Does a long flight on a jet provide a headstart to altitude acclimatisation?










10















Would a long flight, such as across the Pacific, provide a headstart to altitude acclimatisation?










share|improve this question




























    10















    Would a long flight, such as across the Pacific, provide a headstart to altitude acclimatisation?










    share|improve this question


























      10












      10








      10








      Would a long flight, such as across the Pacific, provide a headstart to altitude acclimatisation?










      share|improve this question
















      Would a long flight, such as across the Pacific, provide a headstart to altitude acclimatisation?







      air-travel altitude






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 1 '16 at 11:54









      JonathanReez

      48.8k38232495




      48.8k38232495










      asked Nov 1 '16 at 11:44









      WW.WW.

      2,18012050




      2,18012050




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14














          I'm pretty sure the effect can be neglected for passengers.



          The first reaction of the human body to lower air pressure is deeper, faster breathing and a higher heart rate.
          On the other side, passengers are only sitting around, doing quite nothing. This leads to lower heart rate and slower breathing.
          Putting both together, passengers breathe a little faster than normal when sitting, but not heavy, and the body does not really encounter a lack of oxygen. There's simply no trigger for any acclimatisation.



          Even if, the body mainly reacts by producing more red blood cells. This takes many days to weeks, and even an 18h flight would not be enough.



          Finally, typical cabin pressure corresponds to altitudes in the region of 2000m and below, which is not that high.



          So there should be no effect on the passengers, and may be a little effect on the flight attendants.






          share|improve this answer






























            13














            Not really, the effect is neglectable. There are two main reasons:



            • The altitude is not high enough. Typically the cabin is pressurised to an altitude in the range of 1500-2000 meters (source and matches with what I measured with an altimeter during flights). In that range the need for acclimatisation is not very big, unless you would like to perform competitively in sports at that altitude.

            • The time is too short. Even flights across the Pacific will be something like 12h. Such a short time is rather irrelevant, especially if you land and spend time at a lower altitude after the flight.

            According to me, any positive acclimatisation effects will be offset by the negative effects of spending all that time in an uncomfortable position with a lack of movement.






            share|improve this answer























            • What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

              – JonathanReez
              Nov 1 '16 at 12:44






            • 1





              @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

              – Some wandering yeti
              Nov 1 '16 at 13:31











            • I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

              – WW.
              Nov 3 '16 at 4:23


















            6














            Does it contribute, yes. Will the difference be noticeable, no.



            Proper acclimatization requires you to spend several days at each of several intermediate altitudes before reaching your target altitude. That is why climbing expeditions walk in and then set up several climbing camps working their way up the mountain. They get used to each higher level for several days before moving to the next higher.



            If you are hopping a plane from Sydney to Kathmandu, then those hours count towards getting used to Kathmandu's altitude, but contribute nothing really towards acclimatizing for Namche Bazaar. Of course that assumes you fly to Kathmandu, if you stop off in Bangkok for a few days before heading to KTM the slight gain is lost.



            Bottom line there is no real short cut to acclimatization, it takes time, from a few days to a month or more. Each person reacts differently to altitude, so there is no magic bullet that works for all. Best bet is to build the necessary time into your plans or bring medicines to help ease the altitude issues (or both).






            share|improve this answer

























            • Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

              – JohnP
              Nov 1 '16 at 18:33










            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "273"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81798%2fdoes-a-long-flight-on-a-jet-provide-a-headstart-to-altitude-acclimatisation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            14














            I'm pretty sure the effect can be neglected for passengers.



            The first reaction of the human body to lower air pressure is deeper, faster breathing and a higher heart rate.
            On the other side, passengers are only sitting around, doing quite nothing. This leads to lower heart rate and slower breathing.
            Putting both together, passengers breathe a little faster than normal when sitting, but not heavy, and the body does not really encounter a lack of oxygen. There's simply no trigger for any acclimatisation.



            Even if, the body mainly reacts by producing more red blood cells. This takes many days to weeks, and even an 18h flight would not be enough.



            Finally, typical cabin pressure corresponds to altitudes in the region of 2000m and below, which is not that high.



            So there should be no effect on the passengers, and may be a little effect on the flight attendants.






            share|improve this answer



























              14














              I'm pretty sure the effect can be neglected for passengers.



              The first reaction of the human body to lower air pressure is deeper, faster breathing and a higher heart rate.
              On the other side, passengers are only sitting around, doing quite nothing. This leads to lower heart rate and slower breathing.
              Putting both together, passengers breathe a little faster than normal when sitting, but not heavy, and the body does not really encounter a lack of oxygen. There's simply no trigger for any acclimatisation.



              Even if, the body mainly reacts by producing more red blood cells. This takes many days to weeks, and even an 18h flight would not be enough.



              Finally, typical cabin pressure corresponds to altitudes in the region of 2000m and below, which is not that high.



              So there should be no effect on the passengers, and may be a little effect on the flight attendants.






              share|improve this answer

























                14












                14








                14







                I'm pretty sure the effect can be neglected for passengers.



                The first reaction of the human body to lower air pressure is deeper, faster breathing and a higher heart rate.
                On the other side, passengers are only sitting around, doing quite nothing. This leads to lower heart rate and slower breathing.
                Putting both together, passengers breathe a little faster than normal when sitting, but not heavy, and the body does not really encounter a lack of oxygen. There's simply no trigger for any acclimatisation.



                Even if, the body mainly reacts by producing more red blood cells. This takes many days to weeks, and even an 18h flight would not be enough.



                Finally, typical cabin pressure corresponds to altitudes in the region of 2000m and below, which is not that high.



                So there should be no effect on the passengers, and may be a little effect on the flight attendants.






                share|improve this answer













                I'm pretty sure the effect can be neglected for passengers.



                The first reaction of the human body to lower air pressure is deeper, faster breathing and a higher heart rate.
                On the other side, passengers are only sitting around, doing quite nothing. This leads to lower heart rate and slower breathing.
                Putting both together, passengers breathe a little faster than normal when sitting, but not heavy, and the body does not really encounter a lack of oxygen. There's simply no trigger for any acclimatisation.



                Even if, the body mainly reacts by producing more red blood cells. This takes many days to weeks, and even an 18h flight would not be enough.



                Finally, typical cabin pressure corresponds to altitudes in the region of 2000m and below, which is not that high.



                So there should be no effect on the passengers, and may be a little effect on the flight attendants.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 1 '16 at 12:55









                swebersweber

                1,145612




                1,145612























                    13














                    Not really, the effect is neglectable. There are two main reasons:



                    • The altitude is not high enough. Typically the cabin is pressurised to an altitude in the range of 1500-2000 meters (source and matches with what I measured with an altimeter during flights). In that range the need for acclimatisation is not very big, unless you would like to perform competitively in sports at that altitude.

                    • The time is too short. Even flights across the Pacific will be something like 12h. Such a short time is rather irrelevant, especially if you land and spend time at a lower altitude after the flight.

                    According to me, any positive acclimatisation effects will be offset by the negative effects of spending all that time in an uncomfortable position with a lack of movement.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                      – JonathanReez
                      Nov 1 '16 at 12:44






                    • 1





                      @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                      – Some wandering yeti
                      Nov 1 '16 at 13:31











                    • I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                      – WW.
                      Nov 3 '16 at 4:23















                    13














                    Not really, the effect is neglectable. There are two main reasons:



                    • The altitude is not high enough. Typically the cabin is pressurised to an altitude in the range of 1500-2000 meters (source and matches with what I measured with an altimeter during flights). In that range the need for acclimatisation is not very big, unless you would like to perform competitively in sports at that altitude.

                    • The time is too short. Even flights across the Pacific will be something like 12h. Such a short time is rather irrelevant, especially if you land and spend time at a lower altitude after the flight.

                    According to me, any positive acclimatisation effects will be offset by the negative effects of spending all that time in an uncomfortable position with a lack of movement.






                    share|improve this answer























                    • What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                      – JonathanReez
                      Nov 1 '16 at 12:44






                    • 1





                      @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                      – Some wandering yeti
                      Nov 1 '16 at 13:31











                    • I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                      – WW.
                      Nov 3 '16 at 4:23













                    13












                    13








                    13







                    Not really, the effect is neglectable. There are two main reasons:



                    • The altitude is not high enough. Typically the cabin is pressurised to an altitude in the range of 1500-2000 meters (source and matches with what I measured with an altimeter during flights). In that range the need for acclimatisation is not very big, unless you would like to perform competitively in sports at that altitude.

                    • The time is too short. Even flights across the Pacific will be something like 12h. Such a short time is rather irrelevant, especially if you land and spend time at a lower altitude after the flight.

                    According to me, any positive acclimatisation effects will be offset by the negative effects of spending all that time in an uncomfortable position with a lack of movement.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Not really, the effect is neglectable. There are two main reasons:



                    • The altitude is not high enough. Typically the cabin is pressurised to an altitude in the range of 1500-2000 meters (source and matches with what I measured with an altimeter during flights). In that range the need for acclimatisation is not very big, unless you would like to perform competitively in sports at that altitude.

                    • The time is too short. Even flights across the Pacific will be something like 12h. Such a short time is rather irrelevant, especially if you land and spend time at a lower altitude after the flight.

                    According to me, any positive acclimatisation effects will be offset by the negative effects of spending all that time in an uncomfortable position with a lack of movement.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 1 '16 at 12:27









                    Some wandering yetiSome wandering yeti

                    7,4123250




                    7,4123250












                    • What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                      – JonathanReez
                      Nov 1 '16 at 12:44






                    • 1





                      @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                      – Some wandering yeti
                      Nov 1 '16 at 13:31











                    • I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                      – WW.
                      Nov 3 '16 at 4:23

















                    • What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                      – JonathanReez
                      Nov 1 '16 at 12:44






                    • 1





                      @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                      – Some wandering yeti
                      Nov 1 '16 at 13:31











                    • I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                      – WW.
                      Nov 3 '16 at 4:23
















                    What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                    – JonathanReez
                    Nov 1 '16 at 12:44





                    What if they're flying straight to e.g. Quito?

                    – JonathanReez
                    Nov 1 '16 at 12:44




                    1




                    1





                    @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                    – Some wandering yeti
                    Nov 1 '16 at 13:31





                    @JonathanReez acclimatise in Quito, not in the plane.

                    – Some wandering yeti
                    Nov 1 '16 at 13:31













                    I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                    – WW.
                    Nov 3 '16 at 4:23





                    I was asking regarding SYD-AKL-SCL-LIM-CUZ. I was wondering if all that flying would help for Cuzco which is at 3,400m.

                    – WW.
                    Nov 3 '16 at 4:23











                    6














                    Does it contribute, yes. Will the difference be noticeable, no.



                    Proper acclimatization requires you to spend several days at each of several intermediate altitudes before reaching your target altitude. That is why climbing expeditions walk in and then set up several climbing camps working their way up the mountain. They get used to each higher level for several days before moving to the next higher.



                    If you are hopping a plane from Sydney to Kathmandu, then those hours count towards getting used to Kathmandu's altitude, but contribute nothing really towards acclimatizing for Namche Bazaar. Of course that assumes you fly to Kathmandu, if you stop off in Bangkok for a few days before heading to KTM the slight gain is lost.



                    Bottom line there is no real short cut to acclimatization, it takes time, from a few days to a month or more. Each person reacts differently to altitude, so there is no magic bullet that works for all. Best bet is to build the necessary time into your plans or bring medicines to help ease the altitude issues (or both).






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                      – JohnP
                      Nov 1 '16 at 18:33















                    6














                    Does it contribute, yes. Will the difference be noticeable, no.



                    Proper acclimatization requires you to spend several days at each of several intermediate altitudes before reaching your target altitude. That is why climbing expeditions walk in and then set up several climbing camps working their way up the mountain. They get used to each higher level for several days before moving to the next higher.



                    If you are hopping a plane from Sydney to Kathmandu, then those hours count towards getting used to Kathmandu's altitude, but contribute nothing really towards acclimatizing for Namche Bazaar. Of course that assumes you fly to Kathmandu, if you stop off in Bangkok for a few days before heading to KTM the slight gain is lost.



                    Bottom line there is no real short cut to acclimatization, it takes time, from a few days to a month or more. Each person reacts differently to altitude, so there is no magic bullet that works for all. Best bet is to build the necessary time into your plans or bring medicines to help ease the altitude issues (or both).






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                      – JohnP
                      Nov 1 '16 at 18:33













                    6












                    6








                    6







                    Does it contribute, yes. Will the difference be noticeable, no.



                    Proper acclimatization requires you to spend several days at each of several intermediate altitudes before reaching your target altitude. That is why climbing expeditions walk in and then set up several climbing camps working their way up the mountain. They get used to each higher level for several days before moving to the next higher.



                    If you are hopping a plane from Sydney to Kathmandu, then those hours count towards getting used to Kathmandu's altitude, but contribute nothing really towards acclimatizing for Namche Bazaar. Of course that assumes you fly to Kathmandu, if you stop off in Bangkok for a few days before heading to KTM the slight gain is lost.



                    Bottom line there is no real short cut to acclimatization, it takes time, from a few days to a month or more. Each person reacts differently to altitude, so there is no magic bullet that works for all. Best bet is to build the necessary time into your plans or bring medicines to help ease the altitude issues (or both).






                    share|improve this answer















                    Does it contribute, yes. Will the difference be noticeable, no.



                    Proper acclimatization requires you to spend several days at each of several intermediate altitudes before reaching your target altitude. That is why climbing expeditions walk in and then set up several climbing camps working their way up the mountain. They get used to each higher level for several days before moving to the next higher.



                    If you are hopping a plane from Sydney to Kathmandu, then those hours count towards getting used to Kathmandu's altitude, but contribute nothing really towards acclimatizing for Namche Bazaar. Of course that assumes you fly to Kathmandu, if you stop off in Bangkok for a few days before heading to KTM the slight gain is lost.



                    Bottom line there is no real short cut to acclimatization, it takes time, from a few days to a month or more. Each person reacts differently to altitude, so there is no magic bullet that works for all. Best bet is to build the necessary time into your plans or bring medicines to help ease the altitude issues (or both).







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 1 '16 at 14:26

























                    answered Nov 1 '16 at 13:26







                    user13044



















                    • Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                      – JohnP
                      Nov 1 '16 at 18:33

















                    • Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                      – JohnP
                      Nov 1 '16 at 18:33
















                    Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                    – JohnP
                    Nov 1 '16 at 18:33





                    Part of the acclimation process is the body starts producing more red blood cells. That is the biggest reason for the long process.

                    – JohnP
                    Nov 1 '16 at 18:33

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81798%2fdoes-a-long-flight-on-a-jet-provide-a-headstart-to-altitude-acclimatisation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                    Edmonton

                    Crossroads (UK TV series)