Finite-dimensional faithful unitary representations of SL(2,Z)










10














Does $SL(2,mathbbZ)$ have a finite-dimensional faithful unitary representation? No such representation exists for $SL(2,mathbbR)$, but I don't see a reason why one shouldn't exist for $SL(2,mathbbZ)$.










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:31











  • Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
    – DanielHarlow
    Aug 24 at 19:38






  • 4




    $SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:42






  • 4




    @YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 24 at 20:21















10














Does $SL(2,mathbbZ)$ have a finite-dimensional faithful unitary representation? No such representation exists for $SL(2,mathbbR)$, but I don't see a reason why one shouldn't exist for $SL(2,mathbbZ)$.










share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:31











  • Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
    – DanielHarlow
    Aug 24 at 19:38






  • 4




    $SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:42






  • 4




    @YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 24 at 20:21













10












10








10


1





Does $SL(2,mathbbZ)$ have a finite-dimensional faithful unitary representation? No such representation exists for $SL(2,mathbbR)$, but I don't see a reason why one shouldn't exist for $SL(2,mathbbZ)$.










share|cite|improve this question













Does $SL(2,mathbbZ)$ have a finite-dimensional faithful unitary representation? No such representation exists for $SL(2,mathbbR)$, but I don't see a reason why one shouldn't exist for $SL(2,mathbbZ)$.







gr.group-theory rt.representation-theory unitary-representations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 24 at 19:08









DanielHarlow

1178




1178







  • 1




    The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:31











  • Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
    – DanielHarlow
    Aug 24 at 19:38






  • 4




    $SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:42






  • 4




    @YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 24 at 20:21












  • 1




    The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:31











  • Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
    – DanielHarlow
    Aug 24 at 19:38






  • 4




    $SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
    – YCor
    Aug 24 at 19:42






  • 4




    @YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 24 at 20:21







1




1




The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
– YCor
Aug 24 at 19:31





The answer is certainly yes; there should even be a faithful representation into $SU(2)$. On the other hand there's no faithful finite-dimensional unitary representation of $SL(3,mathbfZ)$.
– YCor
Aug 24 at 19:31













Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
– DanielHarlow
Aug 24 at 19:38




Thanks. Do you mind saying something about how such representations are constructed or providing a reference?
– DanielHarlow
Aug 24 at 19:38




4




4




$SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
– YCor
Aug 24 at 19:42




$SL(2,Z)$ is the amalgam $<u,v,z|u^3=v^2=z,z^2=1>$. So I'd take $v$ the diagonal matrix $(i,-i)$ (so $z=-1$) and I'd take for $v$ a random conjugate (in $SU(2)$) of the diagonal matrix $(t,t^-1)$, where $t=exp(2ipi/6)$. This is not a complete proof but an expectation, that for a generic conjugate they indeed generate the amalgam.
– YCor
Aug 24 at 19:42




4




4




@YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
– Ian Agol
Aug 24 at 20:21




@YCor's suggestion works - one can prove a faithful action of $SL(2,Z)$ on the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to $SU(2)$ for the representation variety, and then restrict to a generic value to get a faithful representation. But I'll point out that low-dimensional representations are classified in this paper: mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1815266
– Ian Agol
Aug 24 at 20:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














Here a non-explicit proof of the existence of a faithful representation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(2)$, using basic algebraic geometry and topology, and relying on the amalgam decomposition of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$.



[The basic idea is that if all representations in $mathrmSU(2)$ were non-faithful, by Zariski-density this would also be the case for representations into $mathrmSL_2$. We need to use the particular form of the presentation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$, since the argument will not carry over representations of $mathrmSL_3(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(3)$.]



Let $P_t$ be the set of $2times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 and trace $t$. Both $P_0$ and $P_1$ are irreducible as algebraic varieties (being $mathrmSL_2$ conjugacy classes). Then for $K$ a field of characteristic zero, $P_0(K)$ is the set of elements of order 4 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$, and $P_1(K)$ is the set of elements of order 6 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$.



For every $(g,h)in P_0times P_1$, $g^2=h^3$ equals $-I_2$. Hence the set of representations of $$mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)=langle u,vmid u^4=v^6=[u^2,v]=[u,v^3]=1rangle$$ (restricting to those for which the image of $u$ has order 4 and the order of $v$ has order 6)
into $mathrmSL_2(K)$ can be naturally identified to $(P_0times P_1)(K)$. Note that $P_0times P_1$ is irreducible.



Write $P_t^sharp=P_t(mathbfC)capmathrmSU(2)$. Then using that $mathrmSU(2)$ is Zariski-dense in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$ and describing $P_t(mathbfC)$ as a conjugacy class, one deduces that $P_t^sharp$ is Zariski-dense in $P_t(mathbfC)$. So $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ (which is a 4-dimensional real manifold) is Zariski-dense in $(P_0times P_1)(mathbfC)$.



For every given nontrivial element $w$ in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ the set of representations vanishing on $w$ is a proper subvariety of $P_0times P_1$, hence has dimension $le 3$. By Zariski density of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$, we deduce that its intersection with $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ is a proper Zariski closed subset (because $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ admits one faithful representation into $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$, the standard one); in particular it has empty interior (in the ordinary topology). By the Baire theorem, the union over all $w$ is still a proper subset. Hence we deduce the existence of an element of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ defining a faithful representation.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 6




    Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
    – Uri Bader
    Aug 25 at 8:54










  • @UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
    – YCor
    Aug 25 at 9:25










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f309050%2ffinite-dimensional-faithful-unitary-representations-of-sl2-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














Here a non-explicit proof of the existence of a faithful representation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(2)$, using basic algebraic geometry and topology, and relying on the amalgam decomposition of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$.



[The basic idea is that if all representations in $mathrmSU(2)$ were non-faithful, by Zariski-density this would also be the case for representations into $mathrmSL_2$. We need to use the particular form of the presentation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$, since the argument will not carry over representations of $mathrmSL_3(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(3)$.]



Let $P_t$ be the set of $2times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 and trace $t$. Both $P_0$ and $P_1$ are irreducible as algebraic varieties (being $mathrmSL_2$ conjugacy classes). Then for $K$ a field of characteristic zero, $P_0(K)$ is the set of elements of order 4 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$, and $P_1(K)$ is the set of elements of order 6 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$.



For every $(g,h)in P_0times P_1$, $g^2=h^3$ equals $-I_2$. Hence the set of representations of $$mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)=langle u,vmid u^4=v^6=[u^2,v]=[u,v^3]=1rangle$$ (restricting to those for which the image of $u$ has order 4 and the order of $v$ has order 6)
into $mathrmSL_2(K)$ can be naturally identified to $(P_0times P_1)(K)$. Note that $P_0times P_1$ is irreducible.



Write $P_t^sharp=P_t(mathbfC)capmathrmSU(2)$. Then using that $mathrmSU(2)$ is Zariski-dense in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$ and describing $P_t(mathbfC)$ as a conjugacy class, one deduces that $P_t^sharp$ is Zariski-dense in $P_t(mathbfC)$. So $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ (which is a 4-dimensional real manifold) is Zariski-dense in $(P_0times P_1)(mathbfC)$.



For every given nontrivial element $w$ in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ the set of representations vanishing on $w$ is a proper subvariety of $P_0times P_1$, hence has dimension $le 3$. By Zariski density of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$, we deduce that its intersection with $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ is a proper Zariski closed subset (because $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ admits one faithful representation into $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$, the standard one); in particular it has empty interior (in the ordinary topology). By the Baire theorem, the union over all $w$ is still a proper subset. Hence we deduce the existence of an element of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ defining a faithful representation.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 6




    Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
    – Uri Bader
    Aug 25 at 8:54










  • @UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
    – YCor
    Aug 25 at 9:25















18














Here a non-explicit proof of the existence of a faithful representation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(2)$, using basic algebraic geometry and topology, and relying on the amalgam decomposition of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$.



[The basic idea is that if all representations in $mathrmSU(2)$ were non-faithful, by Zariski-density this would also be the case for representations into $mathrmSL_2$. We need to use the particular form of the presentation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$, since the argument will not carry over representations of $mathrmSL_3(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(3)$.]



Let $P_t$ be the set of $2times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 and trace $t$. Both $P_0$ and $P_1$ are irreducible as algebraic varieties (being $mathrmSL_2$ conjugacy classes). Then for $K$ a field of characteristic zero, $P_0(K)$ is the set of elements of order 4 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$, and $P_1(K)$ is the set of elements of order 6 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$.



For every $(g,h)in P_0times P_1$, $g^2=h^3$ equals $-I_2$. Hence the set of representations of $$mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)=langle u,vmid u^4=v^6=[u^2,v]=[u,v^3]=1rangle$$ (restricting to those for which the image of $u$ has order 4 and the order of $v$ has order 6)
into $mathrmSL_2(K)$ can be naturally identified to $(P_0times P_1)(K)$. Note that $P_0times P_1$ is irreducible.



Write $P_t^sharp=P_t(mathbfC)capmathrmSU(2)$. Then using that $mathrmSU(2)$ is Zariski-dense in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$ and describing $P_t(mathbfC)$ as a conjugacy class, one deduces that $P_t^sharp$ is Zariski-dense in $P_t(mathbfC)$. So $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ (which is a 4-dimensional real manifold) is Zariski-dense in $(P_0times P_1)(mathbfC)$.



For every given nontrivial element $w$ in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ the set of representations vanishing on $w$ is a proper subvariety of $P_0times P_1$, hence has dimension $le 3$. By Zariski density of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$, we deduce that its intersection with $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ is a proper Zariski closed subset (because $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ admits one faithful representation into $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$, the standard one); in particular it has empty interior (in the ordinary topology). By the Baire theorem, the union over all $w$ is still a proper subset. Hence we deduce the existence of an element of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ defining a faithful representation.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 6




    Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
    – Uri Bader
    Aug 25 at 8:54










  • @UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
    – YCor
    Aug 25 at 9:25













18












18








18






Here a non-explicit proof of the existence of a faithful representation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(2)$, using basic algebraic geometry and topology, and relying on the amalgam decomposition of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$.



[The basic idea is that if all representations in $mathrmSU(2)$ were non-faithful, by Zariski-density this would also be the case for representations into $mathrmSL_2$. We need to use the particular form of the presentation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$, since the argument will not carry over representations of $mathrmSL_3(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(3)$.]



Let $P_t$ be the set of $2times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 and trace $t$. Both $P_0$ and $P_1$ are irreducible as algebraic varieties (being $mathrmSL_2$ conjugacy classes). Then for $K$ a field of characteristic zero, $P_0(K)$ is the set of elements of order 4 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$, and $P_1(K)$ is the set of elements of order 6 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$.



For every $(g,h)in P_0times P_1$, $g^2=h^3$ equals $-I_2$. Hence the set of representations of $$mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)=langle u,vmid u^4=v^6=[u^2,v]=[u,v^3]=1rangle$$ (restricting to those for which the image of $u$ has order 4 and the order of $v$ has order 6)
into $mathrmSL_2(K)$ can be naturally identified to $(P_0times P_1)(K)$. Note that $P_0times P_1$ is irreducible.



Write $P_t^sharp=P_t(mathbfC)capmathrmSU(2)$. Then using that $mathrmSU(2)$ is Zariski-dense in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$ and describing $P_t(mathbfC)$ as a conjugacy class, one deduces that $P_t^sharp$ is Zariski-dense in $P_t(mathbfC)$. So $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ (which is a 4-dimensional real manifold) is Zariski-dense in $(P_0times P_1)(mathbfC)$.



For every given nontrivial element $w$ in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ the set of representations vanishing on $w$ is a proper subvariety of $P_0times P_1$, hence has dimension $le 3$. By Zariski density of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$, we deduce that its intersection with $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ is a proper Zariski closed subset (because $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ admits one faithful representation into $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$, the standard one); in particular it has empty interior (in the ordinary topology). By the Baire theorem, the union over all $w$ is still a proper subset. Hence we deduce the existence of an element of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ defining a faithful representation.






share|cite|improve this answer












Here a non-explicit proof of the existence of a faithful representation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(2)$, using basic algebraic geometry and topology, and relying on the amalgam decomposition of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$.



[The basic idea is that if all representations in $mathrmSU(2)$ were non-faithful, by Zariski-density this would also be the case for representations into $mathrmSL_2$. We need to use the particular form of the presentation of $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$, since the argument will not carry over representations of $mathrmSL_3(mathbfZ)$ in $mathrmSU(3)$.]



Let $P_t$ be the set of $2times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 and trace $t$. Both $P_0$ and $P_1$ are irreducible as algebraic varieties (being $mathrmSL_2$ conjugacy classes). Then for $K$ a field of characteristic zero, $P_0(K)$ is the set of elements of order 4 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$, and $P_1(K)$ is the set of elements of order 6 in $mathrmSL_2(K)$.



For every $(g,h)in P_0times P_1$, $g^2=h^3$ equals $-I_2$. Hence the set of representations of $$mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)=langle u,vmid u^4=v^6=[u^2,v]=[u,v^3]=1rangle$$ (restricting to those for which the image of $u$ has order 4 and the order of $v$ has order 6)
into $mathrmSL_2(K)$ can be naturally identified to $(P_0times P_1)(K)$. Note that $P_0times P_1$ is irreducible.



Write $P_t^sharp=P_t(mathbfC)capmathrmSU(2)$. Then using that $mathrmSU(2)$ is Zariski-dense in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$ and describing $P_t(mathbfC)$ as a conjugacy class, one deduces that $P_t^sharp$ is Zariski-dense in $P_t(mathbfC)$. So $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ (which is a 4-dimensional real manifold) is Zariski-dense in $(P_0times P_1)(mathbfC)$.



For every given nontrivial element $w$ in $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ the set of representations vanishing on $w$ is a proper subvariety of $P_0times P_1$, hence has dimension $le 3$. By Zariski density of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$, we deduce that its intersection with $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ is a proper Zariski closed subset (because $mathrmSL_2(mathbfZ)$ admits one faithful representation into $mathrmSL_2(mathbfC)$, the standard one); in particular it has empty interior (in the ordinary topology). By the Baire theorem, the union over all $w$ is still a proper subset. Hence we deduce the existence of an element of $P_0^sharptimes P_1^sharp$ defining a faithful representation.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 24 at 22:52









YCor

27.1k380132




27.1k380132







  • 6




    Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
    – Uri Bader
    Aug 25 at 8:54










  • @UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
    – YCor
    Aug 25 at 9:25












  • 6




    Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
    – Uri Bader
    Aug 25 at 8:54










  • @UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
    – YCor
    Aug 25 at 9:25







6




6




Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
– Uri Bader
Aug 25 at 8:54




Just to state the obvious: this answer describes the extra mileage you need to go for having a faithfu two dimensional unirep. Just to get a faithful f.d unirep it is a lot easier to induce one from a finite index free group...
– Uri Bader
Aug 25 at 8:54












@UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
– YCor
Aug 25 at 9:25




@UriBader thanks for noticing. I guess the smallest index of a free subgroup is 12, so this yields a 24-dimensional representation that has finite kernel, hence kernel of order $le 2$ (I guess 2). Using a 1-dimensional representation (through $C_12$ that's faithful on $-I_2$, we eventually get a faithful 25-dimensional unitary representation.
– YCor
Aug 25 at 9:25

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f309050%2ffinite-dimensional-faithful-unitary-representations-of-sl2-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

𛂒𛀶,𛀽𛀑𛂀𛃧𛂓𛀙𛃆𛃑𛃷𛂟𛁡𛀢𛀟𛁤𛂽𛁕𛁪𛂟𛂯,𛁞𛂧𛀴𛁄𛁠𛁼𛂿𛀤 𛂘,𛁺𛂾𛃭𛃭𛃵𛀺,𛂣𛃍𛂖𛃶 𛀸𛃀𛂖𛁶𛁏𛁚 𛂢𛂞 𛁰𛂆𛀔,𛁸𛀽𛁓𛃋𛂇𛃧𛀧𛃣𛂐𛃇,𛂂𛃻𛃲𛁬𛃞𛀧𛃃𛀅 𛂭𛁠𛁡𛃇𛀷𛃓𛁥,𛁙𛁘𛁞𛃸𛁸𛃣𛁜,𛂛,𛃿,𛁯𛂘𛂌𛃛𛁱𛃌𛂈𛂇 𛁊𛃲,𛀕𛃴𛀜 𛀶𛂆𛀶𛃟𛂉𛀣,𛂐𛁞𛁾 𛁷𛂑𛁳𛂯𛀬𛃅,𛃶𛁼

Edmonton

Crossroads (UK TV series)