Can't get HTTP PUT-request to work in Asp.Net Core










1















I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.



This is controller in ASP.net:



[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)

result = update;
context.SaveChanges();

return Created("", result);



And this is the code I use in Angular:



url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;

putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);



Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.










share|improve this question
























  • Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

    – paulsm4
    Nov 10 '18 at 23:59















1















I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.



This is controller in ASP.net:



[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)

result = update;
context.SaveChanges();

return Created("", result);



And this is the code I use in Angular:



url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;

putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);



Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.










share|improve this question
























  • Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

    – paulsm4
    Nov 10 '18 at 23:59













1












1








1


1






I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.



This is controller in ASP.net:



[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)

result = update;
context.SaveChanges();

return Created("", result);



And this is the code I use in Angular:



url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;

putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);



Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.



This is controller in ASP.net:



[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)

result = update;
context.SaveChanges();

return Created("", result);



And this is the code I use in Angular:



url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;

putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);



Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.







c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 11 '18 at 12:43







MyNameIsGuzse

















asked Nov 10 '18 at 23:48









MyNameIsGuzseMyNameIsGuzse

5110




5110












  • Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

    – paulsm4
    Nov 10 '18 at 23:59

















  • Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

    – paulsm4
    Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
















Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59





Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?

– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation



Assuming the game id is an integer review the following



//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...



Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core



I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.






share|improve this answer























  • Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

    – Gabriel Luci
    Nov 11 '18 at 1:07











  • I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

    – MyNameIsGuzse
    Nov 11 '18 at 12:42











  • As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

    – Andre Artus
    Nov 11 '18 at 12:54


















1














If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object



[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...



If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2



Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Can you modify your defining route just like



    [Route("game")]
    [HttpPut]
    public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

    //your code



    And call from angular like



    putGame(game:Game)
    return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);



    you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244551%2fcant-get-http-put-request-to-work-in-asp-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation



      Assuming the game id is an integer review the following



      //PUT .../game/5
      [Route("game/id:int")]
      [HttpPut]
      public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
      //...



      Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core



      I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.






      share|improve this answer























      • Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

        – Gabriel Luci
        Nov 11 '18 at 1:07











      • I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

        – MyNameIsGuzse
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:42











      • As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

        – Andre Artus
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:54















      1














      The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation



      Assuming the game id is an integer review the following



      //PUT .../game/5
      [Route("game/id:int")]
      [HttpPut]
      public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
      //...



      Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core



      I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.






      share|improve this answer























      • Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

        – Gabriel Luci
        Nov 11 '18 at 1:07











      • I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

        – MyNameIsGuzse
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:42











      • As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

        – Andre Artus
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:54













      1












      1








      1







      The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation



      Assuming the game id is an integer review the following



      //PUT .../game/5
      [Route("game/id:int")]
      [HttpPut]
      public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
      //...



      Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core



      I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.






      share|improve this answer













      The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation



      Assuming the game id is an integer review the following



      //PUT .../game/5
      [Route("game/id:int")]
      [HttpPut]
      public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
      //...



      Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core



      I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Nov 11 '18 at 0:10









      NkosiNkosi

      113k16124190




      113k16124190












      • Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

        – Gabriel Luci
        Nov 11 '18 at 1:07











      • I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

        – MyNameIsGuzse
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:42











      • As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

        – Andre Artus
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:54

















      • Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

        – Gabriel Luci
        Nov 11 '18 at 1:07











      • I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

        – MyNameIsGuzse
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:42











      • As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

        – Andre Artus
        Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
















      Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

      – Gabriel Luci
      Nov 11 '18 at 1:07





      Yup. result = update doesn't do what you think it does.

      – Gabriel Luci
      Nov 11 '18 at 1:07













      I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

      – MyNameIsGuzse
      Nov 11 '18 at 12:42





      I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.

      – MyNameIsGuzse
      Nov 11 '18 at 12:42













      As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

      – Andre Artus
      Nov 11 '18 at 12:54





      As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.

      – Andre Artus
      Nov 11 '18 at 12:54













      1














      If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object



      [HttpPut("game/id")]
      public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
      //...



      If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2



      Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!






      share|improve this answer



























        1














        If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object



        [HttpPut("game/id")]
        public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
        //...



        If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2



        Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!






        share|improve this answer

























          1












          1








          1







          If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object



          [HttpPut("game/id")]
          public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
          //...



          If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2



          Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!






          share|improve this answer













          If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object



          [HttpPut("game/id")]
          public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
          //...



          If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2



          Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 11 '18 at 5:09









          RahulRahul

          1,0331315




          1,0331315





















              0














              Can you modify your defining route just like



              [Route("game")]
              [HttpPut]
              public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

              //your code



              And call from angular like



              putGame(game:Game)
              return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);



              you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                Can you modify your defining route just like



                [Route("game")]
                [HttpPut]
                public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

                //your code



                And call from angular like



                putGame(game:Game)
                return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);



                you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Can you modify your defining route just like



                  [Route("game")]
                  [HttpPut]
                  public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

                  //your code



                  And call from angular like



                  putGame(game:Game)
                  return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);



                  you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url






                  share|improve this answer













                  Can you modify your defining route just like



                  [Route("game")]
                  [HttpPut]
                  public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)

                  //your code



                  And call from angular like



                  putGame(game:Game)
                  return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);



                  you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 11 '18 at 2:10









                  Md. Abdul AlimMd. Abdul Alim

                  349215




                  349215



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244551%2fcant-get-http-put-request-to-work-in-asp-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

                      ャフサォクコ ケウ,コ,ワ メ,ロスョノ゙,クネ,フムカヤヲニ,エコ゚ツ ウイオン゙ケワサネォキモュキォウイノンコチ゚メヌナイゥフュ,カヒウネェ ネ,ホノケ,ムュキ ッボーミュハ,チ ツス ィ メウイマヤ,゙ウチ ヅ ロ,ォジヌェ ャヌット ェ,マャ,チナエヒネソキツテ トホヲヲミーァ

                      Node.js puppeteer - Use values from array in a loop to cycle through pages