Is an event a subspace of the sample space?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a lecture today, a professor of mine described an event as being "in" the sample space. When writing on the board, for a sample space $S$ and event $E$, it was denoted: $$E in S $$
This confused me, as I have always thought that events were subsets of the sample space, in which I case I would write: $$E subset S$$
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of the sample space. If they are not subsets of the sample space, then how are they defined?
For example, let $S$ be the 6 possible outcomes of rolling a 6-sided die. If we were interested in event $E$, where the number of pips is even, would $E$ not be a subset of all possible outcomes?
probability notation sigma-algebra
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a lecture today, a professor of mine described an event as being "in" the sample space. When writing on the board, for a sample space $S$ and event $E$, it was denoted: $$E in S $$
This confused me, as I have always thought that events were subsets of the sample space, in which I case I would write: $$E subset S$$
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of the sample space. If they are not subsets of the sample space, then how are they defined?
For example, let $S$ be the 6 possible outcomes of rolling a 6-sided die. If we were interested in event $E$, where the number of pips is even, would $E$ not be a subset of all possible outcomes?
probability notation sigma-algebra
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
1
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
1
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In a lecture today, a professor of mine described an event as being "in" the sample space. When writing on the board, for a sample space $S$ and event $E$, it was denoted: $$E in S $$
This confused me, as I have always thought that events were subsets of the sample space, in which I case I would write: $$E subset S$$
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of the sample space. If they are not subsets of the sample space, then how are they defined?
For example, let $S$ be the 6 possible outcomes of rolling a 6-sided die. If we were interested in event $E$, where the number of pips is even, would $E$ not be a subset of all possible outcomes?
probability notation sigma-algebra
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
In a lecture today, a professor of mine described an event as being "in" the sample space. When writing on the board, for a sample space $S$ and event $E$, it was denoted: $$E in S $$
This confused me, as I have always thought that events were subsets of the sample space, in which I case I would write: $$E subset S$$
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of the sample space. If they are not subsets of the sample space, then how are they defined?
For example, let $S$ be the 6 possible outcomes of rolling a 6-sided die. If we were interested in event $E$, where the number of pips is even, would $E$ not be a subset of all possible outcomes?
probability notation sigma-algebra
probability notation sigma-algebra
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
edited Aug 23 at 0:51
Sycorax
37.2k894183
37.2k894183
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
asked Aug 23 at 0:46
James Otto
233
233
1
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
1
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16
add a comment |
1
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
1
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16
1
1
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
1
1
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of
the sample space.
No you're correct. Events are subsets of the sample space. There could be a few sources of confusion, though.
An event $E$ is a subset of $S$, however it is an element of sigma-field or sigma-algebra generated by $S$. Perhaps he wrote something like $E in sigma(S)$. This is because the sigma-field is a set of sets.
I think I recall that certain textbooks differentiate between events and "simple events." In the case of your dice example, $1 in 1,2,3,4,5,6$, but $1 subset 1,2,3,4,5,6$. In the first case, a simple event is an element of the space, and in the second, it's a set. I don't know, though. I find this confusing myself.
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of
the sample space.
No you're correct. Events are subsets of the sample space. There could be a few sources of confusion, though.
An event $E$ is a subset of $S$, however it is an element of sigma-field or sigma-algebra generated by $S$. Perhaps he wrote something like $E in sigma(S)$. This is because the sigma-field is a set of sets.
I think I recall that certain textbooks differentiate between events and "simple events." In the case of your dice example, $1 in 1,2,3,4,5,6$, but $1 subset 1,2,3,4,5,6$. In the first case, a simple event is an element of the space, and in the second, it's a set. I don't know, though. I find this confusing myself.
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of
the sample space.
No you're correct. Events are subsets of the sample space. There could be a few sources of confusion, though.
An event $E$ is a subset of $S$, however it is an element of sigma-field or sigma-algebra generated by $S$. Perhaps he wrote something like $E in sigma(S)$. This is because the sigma-field is a set of sets.
I think I recall that certain textbooks differentiate between events and "simple events." In the case of your dice example, $1 in 1,2,3,4,5,6$, but $1 subset 1,2,3,4,5,6$. In the first case, a simple event is an element of the space, and in the second, it's a set. I don't know, though. I find this confusing myself.
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of
the sample space.
No you're correct. Events are subsets of the sample space. There could be a few sources of confusion, though.
An event $E$ is a subset of $S$, however it is an element of sigma-field or sigma-algebra generated by $S$. Perhaps he wrote something like $E in sigma(S)$. This is because the sigma-field is a set of sets.
I think I recall that certain textbooks differentiate between events and "simple events." In the case of your dice example, $1 in 1,2,3,4,5,6$, but $1 subset 1,2,3,4,5,6$. In the first case, a simple event is an element of the space, and in the second, it's a set. I don't know, though. I find this confusing myself.
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
When I asked after class, I was told that events are not subsets of
the sample space.
No you're correct. Events are subsets of the sample space. There could be a few sources of confusion, though.
An event $E$ is a subset of $S$, however it is an element of sigma-field or sigma-algebra generated by $S$. Perhaps he wrote something like $E in sigma(S)$. This is because the sigma-field is a set of sets.
I think I recall that certain textbooks differentiate between events and "simple events." In the case of your dice example, $1 in 1,2,3,4,5,6$, but $1 subset 1,2,3,4,5,6$. In the first case, a simple event is an element of the space, and in the second, it's a set. I don't know, though. I find this confusing myself.
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
answered Aug 23 at 3:34
Taylor
11.4k11743
11.4k11743
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
add a comment |
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
I should have mentioned in my original post, I asked my professor after class and they were not referring to the sigma-algebra generated by $S$. I have never heard of "simple events", that is very interesting. However, the events we were discussing had more than one element, so I do not believe they could be classified as "simple events", and would need to be subsets of $S$.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:00
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f363508%2fis-an-event-a-subspace-of-the-sample-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Unless your professor is using unusual definitions of "event" and "sample space," s/he is plainly wrong. (Even Wikipedia is unambiguously clear about that.) Perhaps you could quote the definitions they are using?
– whuber♦
Aug 23 at 13:14
We are using standard definitions of events and sample spaces. A sample space is defined as all possible outcomes of an experiment, and an event is defined as some set of outcomes in the sample space.
– James Otto
Aug 25 at 1:07
1
And that answers your question definitively.
– whuber♦
Aug 25 at 13:16