" vs "provided" (this question)
– RedGrittyBrick
Mar 21 at 16:12











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
27
down vote













When you see "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" on a Schengen refusal, it usually means that they decided that the application was either 'incoherent', or not credible, or both.



Incoherence



Coherence has a special meaning in the Schengen vocabulary; it means clear, sensible, consistent, and most importantly, understandable. An 'incoherent' application lacks these qualities. Coherent applications will generally succeed; incoherent applications will not. Some examples of incoherence are given in the handbook...



  • an applicant claims to travel to an industrial area, staying in a cheap hotel, for the purpose of tourism;

  • an applicant claims to visit a professional event at dates that do not correspond to the actual dates of the event;

  • an applicant claims that the purpose of the trip is to visit a friend, but it turns out that the person concerned is absent during that period;

  • a trader in jewellery claims to have been invited to attend a medical conference.

While these examples may not correspond to your situation, they have a common thread where the application was not consistent with the applicant's job, status, or apparent life-style.



Premise



Incoherence also includes applications that did not successfully establish a premise for the visit. Commonly, there is no apparent connection between the applicant's itinerary and his career, apparent life-style, or financial capacity. Some examples of this are...



  • an applicant expresses interest in an event or geographic area for which there are no signs of previous interest;

  • an applicant presents a letter of invitation from a sponsor whose relationship with the applicant is unclear or distant;

  • an applicant is continually sponsored by the same person where there is no apparent justification for visiting that person;

  • an applicant cannot establish why a visit is contemplated at this particular time.

Credibility



An applicant's credibility can also result in a refusal reason of "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided".



Some examples of credibility problems are...



  • The applicant has an existing support network of friends or family that would easily enable them to break the rules;

  • A disproportionate amount of income is being spent for the visit;

  • The applicant has changed stories over the course of several interactions with Schengen officials and their credibility has been damaged;

  • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds really belong to the applicant;

  • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds were obtained legally;

  • The applicant has a history of prior refusals and there is no visible change in circumstances;

  • The applicant's submission contains gaps or evidential shortfalls that cannot be explained;

  • The applicant is going to a location where previous visa holders have entered breach;

  • The sponsor has a dubious status, or has sponsored people who have entered breach;

  • The sponsor attempts to attest to things that are beyond his control (like guaranteeing that the person will not overstay).

Appeal



All of the Schengen members offer a judicial remedy for a refusal, namely to appeal the decision. Each member has their own procedure and the particulars are too ponderous to cover here, but a refusal is accompanied with an explanation of how to proceed if the applicant wants to appeal. There is a great discussion about the decision to make an appeal here.



Fresh Application



The other option is to correct the deficiencies in your original application and apply again. This way is invariably faster and cheaper and there is no required interval or "cooling-off period" between successive applications. However, it's important to recognize that a fresh application made immediately after a refusal is a recipe for disaster when one of the refusal reasons is "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided". Before lodging a fresh application you need to understand precisely what brought about the refusal (especially if your credibility has been negatively assessed). For the best results, a fresh application should contain one or more of these...



  • An explanation of why you think the refusal happened;

  • An explanation of how your circumstances have changed since the refusal;

  • If the decision-maker relied upon an assumption that was adverse to you, then a brief clarification may be helpful;

  • If the decision-maker did not (apparently) examine evidence that was favourable to you, then a brief statement highlighting this may be helpful;

  • An itemized list of the evidence you are submitting to correct the problem(s) along with why you think each item will be helpful;

Legal Counsel



Understanding the various Schengen refusal formulae can be daunting. If you do not understand how "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" applies to your case, or you are unsure of what evidence you can use to have a better result, then it's advisable to arrange a consultation with a lawyer who operates a practice area in Schengen visas.



The downside is that you may get scammed, especially if you are in Africa or South Asia. For this reason, a safe strategy is to instruct a lawyer who is licensed to practice in the member state you are applying to. Each member state operates a professional body that licenses lawyers and regulates their practice in accordance with EU standards.



In Spain, for example, it is the CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA ABOGACÍA ESPAÑOLA



In Belgium, One such organisation is the Ordre des barreaux francophones



For others, you can use the search portal offered by The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).



Note that lawyers of this calibre will attract a fee for their services.



Combinations



In some of the more egregious cases, a refusal will also have this reason: "Your intention to leave the territory of the member state before the expiry of visa could not be ascertained". In these cases, the decision-maker concluded that you were not a bona fide applicant.



General Tips



  1. Tell the truth;

  2. Be sure your financial evidence contains movements that are well explained;

  3. Include all foreign travel in an itemized list;

  4. Be sure your visit is explained with a plausible itinerary;

  5. Don't make vacuous, inane promises about your intentions;

  6. Don't let your hosts make assurances about your intentions they can't keep;





share|improve this answer





















    protected by Community♦ Dec 10 '17 at 11:47



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    27
    down vote













    When you see "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" on a Schengen refusal, it usually means that they decided that the application was either 'incoherent', or not credible, or both.



    Incoherence



    Coherence has a special meaning in the Schengen vocabulary; it means clear, sensible, consistent, and most importantly, understandable. An 'incoherent' application lacks these qualities. Coherent applications will generally succeed; incoherent applications will not. Some examples of incoherence are given in the handbook...



    • an applicant claims to travel to an industrial area, staying in a cheap hotel, for the purpose of tourism;

    • an applicant claims to visit a professional event at dates that do not correspond to the actual dates of the event;

    • an applicant claims that the purpose of the trip is to visit a friend, but it turns out that the person concerned is absent during that period;

    • a trader in jewellery claims to have been invited to attend a medical conference.

    While these examples may not correspond to your situation, they have a common thread where the application was not consistent with the applicant's job, status, or apparent life-style.



    Premise



    Incoherence also includes applications that did not successfully establish a premise for the visit. Commonly, there is no apparent connection between the applicant's itinerary and his career, apparent life-style, or financial capacity. Some examples of this are...



    • an applicant expresses interest in an event or geographic area for which there are no signs of previous interest;

    • an applicant presents a letter of invitation from a sponsor whose relationship with the applicant is unclear or distant;

    • an applicant is continually sponsored by the same person where there is no apparent justification for visiting that person;

    • an applicant cannot establish why a visit is contemplated at this particular time.

    Credibility



    An applicant's credibility can also result in a refusal reason of "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided".



    Some examples of credibility problems are...



    • The applicant has an existing support network of friends or family that would easily enable them to break the rules;

    • A disproportionate amount of income is being spent for the visit;

    • The applicant has changed stories over the course of several interactions with Schengen officials and their credibility has been damaged;

    • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds really belong to the applicant;

    • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds were obtained legally;

    • The applicant has a history of prior refusals and there is no visible change in circumstances;

    • The applicant's submission contains gaps or evidential shortfalls that cannot be explained;

    • The applicant is going to a location where previous visa holders have entered breach;

    • The sponsor has a dubious status, or has sponsored people who have entered breach;

    • The sponsor attempts to attest to things that are beyond his control (like guaranteeing that the person will not overstay).

    Appeal



    All of the Schengen members offer a judicial remedy for a refusal, namely to appeal the decision. Each member has their own procedure and the particulars are too ponderous to cover here, but a refusal is accompanied with an explanation of how to proceed if the applicant wants to appeal. There is a great discussion about the decision to make an appeal here.



    Fresh Application



    The other option is to correct the deficiencies in your original application and apply again. This way is invariably faster and cheaper and there is no required interval or "cooling-off period" between successive applications. However, it's important to recognize that a fresh application made immediately after a refusal is a recipe for disaster when one of the refusal reasons is "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided". Before lodging a fresh application you need to understand precisely what brought about the refusal (especially if your credibility has been negatively assessed). For the best results, a fresh application should contain one or more of these...



    • An explanation of why you think the refusal happened;

    • An explanation of how your circumstances have changed since the refusal;

    • If the decision-maker relied upon an assumption that was adverse to you, then a brief clarification may be helpful;

    • If the decision-maker did not (apparently) examine evidence that was favourable to you, then a brief statement highlighting this may be helpful;

    • An itemized list of the evidence you are submitting to correct the problem(s) along with why you think each item will be helpful;

    Legal Counsel



    Understanding the various Schengen refusal formulae can be daunting. If you do not understand how "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" applies to your case, or you are unsure of what evidence you can use to have a better result, then it's advisable to arrange a consultation with a lawyer who operates a practice area in Schengen visas.



    The downside is that you may get scammed, especially if you are in Africa or South Asia. For this reason, a safe strategy is to instruct a lawyer who is licensed to practice in the member state you are applying to. Each member state operates a professional body that licenses lawyers and regulates their practice in accordance with EU standards.



    In Spain, for example, it is the CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA ABOGACÍA ESPAÑOLA



    In Belgium, One such organisation is the Ordre des barreaux francophones



    For others, you can use the search portal offered by The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).



    Note that lawyers of this calibre will attract a fee for their services.



    Combinations



    In some of the more egregious cases, a refusal will also have this reason: "Your intention to leave the territory of the member state before the expiry of visa could not be ascertained". In these cases, the decision-maker concluded that you were not a bona fide applicant.



    General Tips



    1. Tell the truth;

    2. Be sure your financial evidence contains movements that are well explained;

    3. Include all foreign travel in an itemized list;

    4. Be sure your visit is explained with a plausible itinerary;

    5. Don't make vacuous, inane promises about your intentions;

    6. Don't let your hosts make assurances about your intentions they can't keep;





    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      27
      down vote













      When you see "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" on a Schengen refusal, it usually means that they decided that the application was either 'incoherent', or not credible, or both.



      Incoherence



      Coherence has a special meaning in the Schengen vocabulary; it means clear, sensible, consistent, and most importantly, understandable. An 'incoherent' application lacks these qualities. Coherent applications will generally succeed; incoherent applications will not. Some examples of incoherence are given in the handbook...



      • an applicant claims to travel to an industrial area, staying in a cheap hotel, for the purpose of tourism;

      • an applicant claims to visit a professional event at dates that do not correspond to the actual dates of the event;

      • an applicant claims that the purpose of the trip is to visit a friend, but it turns out that the person concerned is absent during that period;

      • a trader in jewellery claims to have been invited to attend a medical conference.

      While these examples may not correspond to your situation, they have a common thread where the application was not consistent with the applicant's job, status, or apparent life-style.



      Premise



      Incoherence also includes applications that did not successfully establish a premise for the visit. Commonly, there is no apparent connection between the applicant's itinerary and his career, apparent life-style, or financial capacity. Some examples of this are...



      • an applicant expresses interest in an event or geographic area for which there are no signs of previous interest;

      • an applicant presents a letter of invitation from a sponsor whose relationship with the applicant is unclear or distant;

      • an applicant is continually sponsored by the same person where there is no apparent justification for visiting that person;

      • an applicant cannot establish why a visit is contemplated at this particular time.

      Credibility



      An applicant's credibility can also result in a refusal reason of "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided".



      Some examples of credibility problems are...



      • The applicant has an existing support network of friends or family that would easily enable them to break the rules;

      • A disproportionate amount of income is being spent for the visit;

      • The applicant has changed stories over the course of several interactions with Schengen officials and their credibility has been damaged;

      • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds really belong to the applicant;

      • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds were obtained legally;

      • The applicant has a history of prior refusals and there is no visible change in circumstances;

      • The applicant's submission contains gaps or evidential shortfalls that cannot be explained;

      • The applicant is going to a location where previous visa holders have entered breach;

      • The sponsor has a dubious status, or has sponsored people who have entered breach;

      • The sponsor attempts to attest to things that are beyond his control (like guaranteeing that the person will not overstay).

      Appeal



      All of the Schengen members offer a judicial remedy for a refusal, namely to appeal the decision. Each member has their own procedure and the particulars are too ponderous to cover here, but a refusal is accompanied with an explanation of how to proceed if the applicant wants to appeal. There is a great discussion about the decision to make an appeal here.



      Fresh Application



      The other option is to correct the deficiencies in your original application and apply again. This way is invariably faster and cheaper and there is no required interval or "cooling-off period" between successive applications. However, it's important to recognize that a fresh application made immediately after a refusal is a recipe for disaster when one of the refusal reasons is "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided". Before lodging a fresh application you need to understand precisely what brought about the refusal (especially if your credibility has been negatively assessed). For the best results, a fresh application should contain one or more of these...



      • An explanation of why you think the refusal happened;

      • An explanation of how your circumstances have changed since the refusal;

      • If the decision-maker relied upon an assumption that was adverse to you, then a brief clarification may be helpful;

      • If the decision-maker did not (apparently) examine evidence that was favourable to you, then a brief statement highlighting this may be helpful;

      • An itemized list of the evidence you are submitting to correct the problem(s) along with why you think each item will be helpful;

      Legal Counsel



      Understanding the various Schengen refusal formulae can be daunting. If you do not understand how "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" applies to your case, or you are unsure of what evidence you can use to have a better result, then it's advisable to arrange a consultation with a lawyer who operates a practice area in Schengen visas.



      The downside is that you may get scammed, especially if you are in Africa or South Asia. For this reason, a safe strategy is to instruct a lawyer who is licensed to practice in the member state you are applying to. Each member state operates a professional body that licenses lawyers and regulates their practice in accordance with EU standards.



      In Spain, for example, it is the CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA ABOGACÍA ESPAÑOLA



      In Belgium, One such organisation is the Ordre des barreaux francophones



      For others, you can use the search portal offered by The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).



      Note that lawyers of this calibre will attract a fee for their services.



      Combinations



      In some of the more egregious cases, a refusal will also have this reason: "Your intention to leave the territory of the member state before the expiry of visa could not be ascertained". In these cases, the decision-maker concluded that you were not a bona fide applicant.



      General Tips



      1. Tell the truth;

      2. Be sure your financial evidence contains movements that are well explained;

      3. Include all foreign travel in an itemized list;

      4. Be sure your visit is explained with a plausible itinerary;

      5. Don't make vacuous, inane promises about your intentions;

      6. Don't let your hosts make assurances about your intentions they can't keep;





      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        27
        down vote










        up vote
        27
        down vote









        When you see "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" on a Schengen refusal, it usually means that they decided that the application was either 'incoherent', or not credible, or both.



        Incoherence



        Coherence has a special meaning in the Schengen vocabulary; it means clear, sensible, consistent, and most importantly, understandable. An 'incoherent' application lacks these qualities. Coherent applications will generally succeed; incoherent applications will not. Some examples of incoherence are given in the handbook...



        • an applicant claims to travel to an industrial area, staying in a cheap hotel, for the purpose of tourism;

        • an applicant claims to visit a professional event at dates that do not correspond to the actual dates of the event;

        • an applicant claims that the purpose of the trip is to visit a friend, but it turns out that the person concerned is absent during that period;

        • a trader in jewellery claims to have been invited to attend a medical conference.

        While these examples may not correspond to your situation, they have a common thread where the application was not consistent with the applicant's job, status, or apparent life-style.



        Premise



        Incoherence also includes applications that did not successfully establish a premise for the visit. Commonly, there is no apparent connection between the applicant's itinerary and his career, apparent life-style, or financial capacity. Some examples of this are...



        • an applicant expresses interest in an event or geographic area for which there are no signs of previous interest;

        • an applicant presents a letter of invitation from a sponsor whose relationship with the applicant is unclear or distant;

        • an applicant is continually sponsored by the same person where there is no apparent justification for visiting that person;

        • an applicant cannot establish why a visit is contemplated at this particular time.

        Credibility



        An applicant's credibility can also result in a refusal reason of "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided".



        Some examples of credibility problems are...



        • The applicant has an existing support network of friends or family that would easily enable them to break the rules;

        • A disproportionate amount of income is being spent for the visit;

        • The applicant has changed stories over the course of several interactions with Schengen officials and their credibility has been damaged;

        • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds really belong to the applicant;

        • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds were obtained legally;

        • The applicant has a history of prior refusals and there is no visible change in circumstances;

        • The applicant's submission contains gaps or evidential shortfalls that cannot be explained;

        • The applicant is going to a location where previous visa holders have entered breach;

        • The sponsor has a dubious status, or has sponsored people who have entered breach;

        • The sponsor attempts to attest to things that are beyond his control (like guaranteeing that the person will not overstay).

        Appeal



        All of the Schengen members offer a judicial remedy for a refusal, namely to appeal the decision. Each member has their own procedure and the particulars are too ponderous to cover here, but a refusal is accompanied with an explanation of how to proceed if the applicant wants to appeal. There is a great discussion about the decision to make an appeal here.



        Fresh Application



        The other option is to correct the deficiencies in your original application and apply again. This way is invariably faster and cheaper and there is no required interval or "cooling-off period" between successive applications. However, it's important to recognize that a fresh application made immediately after a refusal is a recipe for disaster when one of the refusal reasons is "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided". Before lodging a fresh application you need to understand precisely what brought about the refusal (especially if your credibility has been negatively assessed). For the best results, a fresh application should contain one or more of these...



        • An explanation of why you think the refusal happened;

        • An explanation of how your circumstances have changed since the refusal;

        • If the decision-maker relied upon an assumption that was adverse to you, then a brief clarification may be helpful;

        • If the decision-maker did not (apparently) examine evidence that was favourable to you, then a brief statement highlighting this may be helpful;

        • An itemized list of the evidence you are submitting to correct the problem(s) along with why you think each item will be helpful;

        Legal Counsel



        Understanding the various Schengen refusal formulae can be daunting. If you do not understand how "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" applies to your case, or you are unsure of what evidence you can use to have a better result, then it's advisable to arrange a consultation with a lawyer who operates a practice area in Schengen visas.



        The downside is that you may get scammed, especially if you are in Africa or South Asia. For this reason, a safe strategy is to instruct a lawyer who is licensed to practice in the member state you are applying to. Each member state operates a professional body that licenses lawyers and regulates their practice in accordance with EU standards.



        In Spain, for example, it is the CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA ABOGACÍA ESPAÑOLA



        In Belgium, One such organisation is the Ordre des barreaux francophones



        For others, you can use the search portal offered by The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).



        Note that lawyers of this calibre will attract a fee for their services.



        Combinations



        In some of the more egregious cases, a refusal will also have this reason: "Your intention to leave the territory of the member state before the expiry of visa could not be ascertained". In these cases, the decision-maker concluded that you were not a bona fide applicant.



        General Tips



        1. Tell the truth;

        2. Be sure your financial evidence contains movements that are well explained;

        3. Include all foreign travel in an itemized list;

        4. Be sure your visit is explained with a plausible itinerary;

        5. Don't make vacuous, inane promises about your intentions;

        6. Don't let your hosts make assurances about your intentions they can't keep;





        share|improve this answer














        When you see "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" on a Schengen refusal, it usually means that they decided that the application was either 'incoherent', or not credible, or both.



        Incoherence



        Coherence has a special meaning in the Schengen vocabulary; it means clear, sensible, consistent, and most importantly, understandable. An 'incoherent' application lacks these qualities. Coherent applications will generally succeed; incoherent applications will not. Some examples of incoherence are given in the handbook...



        • an applicant claims to travel to an industrial area, staying in a cheap hotel, for the purpose of tourism;

        • an applicant claims to visit a professional event at dates that do not correspond to the actual dates of the event;

        • an applicant claims that the purpose of the trip is to visit a friend, but it turns out that the person concerned is absent during that period;

        • a trader in jewellery claims to have been invited to attend a medical conference.

        While these examples may not correspond to your situation, they have a common thread where the application was not consistent with the applicant's job, status, or apparent life-style.



        Premise



        Incoherence also includes applications that did not successfully establish a premise for the visit. Commonly, there is no apparent connection between the applicant's itinerary and his career, apparent life-style, or financial capacity. Some examples of this are...



        • an applicant expresses interest in an event or geographic area for which there are no signs of previous interest;

        • an applicant presents a letter of invitation from a sponsor whose relationship with the applicant is unclear or distant;

        • an applicant is continually sponsored by the same person where there is no apparent justification for visiting that person;

        • an applicant cannot establish why a visit is contemplated at this particular time.

        Credibility



        An applicant's credibility can also result in a refusal reason of "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided".



        Some examples of credibility problems are...



        • The applicant has an existing support network of friends or family that would easily enable them to break the rules;

        • A disproportionate amount of income is being spent for the visit;

        • The applicant has changed stories over the course of several interactions with Schengen officials and their credibility has been damaged;

        • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds really belong to the applicant;

        • The decision-maker cannot determine if the funds were obtained legally;

        • The applicant has a history of prior refusals and there is no visible change in circumstances;

        • The applicant's submission contains gaps or evidential shortfalls that cannot be explained;

        • The applicant is going to a location where previous visa holders have entered breach;

        • The sponsor has a dubious status, or has sponsored people who have entered breach;

        • The sponsor attempts to attest to things that are beyond his control (like guaranteeing that the person will not overstay).

        Appeal



        All of the Schengen members offer a judicial remedy for a refusal, namely to appeal the decision. Each member has their own procedure and the particulars are too ponderous to cover here, but a refusal is accompanied with an explanation of how to proceed if the applicant wants to appeal. There is a great discussion about the decision to make an appeal here.



        Fresh Application



        The other option is to correct the deficiencies in your original application and apply again. This way is invariably faster and cheaper and there is no required interval or "cooling-off period" between successive applications. However, it's important to recognize that a fresh application made immediately after a refusal is a recipe for disaster when one of the refusal reasons is "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided". Before lodging a fresh application you need to understand precisely what brought about the refusal (especially if your credibility has been negatively assessed). For the best results, a fresh application should contain one or more of these...



        • An explanation of why you think the refusal happened;

        • An explanation of how your circumstances have changed since the refusal;

        • If the decision-maker relied upon an assumption that was adverse to you, then a brief clarification may be helpful;

        • If the decision-maker did not (apparently) examine evidence that was favourable to you, then a brief statement highlighting this may be helpful;

        • An itemized list of the evidence you are submitting to correct the problem(s) along with why you think each item will be helpful;

        Legal Counsel



        Understanding the various Schengen refusal formulae can be daunting. If you do not understand how "Justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay was not provided" applies to your case, or you are unsure of what evidence you can use to have a better result, then it's advisable to arrange a consultation with a lawyer who operates a practice area in Schengen visas.



        The downside is that you may get scammed, especially if you are in Africa or South Asia. For this reason, a safe strategy is to instruct a lawyer who is licensed to practice in the member state you are applying to. Each member state operates a professional body that licenses lawyers and regulates their practice in accordance with EU standards.



        In Spain, for example, it is the CONSEJO GENERAL DE LA ABOGACÍA ESPAÑOLA



        In Belgium, One such organisation is the Ordre des barreaux francophones



        For others, you can use the search portal offered by The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).



        Note that lawyers of this calibre will attract a fee for their services.



        Combinations



        In some of the more egregious cases, a refusal will also have this reason: "Your intention to leave the territory of the member state before the expiry of visa could not be ascertained". In these cases, the decision-maker concluded that you were not a bona fide applicant.



        General Tips



        1. Tell the truth;

        2. Be sure your financial evidence contains movements that are well explained;

        3. Include all foreign travel in an itemized list;

        4. Be sure your visit is explained with a plausible itinerary;

        5. Don't make vacuous, inane promises about your intentions;

        6. Don't let your hosts make assurances about your intentions they can't keep;






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:52









        Community♦

        1




        1










        answered Aug 14 '15 at 14:11









        Gayot Fow

        74.1k20192371




        74.1k20192371















            protected by Community♦ Dec 10 '17 at 11:47



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Edmonton

            Crossroads (UK TV series)