Simulate mounted volume errors to cause read only










7















Few days ago we have encountered an unexpected error where one of the mounted drive on our RedHat linux machine became Read-Only. The issue was cause by the network outage in the datacenter.



Now I need to see if I can reproduce the same behavior where drive will be re-mounted as Read-Only while application is running.



I tried to remounted it was read-only but that didn't work because there are files that are opened (logs being written).



Is there a way to temporary cause the read-only if I have root access to the machine (but no access to the hypervisor).



That volume is mounted via /etc/fstab. Here is the record:



UUID=abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f / ext4 defaults 1 1
UUID=8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133 /opt/sunapp ext4 rw 0 2


Here are the output of few commands that shows details about our mounted drive. I can add more details as needed.



Output of fdisk -l



Disk /dev/vda: 268.4 GB, 268435456000 bytes, 524288000 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0008ba5f

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 524287966 262142959+ 83 Linux

Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes, 83886080 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Output of lsblk command:



NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vda 253:0 0 80G 0 disk
└─vda1 253:1 0 80G 0 part /
vdb 253:16 0 250G 0 disk /opt/sunup


Output of blkid command:



/dev/vda1: UUID="abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f" TYPE="ext4" 
/dev/sr0: UUID="2017-11-13-13-33-07-00" LABEL="config-2" TYPE="iso9660"
/dev/vdb: UUID="8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133" TYPE="ext4"


Output of parted -l command:



Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system). /dev/sr0
has been opened read-only.
Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label
Model: QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM (scsi)
Disk /dev/sr0: 461kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/2048B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:

Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vda: 268GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 268GB 268GB primary ext4 boot


Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: loop
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Flags
1 0.00B 42.9GB 42.9GB ext4









share|improve this question

















  • 1





    If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

    – 0andriy
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00















7















Few days ago we have encountered an unexpected error where one of the mounted drive on our RedHat linux machine became Read-Only. The issue was cause by the network outage in the datacenter.



Now I need to see if I can reproduce the same behavior where drive will be re-mounted as Read-Only while application is running.



I tried to remounted it was read-only but that didn't work because there are files that are opened (logs being written).



Is there a way to temporary cause the read-only if I have root access to the machine (but no access to the hypervisor).



That volume is mounted via /etc/fstab. Here is the record:



UUID=abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f / ext4 defaults 1 1
UUID=8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133 /opt/sunapp ext4 rw 0 2


Here are the output of few commands that shows details about our mounted drive. I can add more details as needed.



Output of fdisk -l



Disk /dev/vda: 268.4 GB, 268435456000 bytes, 524288000 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0008ba5f

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 524287966 262142959+ 83 Linux

Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes, 83886080 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Output of lsblk command:



NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vda 253:0 0 80G 0 disk
└─vda1 253:1 0 80G 0 part /
vdb 253:16 0 250G 0 disk /opt/sunup


Output of blkid command:



/dev/vda1: UUID="abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f" TYPE="ext4" 
/dev/sr0: UUID="2017-11-13-13-33-07-00" LABEL="config-2" TYPE="iso9660"
/dev/vdb: UUID="8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133" TYPE="ext4"


Output of parted -l command:



Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system). /dev/sr0
has been opened read-only.
Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label
Model: QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM (scsi)
Disk /dev/sr0: 461kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/2048B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:

Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vda: 268GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 268GB 268GB primary ext4 boot


Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: loop
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Flags
1 0.00B 42.9GB 42.9GB ext4









share|improve this question

















  • 1





    If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

    – 0andriy
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00













7












7








7








Few days ago we have encountered an unexpected error where one of the mounted drive on our RedHat linux machine became Read-Only. The issue was cause by the network outage in the datacenter.



Now I need to see if I can reproduce the same behavior where drive will be re-mounted as Read-Only while application is running.



I tried to remounted it was read-only but that didn't work because there are files that are opened (logs being written).



Is there a way to temporary cause the read-only if I have root access to the machine (but no access to the hypervisor).



That volume is mounted via /etc/fstab. Here is the record:



UUID=abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f / ext4 defaults 1 1
UUID=8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133 /opt/sunapp ext4 rw 0 2


Here are the output of few commands that shows details about our mounted drive. I can add more details as needed.



Output of fdisk -l



Disk /dev/vda: 268.4 GB, 268435456000 bytes, 524288000 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0008ba5f

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 524287966 262142959+ 83 Linux

Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes, 83886080 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Output of lsblk command:



NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vda 253:0 0 80G 0 disk
└─vda1 253:1 0 80G 0 part /
vdb 253:16 0 250G 0 disk /opt/sunup


Output of blkid command:



/dev/vda1: UUID="abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f" TYPE="ext4" 
/dev/sr0: UUID="2017-11-13-13-33-07-00" LABEL="config-2" TYPE="iso9660"
/dev/vdb: UUID="8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133" TYPE="ext4"


Output of parted -l command:



Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system). /dev/sr0
has been opened read-only.
Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label
Model: QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM (scsi)
Disk /dev/sr0: 461kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/2048B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:

Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vda: 268GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 268GB 268GB primary ext4 boot


Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: loop
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Flags
1 0.00B 42.9GB 42.9GB ext4









share|improve this question














Few days ago we have encountered an unexpected error where one of the mounted drive on our RedHat linux machine became Read-Only. The issue was cause by the network outage in the datacenter.



Now I need to see if I can reproduce the same behavior where drive will be re-mounted as Read-Only while application is running.



I tried to remounted it was read-only but that didn't work because there are files that are opened (logs being written).



Is there a way to temporary cause the read-only if I have root access to the machine (but no access to the hypervisor).



That volume is mounted via /etc/fstab. Here is the record:



UUID=abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f / ext4 defaults 1 1
UUID=8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133 /opt/sunapp ext4 rw 0 2


Here are the output of few commands that shows details about our mounted drive. I can add more details as needed.



Output of fdisk -l



Disk /dev/vda: 268.4 GB, 268435456000 bytes, 524288000 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0008ba5f

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/vda1 * 2048 524287966 262142959+ 83 Linux

Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9 GB, 42949672960 bytes, 83886080 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Output of lsblk command:



NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
vda 253:0 0 80G 0 disk
└─vda1 253:1 0 80G 0 part /
vdb 253:16 0 250G 0 disk /opt/sunup


Output of blkid command:



/dev/vda1: UUID="abfe2bbb-a8b6-4ae0-b8da-727cc788838f" TYPE="ext4" 
/dev/sr0: UUID="2017-11-13-13-33-07-00" LABEL="config-2" TYPE="iso9660"
/dev/vdb: UUID="8c828be6-bf54-4fe6-b68a-eec863d80133" TYPE="ext4"


Output of parted -l command:



Warning: Unable to open /dev/sr0 read-write (Read-only file system). /dev/sr0
has been opened read-only.
Error: /dev/sr0: unrecognised disk label
Model: QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM (scsi)
Disk /dev/sr0: 461kB
Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/2048B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:

Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vda: 268GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 268GB 268GB primary ext4 boot


Model: Virtio Block Device (virtblk)
Disk /dev/vdb: 42.9GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: loop
Disk Flags:

Number Start End Size File system Flags
1 0.00B 42.9GB 42.9GB ext4






linux linux-device-driver volume readonly






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 '18 at 17:24









MaksimMaksim

7,4062385125




7,4062385125







  • 1





    If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

    – 0andriy
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00












  • 1





    If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

    – 0andriy
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00







1




1





If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

– 0andriy
Nov 14 '18 at 23:00





If it would be so easy, it would be considered as a critical bug.

– 0andriy
Nov 14 '18 at 23:00












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4





+150









Yes, you can do it. But the method proposed here may cause data loss, so use it only for testing.



Supposing you have /dev/vdb mounted as /opt/sunapp, do this:



  1. First, unmount it. You may need to shut down any applications using it first.


  2. Configure a loop device to mirror the contents of /dev/vdb:



    losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/vdb



  3. Then, mount /dev/loop0 instead of /dev/vdb:



    mount /dev/loop0 /opt/sunapp -o rw,errors=remount-ro



  4. Now, you can run your application. When it is time to make /opt/sunapp read-only, use this command:



    blockdev --setro /dev/vdb


    After that, attempts to write to /dev/loop0 will result in I/O errors. As soon as file system driver detects this, it will remount the file system as read-only.



To restore everything back, you will need to unmount /opt/sunapp, detach the loop device, and make /dev/vdb writable again:



umount /opt/sunapp
losetup -d /dev/loop0
blockdev --setrw /dev/vdb





share|improve this answer






























    0














    When I had some issues like corrupted disks, I had used ntfsfix.
    Please see if these commands, solve the problem.



    sudo ntfsfix /dev/vda
    sudo ntfsfix /dev/vdb





    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

      – Maksim
      Nov 21 '18 at 18:49










    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267157%2fsimulate-mounted-volume-errors-to-cause-read-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4





    +150









    Yes, you can do it. But the method proposed here may cause data loss, so use it only for testing.



    Supposing you have /dev/vdb mounted as /opt/sunapp, do this:



    1. First, unmount it. You may need to shut down any applications using it first.


    2. Configure a loop device to mirror the contents of /dev/vdb:



      losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/vdb



    3. Then, mount /dev/loop0 instead of /dev/vdb:



      mount /dev/loop0 /opt/sunapp -o rw,errors=remount-ro



    4. Now, you can run your application. When it is time to make /opt/sunapp read-only, use this command:



      blockdev --setro /dev/vdb


      After that, attempts to write to /dev/loop0 will result in I/O errors. As soon as file system driver detects this, it will remount the file system as read-only.



    To restore everything back, you will need to unmount /opt/sunapp, detach the loop device, and make /dev/vdb writable again:



    umount /opt/sunapp
    losetup -d /dev/loop0
    blockdev --setrw /dev/vdb





    share|improve this answer



























      4





      +150









      Yes, you can do it. But the method proposed here may cause data loss, so use it only for testing.



      Supposing you have /dev/vdb mounted as /opt/sunapp, do this:



      1. First, unmount it. You may need to shut down any applications using it first.


      2. Configure a loop device to mirror the contents of /dev/vdb:



        losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/vdb



      3. Then, mount /dev/loop0 instead of /dev/vdb:



        mount /dev/loop0 /opt/sunapp -o rw,errors=remount-ro



      4. Now, you can run your application. When it is time to make /opt/sunapp read-only, use this command:



        blockdev --setro /dev/vdb


        After that, attempts to write to /dev/loop0 will result in I/O errors. As soon as file system driver detects this, it will remount the file system as read-only.



      To restore everything back, you will need to unmount /opt/sunapp, detach the loop device, and make /dev/vdb writable again:



      umount /opt/sunapp
      losetup -d /dev/loop0
      blockdev --setrw /dev/vdb





      share|improve this answer

























        4





        +150







        4





        +150



        4




        +150





        Yes, you can do it. But the method proposed here may cause data loss, so use it only for testing.



        Supposing you have /dev/vdb mounted as /opt/sunapp, do this:



        1. First, unmount it. You may need to shut down any applications using it first.


        2. Configure a loop device to mirror the contents of /dev/vdb:



          losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/vdb



        3. Then, mount /dev/loop0 instead of /dev/vdb:



          mount /dev/loop0 /opt/sunapp -o rw,errors=remount-ro



        4. Now, you can run your application. When it is time to make /opt/sunapp read-only, use this command:



          blockdev --setro /dev/vdb


          After that, attempts to write to /dev/loop0 will result in I/O errors. As soon as file system driver detects this, it will remount the file system as read-only.



        To restore everything back, you will need to unmount /opt/sunapp, detach the loop device, and make /dev/vdb writable again:



        umount /opt/sunapp
        losetup -d /dev/loop0
        blockdev --setrw /dev/vdb





        share|improve this answer













        Yes, you can do it. But the method proposed here may cause data loss, so use it only for testing.



        Supposing you have /dev/vdb mounted as /opt/sunapp, do this:



        1. First, unmount it. You may need to shut down any applications using it first.


        2. Configure a loop device to mirror the contents of /dev/vdb:



          losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/vdb



        3. Then, mount /dev/loop0 instead of /dev/vdb:



          mount /dev/loop0 /opt/sunapp -o rw,errors=remount-ro



        4. Now, you can run your application. When it is time to make /opt/sunapp read-only, use this command:



          blockdev --setro /dev/vdb


          After that, attempts to write to /dev/loop0 will result in I/O errors. As soon as file system driver detects this, it will remount the file system as read-only.



        To restore everything back, you will need to unmount /opt/sunapp, detach the loop device, and make /dev/vdb writable again:



        umount /opt/sunapp
        losetup -d /dev/loop0
        blockdev --setrw /dev/vdb






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 16 '18 at 19:23









        abacabadabacabaabacabadabacaba

        2,3641715




        2,3641715























            0














            When I had some issues like corrupted disks, I had used ntfsfix.
            Please see if these commands, solve the problem.



            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vda
            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vdb





            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

              – Maksim
              Nov 21 '18 at 18:49















            0














            When I had some issues like corrupted disks, I had used ntfsfix.
            Please see if these commands, solve the problem.



            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vda
            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vdb





            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

              – Maksim
              Nov 21 '18 at 18:49













            0












            0








            0







            When I had some issues like corrupted disks, I had used ntfsfix.
            Please see if these commands, solve the problem.



            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vda
            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vdb





            share|improve this answer













            When I had some issues like corrupted disks, I had used ntfsfix.
            Please see if these commands, solve the problem.



            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vda
            sudo ntfsfix /dev/vdb






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 21 '18 at 16:13









            Sreeragh A RSreeragh A R

            1,1291231




            1,1291231







            • 1





              This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

              – Maksim
              Nov 21 '18 at 18:49












            • 1





              This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

              – Maksim
              Nov 21 '18 at 18:49







            1




            1





            This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

            – Maksim
            Nov 21 '18 at 18:49





            This tool is used to correct/fix NTFS file system, in my case FS is different, and I don't want to fix error but to cause error that will result in read-only mode

            – Maksim
            Nov 21 '18 at 18:49

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53267157%2fsimulate-mounted-volume-errors-to-cause-read-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

            Edmonton

            Crossroads (UK TV series)