Java script how to construct an object using variables

Java script how to construct an object using variables



I'm working on express.js framework and sequlize.js orm.



I get the region and the type from the back-end.



Using those two variables I want to construct an object to pass to the sequlize orm.




let region_id = req.swagger.params.region_id.value;
let type = req.swagger.params.type.value;

console.log("REGION", region_id) // will output 4,5,6,... etc
console.log("TYPE", type) // will output is_lunch,is_dinner,... etc



That was my variables.



This is my object




const prepared_query =
where:
,
attributes: ['price'],
include: [
model: db.restaurants,
attributes: ['region_id'],
where:
region_id: ''

]


prepared_query.include[0].where.region_id = region_id;
prepared_query.where[type] = true;


prepared_query.include[0].where.region_id = region_id;



successfully replaced the region_id as 4. but


prepared_query.where[type] = true;



is not gives me is_lunch:true' instead it gives me Cannot set property 'is_lunch' of undefined


is_lunch:true'


Cannot set property 'is_lunch' of undefined



HOW DO I ACHIEVE THIS USING JAVA SCRIPT?





Possible duplicate of Dynamically access object property using variable
– Nisarg Shah
Sep 5 '18 at 9:20





@NisargShah I don't think so.
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 9:25





You should try doing prepared_query[type] = true; Let me know if that doesn't work.
– Nisarg Shah
Sep 5 '18 at 9:25


prepared_query[type] = true;





I update my question
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 9:47





@NisargShah Thanks a lot. I din't heard this thing before =)
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 10:10




2 Answers
2



you can do this.


prepared_query.include[0].where.region_id = region_id;
prepared_query[type] = true;

object.property = value;

//static
"property": value;

object[property] = value;

//dynamic
[property]: value;



read this page: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Property_Accessors





I update my question.
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 9:48





Thanks a lot. I din't heard this thing before =)
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 10:10





@PathumSamararathna this is async problem, so you use await - async async ajaxfunction() .. res = await getResponse()
– seunggabi
Sep 5 '18 at 10:15



await - async





Now it's worked as expected!
– Pathum Samararathna
Sep 5 '18 at 10:18



I didn't set anything to the prepared_query.where was the problem here.


prepared_query.where


prepared_query.where = ;
prepared_query.where[type] = true



Gives me the correct output.



Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.



Please pay close attention to the following guidance:



But avoid



To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.



Required, but never shown



Required, but never shown




By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)