Can't get HTTP PUT-request to work in Asp.Net Core
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
add a comment |
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
edited Nov 11 '18 at 12:43
MyNameIsGuzse
asked Nov 10 '18 at 23:48
MyNameIsGuzseMyNameIsGuzse
5110
5110
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = updatedoesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
add a comment |
If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244551%2fcant-get-http-put-request-to-work-in-asp-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = updatedoesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
add a comment |
The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = updatedoesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
add a comment |
The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
The route template parameter update.GameID is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
answered Nov 11 '18 at 0:10
NkosiNkosi
113k16124190
113k16124190
Yup.result = updatedoesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
add a comment |
Yup.result = updatedoesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
Yup.
result = update doesn't do what you think it does.– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
Yup.
result = update doesn't do what you think it does.– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 '18 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on
updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on
updateGame() and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 '18 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 '18 at 12:54
add a comment |
If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
If you are using PUT request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
answered Nov 11 '18 at 5:09
RahulRahul
1,0331315
1,0331315
add a comment |
add a comment |
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
answered Nov 11 '18 at 2:10
Md. Abdul AlimMd. Abdul Alim
349215
349215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244551%2fcant-get-http-put-request-to-work-in-asp-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 '18 at 23:59